37 What does this mean? Did McConnell object to the bill earlier just to introduce this instead? (twitter.com) posted 108 days ago by Shit_tyrone 108 days ago by Shit_tyrone +37 / -0 7 comments share 7 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (7) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 108 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 108 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – KuzoKevin 3 points 108 days ago +3 / -0 This is maddening. We've all been arguing for a clean bill, and to add attachments now is bull-shit. Deal with 230 in a separate bill. permalink save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – deleted 0 points 108 days ago +1 / -1 ▲ 2 ▼ – sustainable_saltmine 2 points 108 days ago +2 / -0 delay tactic to run out the clock so they don't actually have to follow through permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – WeCantHaveNiceThings 1 point 108 days ago +1 / -0 This was announced by the White House two days ago- $2000, 230 repeal and election reform. The demonrats tried to sabotage it with a publicity stunt and at the same time trying to sabotage POTUS on 230 and election reform. permalink save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – deleted 0 points 108 days ago +1 / -1
This is maddening. We've all been arguing for a clean bill, and to add attachments now is bull-shit.
Deal with 230 in a separate bill.
delay tactic to run out the clock so they don't actually have to follow through
This was announced by the White House two days ago- $2000, 230 repeal and election reform. The demonrats tried to sabotage it with a publicity stunt and at the same time trying to sabotage POTUS on 230 and election reform.