I remain confused about SCOTUS punting on the Texas case - from a legal perspective. I get that Roberts is a neocon Never Trumper and a chickenshit, but the lack of dissent from Kav & ACB makes me wonder about whether there's legal reality to Texas lacking standing. But as I'm not a lawyer nor a Constitutional scholar, I fully admit I'm grasping at straws.
I remain confused about SCOTUS punting on the Texas case - from a legal perspective. I get that Roberts is a neocon Never Trumper and a chickenshit, but the lack of dissent from Kav & ACB makes me wonder about whether there's legal reality to Texas lacking standing. But as I'm not a lawyer nor a Constitutional scholar, I fully admit I'm grasping at straws.