No. It must be overwhelming evidence that proves fraud...and supports the evidence already available. The real key to this problem are the state legislatures. They could end this in a minute if they did their job. If the evidence persuades the state legislatures in these battleground States then we're good. The balance can be tipped very easily if one or two more pieces of the puzzle get put into place. This is just my personal opinion.
Yes, I do. If it's incontrovertible evidence that bolster the already available evidence. Infact, even without any new evidence I believe there are possibly enough state legislatures to withdrawn their certification to put the election in Congress as a contingent election. I have also not lost faith in the supreme court making a statement that might influence the state legislatures in these contested states. This is my opinion. I hope I'm correct.
What do you do with that evidence? Maybe if you slip the judge $100k with each item he will read it?
No. It must be overwhelming evidence that proves fraud...and supports the evidence already available. The real key to this problem are the state legislatures. They could end this in a minute if they did their job. If the evidence persuades the state legislatures in these battleground States then we're good. The balance can be tipped very easily if one or two more pieces of the puzzle get put into place. This is just my personal opinion.
Are you thinking that the courts or politicians care about evidence? Where did you get that idea?
Yes, I do. If it's incontrovertible evidence that bolster the already available evidence. Infact, even without any new evidence I believe there are possibly enough state legislatures to withdrawn their certification to put the election in Congress as a contingent election. I have also not lost faith in the supreme court making a statement that might influence the state legislatures in these contested states. This is my opinion. I hope I'm correct.