Trump Campaign Takes Wisconsin Constitutional Fight to Supreme Court
(donaldtrumpcampaign.cmail19.com)
Comments (233)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
I can’t wait for this to be denied under some ridiculous pretense.
At least I don't see what mental gymnastics they can do to say No Standing because Trump is the injured party and thus has standing.
They will either use "laches - too late" or just not hear the case until after inauguration.
The court will be creative, and reject the case with something new.
No need to get fancy just “fuck you we won’t hear it”.
Yup, they can literally say no thanks, pass.
I'm going to play the Optimist Card (it's so rarely used) and suggest that SCOTUS has been waiting for a case that can't be seen as political, but purely factual in regards to a Constitutional issue. AKA, something that no future Court nor scholar can legitimately piss on them about. AKA, a case that allows them to crush the fraud AND remain impartial - and thus gives them an important legacy. [and maybe Roberts has had enough time to realize Trump will go Nuclear Abe if SCOTUS punts].
6 weeks ago I would have agreed. Now I would bet my last dollar they will avoid this in some slimy way.
Yeah. That was The Texas case, remember?
If they take it they still rule against trump somehow.
I like your take on this. Doomers are losers because they have already beaten themselves in their own heads, instead of waiting to see what actually happens.
This is a site for WINNERS.
P.S. I like your username too 👍
It is winter break after all people. We can’t expect any work to be done. I also see a scenario where this is all litigated and figured out while neatly tucked away between this inauguration and midterms so no one from the normies hear shit about this.
Exactly. If SCOTUS won't hear an original jurisdiction case, then it won't hear anything regarding the election.
Supremely bought off
Can someone explain what these latches and no standing shit means?
They're about the timeliness of the injury. The original intent was to prevent someone from from waiting until an unreasonable time to file something in order to unduly benefit when they were quite aware early on about the supposed infringement.
I.e. Your a property owner and the person adjacent to you is building a skyscraper that infringes on your property, but wait until the grand opening to file your lawsuit.
Withhold Roberts' adrenochrome allotments and see how fast they will docket this case
Rejected: “Orange Man Bad”
Need to take down the swamp with force, enough is enough!
Otherwise traitors will continue to FUCK US OVER AND OVER AND OVER UNTIL WE ARE GAME OVER
Let's hope even Roberts is wrapped into this treasonous coup and sent to Gitmo.. Or hung so that the SCOTUS straightens the fuck up
9 SCOOPS OF SCOTUS PICKS
Because Blumpf!
Thats too intellectual for the court
Then we must be creative in how we handle them.
woodchippers sound fun
alito and thomas can do the honors of throwing the switch
This.
The supreme court's reaction to anything will always be the same thing..
Their end of the day thought process is... "If you don't like it do something about it you have your fourth box." If it's bad enough as you say it is then put up or shut up...
I honestly think that's their secretive mentality when dealing with this situation
No one on the supreme court has the balls to make the decisions that need to be made. only 2 have even the tiniest of scrotums.
For some of us, the Fourth Box is also the first, sixth, seventh, eighth, nineth, and so forth...
Nah, 7/9ths of them know they have the best job ever with supreme respect, power, and influence, and also can’t be fired.
I dobt want constitutional judges anymore. They cuck us routinely. I want full on America First judges.
They really do use the Constitution as an excuse for inaction and cowardice
Mr Trump has no standing because he has not experienced injury resulting from election fraud. Please, come back after Jan 20th.
Love always,
Justice Roberts
Courts Log January 21st, 2021; Dear Mr. Drumph, we have decided through laches that you have no standing because you didn’t file before the election happened. XOXO John Roberts.
I’m counting on January 6th and millions of pedes being the determining factor.
wouldnt it be great. but we really need the win a day ir two before in order to make it easier for people normies to fully get behind pence
At this point I welcome it. Keep playing around fuckers.
I don't agree. There is no point in that. Doesn't matter when he does it or what he tries first all the MSM and all the Libtards are going to be screaming "DICTATOR!" at the top of their lungs. Only problem for them is I won't be able to hear them over the sound of reloading.
It’s for the normies and the independents, he’s letting the left expose itself so that when it goes down, they have no moral authority to say he’s a tyrant, not that they have morals to begin with but you get the point
This ☝
Fuck Around and Find Out
“Fucketh About, And Discover Thy Fate”
LOVE IT!! https://thedonald.win/p/11RNyBBBjF/go-fuckith-thyself/
Uh...its Thursday therefore this case has no standing.
Wait it’s Tuesday. Can’t get the day straight? No standing.
Mr President, since your counsel submitted this whilst wearing blue socks, there is no standing since we can only accept from counsel while wearing red socks in December. NEXT!!
Monday? I don't have Sunday! What do you need Saturday for, anyway?
Oh wait, wrong joke! Haha.
Due to this being a day ending in "day", you have no standing.
Xoxoxoxox
Smoochies,
John Roberts
CNN reported it being thursday
They will just put the response date sometime after the 20th.
Mayor Rudolph J. Giuliani, the Trump campaign’s lead attorney, today announced that the campaign filed a petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the Wisconsin Supreme Court decision that allowed over 50,000 illegal absentee ballots in violation of Article II of the U.S. Constitution and Wisconsin law. The filing seeks expedited consideration before the January 6 Congressional review of the Electoral College votes. This marks the second Constitutional challenge to illegal mail voting filed by the Campaign, following a petition from Pennsylvania filed on December 20.
According to President Trump’s lead Wisconsin attorney, Jim Troupis: “Regrettably, the Wisconsin Supreme Court, in their 4-3 decision, refused to address the merits of our claim. This ‘Cert Petition’ asks them to address our claims, which, if allowed, would change the outcome of the election in Wisconsin.” Troupis noted, “Three members of the Wisconsin State Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice, agreed with many of the President’s claims in written dissents from that court’s December 14 order.”
Professor John Eastman, a constitutional scholar at the Claremont Institute, also noted: “The petition challenging the decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court to allow partisan state and local election officials to ignore key anti-fraud provisions of Wisconsin law is extremely persuasive. The federal constitutional issues raised by the case cannot be more clear. Article II of the Constitution, as interpreted in Bush v. Gore, assigns to the ‘legislature’ the plenary power to determine the manner of choosing presidential electors, not executive officials, un-elected bureaucrats, or even the state’s judiciary. That authority was eviscerated in Wisconsin, resulting in more than 50,000 illegal ballots being cast and counted.”
The Trump Petition raises a number of issues, including:
More than 28,000 votes were counted from people who failed to provide identification by abusing the state’s “indefinitely confined” status, including two Biden electors.
Nearly 6,000 absentee ballots were counted that were contained in incomplete and altered ballot envelopes that the Wisconsin statutes expressly forbid.
More than 17,000 ballots were collected by hand, in direct contravention of the statutes, in Democrat-sponsored events in Madison in September and October.
i can't believe they named him Rudolph
His middle name isn't even J
His legal name is Rudolph. But his middle initials aren't J. Someone on staff had Donald J Trump on the brain.
Wellp there's SCOTUS' excuse to toss it oh boy
That was a common name among NYC Italians at the time.
And they didn't end it with "P. Checkers"
"This case has no standing"
And that's exactly why it won't be allowed.
It took them two weeks to decide to appeal this? wtf?
wow the Biden electors participating in the fraud, lol.
Well here goes another one... let's see what happens.
They really believe there are/should be no consequences for this egregious illegal behavior
They've gotten away with it for so long, they THINK they can get away with it/there's no consequences. But they haven't gone up against Trump before.
If him and us combined can't take them out, then for sure the country's screwed.
Honestly they probably were... however lawsuits were filed before the election to alleging the same thing. SO I guess we'll see!
Meh. SCOTUS is useless. We need executive actions.. insurrection act or declassifying evidence. Or EO13848 and seize shit.
If you look at history, people's rights acquired by legal means always had fails or illusory victories at the beginning. Has anything ever been won with a quick one and done trial? Pressure mounts, and the courts of law bend with the will of the people. Even after a win, freedom requires constant vigilance and constant protection.
Wish I could uptrump more than once.
Dominion has entered the chat
George Soros’ Eye Bags have entered the chat
How is he not dead yet? He was a teenager when he was "repossessing" property from fellow Jews that where sent off to concentration camps. He must have made one hell of a deal.
man, i'm eating, take that ballsack talk somewhere else!
🎵 "THE TENSION MOUNTS!" 🎵
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeVzwNV8QOA
Any of you that weren't around in 1991 to hear this track when it came out, have a listen. Rap meets metal, and the marriage is quite effective! Mandatory to turn up volume really high!
What's the over/under know soon this case gets dismissed? I ain't expecting much from black-robed politicians who masquerade as justices
or they will set the hearing for after Inauguration Day and then they will dismiss it as "moot"
i disagree on the last part. the voting method was changed in opposition to the method proscribed in the laws that existed prior to the incident in the form of the state constitution. therefore it is invalid to allow these votes. so the law existed beforehand, was violated, and as a deterrant to future fuxing afound with the voting methods they will take it up and rule against the lower court. to me this seems the more logical result. otherwise they set the equally damaging precedent that 'muh voters' are an adequate justification for all kinds of election fuckery, where the perpetrators can use the spectre of voter disenfranchisement to grant a kind of blanket immunity.
Amen.
lol
satan has entered the chat
Watching the Supreme Court dodge their duties is particularly infuriating after ACB's sermons about the Constitution.
“I love thwarting the Constitution!” “I have absolutely no backbone.”
The major problem on the SCOTUS is John Roberts. It seems that he is the one preventing any of these cases related to this fraudulent election being heard. He is totally compromised and controlled by the DS. So, I am not holding out much hope that SCOTUS will hear anything connected to this. Remember Roberts was overheard saying that "that MF Trump will not get reelected on my watch."
While Roberts is a problem, I don't know of anything that doesn't suggest those outbursts to be fake news.
Roberts has known about dominion and scorecard for a long time. He approved its use against other countries and knows it’ll come back to him
But is there standing?
"lmao" - faggot SCOTUS, probably
I suspect SCOTUS will do one of two things. They’ll slow walk it (hear it after Jan 6th) or send it back to the Wisconsin Supreme Court which will also slow walk it and hear it after Jan 6th
And see how fast they would take that case.. no latches problem.. of course he has standing... don't doubt me.
My point was that while SCOTUS will block and deny Trump at every turn they would probably immediately take up any Biden challenge that would be laid down on the 6th. But your point is well taken Fren.
"Indefinitely Confined" means you are seriously disabled and in a nursing home. Not because you fear getting the sniffles from Wuhan Flu.
A few thousand voters in Wisconsin properly used that category in 2016.
Hundreds of thousands of voters improperly used it in 2020 Wisconsin. No doubt 99% of these fraud votes went for Mr Sniffy.
Those fucking justices better not dismiss this.
Supreme Court says.. na, we too scared.
Arrest the law breakers.
I have complete faith in the supreme court. ☹️
"If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack." Winston Churchill
Oh man the Supreme Court!
Its all gonna turn around now, just wait. 😒
Time for Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB to cuck out.
I think at this point we all know the outcome of this. it's clear that he is making it obvious for the normies to catch on to the massive fraud and who is against the people while exposing both parties as conspirators . So when the day comes for him to take office once again they won't be as surprised. The is mental warfare not physical.
no taxation without representation, election was fraudulent wisconsin government is illegitimate
SCROTUS will throw it out on the grounds that they dislike Brett Favre and cheese hats are not representative of all of those living in Wisconsin, therefore it cannot be heard due to disenfranchisement of those with lactose intolerance.
The only scotus judges I respect are Thomas and Alito. Thomas should be Chief justice. He's even more of an Originalist than Scalia.
Justice Roberts will throw a tantrum, suck his thumb and that will be that. No wonder justice is blind. Also deaf dumb and cripple. Lady Liberty is really Helen Keller.
Doomers gonna doom, coomers gonna coom
The lawsuit wasn't physically standing on its own and doing kickflips, denied.
We should ding dong ditch the WI Supreme Court members houses mercilessly.
TP their front yard every night.
Water down their cars to enrobe them in a nice coat of ice.
Oh yea hit em with the TP thatll get em.
Sorry but thats just dumb.
Call them like the adults you all are and convince them to do the right thing.
LOL you are right but people doing this sends another kind of message
Pump up the pressure!
Scotus isnt going to do anything except FAAFO.
Meh
It'll be heard in March or something I'm sure.
maybe Robert's can do some work while he ISNT ON TOP OF HIS BABYSITTER
Dismissed
We should’ve done this on November 2nd because apparently we knew about idenfinitely confined people then
Odds they decline to hear it on no standing. The courts are beyond hijacked. All three of Trump’s picks have been tremendously disappointing
SCOTUS is compromised. Hopefully they hear it and understand the gravity of it. We know what the outcome schools be. If they decide the case any other way they should all be relieved of their duty.
Good to see, Rudy has been pretty quiet since he caught the Coof.
Tick tok. Got less than a week
Its my honor to donate to the Trump campaign!