87
Comments (24)
sorted by:
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
TheImpossible1 5 points ago +5 / -0

What if the report doesn't exist/is compromised? People are putting way too much hope in that EO.

3
Tokens_Worth 3 points ago +3 / -0

"you are too low IQ to understand a 2 paragraph image"

2
TheImpossible1 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are too low IQ to understand everyone is a traitor until proven otherwise.

4
Sombradeti 4 points ago +4 / -0

I highly doubt Trump is going to execute all these people...also Trump himself already said Marshal Law is fake news.

4
Tokens_Worth 4 points ago +4 / -0

He doesnt need Marshal Law, he needs the insurrection act.
Those are two very diff things.

9
MikeObamasVeineyCock 9 points ago +9 / -0

martial

2
Kimball_Kinnison [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think he can do it with just arrests.

2
Tokens_Worth 2 points ago +2 / -0

agreed.

2
Groz699 2 points ago +2 / -0

To bad we're already under marahall law in these dem run states.

1
Tokens_Worth 1 point ago +1 / -0

ouch. yes.

3
Kimball_Kinnison [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I do, too. I'd be happy with arrests.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
TheRoyalRob 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'll take executions, these people need to be made example of... at least the worst of the worst do.

Live TV, gallows in the national mall, congress, senate, SCOTUS all in attendance... so they know we aren't fucking around.

2
Scooby721 2 points ago +2 / -0

Saved

2
TheRoyalRob 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean, I'll agree 100% that the powers that be know something we don't know, and have known this since November 4th or earlier.

Everything we have seen up until this point is smoke and mirrors.

2
Kimball_Kinnison [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Note to mods: It's strange that I don't seem to be able to post tall graphics. I had to remake this to get it to upload.

5
2008RonPaul2012 5 points ago +5 / -0

I liked this format. Less moving around, more readable.

1
alien123 1 point ago +1 / -0

I did a bit of research on jan 6 and the above is NOT accurate. it is way more complicated.

the way ballots are certified, sent, counted, called, etc. is more complicated then this. only a court of law can determine that a slate of electors is invalid.

second, pence does not call out the votes. there are 2 callers from each party who call out the votes.

there is nothing that says that pence can pick between competing elector slates. that means invalid electors must be determined by a court of law before jan 6th, and filed with the correct agency

1
TheRoyalRob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Legit question, on January 6th is that the new congress and senate at that point that was just voted in?

1
HowManyLumpsDoYaWant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Typical dem response with a slack jaw and eyes that only open half way: “Nuh, uh.”

1
Harper42190 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hard to believe considering there is a mistake in the first paragraph..

1
Kimball_Kinnison [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which is...?

2
Harper42190 2 points ago +2 / -0

PA + one state puts Joe under 270.

Joe has 306 PA = 20 GA & MI = 16 NV = 6 WI = 10 AZ = 11

Anyone who doesn't know that as very basic common info by now I don't trust.