I think it’s 100% bullshit. She was 15 and all excited about getting her license or permit or whatever. Sent a video to one friend who forwarded it out. Clearly was not victimizing anybody and didn’t even use it to disparage anyone.
But she said it, she recorded it, she sent it, so there was no violation in the creation of the video. Her friend forwarded it to a few people, no violation of rights there. Soiboi fag made it public, but that’s not a violation either. College can accept or reject applicants to curate a student body to fit their vision.
I think it’s bullshit and is really a sign of the times here in clown world. But I don’t really see where there was a violation of rights.
University's should behave in a way that protects the students (and incoming students) rights, as if they were the government, or they should immediately lose their local, state, and federal funding and accreditations.
Ianal but the sandmann case was about the msm intentionally misrepresenting the story specifically in order to make Nick look bad and ruin his life.
In this case, she did say the word and afaik he just released the full video that she herself took and sent out.
I don’t think she deserves to have her life ruined but I’m not sure it is comparable to nick’s case.
I think it’s 100% bullshit. She was 15 and all excited about getting her license or permit or whatever. Sent a video to one friend who forwarded it out. Clearly was not victimizing anybody and didn’t even use it to disparage anyone.
But she said it, she recorded it, she sent it, so there was no violation in the creation of the video. Her friend forwarded it to a few people, no violation of rights there. Soiboi fag made it public, but that’s not a violation either. College can accept or reject applicants to curate a student body to fit their vision.
I think it’s bullshit and is really a sign of the times here in clown world. But I don’t really see where there was a violation of rights.
University's should behave in a way that protects the students (and incoming students) rights, as if they were the government, or they should immediately lose their local, state, and federal funding and accreditations.
Don't forget Trump made that executive order that cuts their federal funding if they're teaching critical race theory. Which they probably are.
If it's a public college (government funded), they can't dismiss someone based on language on grounds of the 1st amendment, right?