I'm going to play the Optimist Card (it's so rarely used) and suggest that SCOTUS has been waiting for a case that can't be seen as political, but purely factual in regards to a Constitutional issue. AKA, something that no future Court nor scholar can legitimately piss on them about. AKA, a case that allows them to crush the fraud AND remain impartial - and thus gives them an important legacy. [and maybe Roberts has had enough time to realize Trump will go Nuclear Abe if SCOTUS punts].
It is winter break after all people. We can’t expect any work to be done. I also see a scenario where this is all litigated and figured out while neatly tucked away between this inauguration and midterms so no one from the normies hear shit about this.
They're about the timeliness of the injury. The original intent was to prevent someone from from waiting until an unreasonable time to file something in order to unduly benefit when they were quite aware early on about the supposed infringement.
I.e. Your a property owner and the person adjacent to you is building a skyscraper that infringes on your property, but wait until the grand opening to file your lawsuit.
The court will be creative, and reject the case with something new.
No need to get fancy just “fuck you we won’t hear it”.
Yup, they can literally say no thanks, pass.
I'm going to play the Optimist Card (it's so rarely used) and suggest that SCOTUS has been waiting for a case that can't be seen as political, but purely factual in regards to a Constitutional issue. AKA, something that no future Court nor scholar can legitimately piss on them about. AKA, a case that allows them to crush the fraud AND remain impartial - and thus gives them an important legacy. [and maybe Roberts has had enough time to realize Trump will go Nuclear Abe if SCOTUS punts].
It is winter break after all people. We can’t expect any work to be done. I also see a scenario where this is all litigated and figured out while neatly tucked away between this inauguration and midterms so no one from the normies hear shit about this.
Exactly. If SCOTUS won't hear an original jurisdiction case, then it won't hear anything regarding the election.
Supremely bought off
Can someone explain what these latches and no standing shit means?
They're about the timeliness of the injury. The original intent was to prevent someone from from waiting until an unreasonable time to file something in order to unduly benefit when they were quite aware early on about the supposed infringement.
I.e. Your a property owner and the person adjacent to you is building a skyscraper that infringes on your property, but wait until the grand opening to file your lawsuit.
Withhold Roberts' adrenochrome allotments and see how fast they will docket this case
Rejected: “Orange Man Bad”
Need to take down the swamp with force, enough is enough!
Otherwise traitors will continue to FUCK US OVER AND OVER AND OVER UNTIL WE ARE GAME OVER
Let's hope even Roberts is wrapped into this treasonous coup and sent to Gitmo.. Or hung so that the SCOTUS straightens the fuck up
9 SCOOPS OF SCOTUS PICKS
Because Blumpf!
Thats too intellectual for the court
Then we must be creative in how we handle them.
woodchippers sound fun
alito and thomas can do the honors of throwing the switch
This.