He testified in Arizona. He spent 3 days looking into data (his friend asked him on Friday, and the hearing was on Monday), 20 hours he said. His finding in Arizona is related to fake people. It led him to his current hypothesis that states all across the USA are creating fake people in order to get more benefits from the federal government.
In Arizona, Bobby's work is on point. There is massive evidence of fake people. His first talk about Arizona focused on the undisclosed gender voters. In Arizona they have over 450,000 voters of undisclosed gender. For comparison, Georgia (with 3.4 million more people), has only 15,000 voters registered with undisclosed gender. There's a bit more depth to taht as well, specifically in regards to how those undisclosed gender voters are evenly distributed among differnet types of voters (hard-line Republican to swing to hard-line democrat). He also found it quite telling that there were an almost equal number of hard-line republicans registering as undisclosed gender as there were hard-line democrats. Doesn't make much sense if you think about it...what type of person is likely to choose undisclosed gender? I'll give you a hint, it's not a hard-line republican.
His theory is that these undisclosed gender voters in Arizona are fake people.
Additionally, he found that the population in Arizona went up 60%* since 2000, but their voter population (people registered to vote) went up 300% since 1998.
I may have misrecalled this 60% number, but I think that's about right.
He testified in Arizona. He spent 3 days looking into data (his friend asked him on Friday, and the hearing was on Monday), 20 hours he said. His finding in Arizona is related to fake people. It led him to his current hypothesis that states all across the USA are creating fake people in order to get more benefits from the federal government.
In Arizona, Bobby's work is on point. There is massive evidence of fake people. His first talk about Arizona focused on the undisclosed gender voters. In Arizona they have over 450,000 voters of undisclosed gender. For comparison, Georgia (with 3.4 million more people), has only 15,000 voters registered with undisclosed gender. There's a bit more depth to taht as well, specifically in regards to how those undisclosed gender voters are evenly distributed among differnet types of voters (hard-line Republican to swing to hard-line democrat). He also found it quite telling that there were an almost equal number of hard-line republicans registering as undisclosed gender as there were hard-line democrats. Doesn't make much sense if you think about it...what type of person is likely to choose undisclosed gender? I'll give you a hint, it's not a hard-line republican.
His theory is that these undisclosed gender voters in Arizona are fake people.
Additionally, he found that the population in Arizona went up 60%* since 2000, but their voter population (people registered to vote) went up 300% since 1998.
Great rundown!