164
Comments (28)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
magasf3n 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am right there with you, but just so you know, technically in the '08 study of the Spanish Flu that this post is referencing (which Fauci was a part of), yes they did find that autopsies "uniformly" revealed bacterial pneumonia as the cause of death, and yes Fauci is on record saying that the pneumonia was like a one-two punch, in which the Spanish Flu weakened and the pneumonia killed. However, the "fact check" for this claim is that the '08 study does not correlate mask wearing with bacterial pneumonia. That is a conclusion beyond the scope of the study. Not saying I don't agree - I do - but just be prepared when you talk about this with a liberal who has Google, that's the fact check they will find.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
magasf3n 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, many large cities had mask mandates for a month or two, some like San Francisco had two mask mandates.

1
Wishiwastrumpswife [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes in 1918 they made them wear mask

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Wishiwastrumpswife [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

What’s not true?

1
Wishiwastrumpswife [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

There’s some interesting propaganda going on in some of these ads

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=1918+mask+wearing&t=h_&iax=images&ia=images

2
Wishiwastrumpswife [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

They don’t say it’s at the fault of the mask, but it’s implied because people are breathing in bacteria and toxins.

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/bacterial-pneumonia-caused-most-deaths-1918-influenza-pandemic

1
magasf3n 1 point ago +1 / -0

I fully agree, I'm just saying the study does not itself draw that conclusion. So that is the "debunk".

1
Wishiwastrumpswife [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s just where you interpret it and make your own inferences and come up with your own conclusions for what the evidence is supporting.