Joe "Pedo" Biden enters the chat It all comes back to Ukraine: As per https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcQBlt86ZEg Biden is in deep shit for his Ukraine business and is likely facing a trial over there. The only issue is that there are no extradition treaty between the US and Ukraine.

Bill "I have syphilis" Clinton enters the chat The US and Ukraine are bound by the "Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters" https://www.congress.gov/106/cdoc/tdoc16/CDOC-106tdoc16.pdf This treaty makes it possible to request documents regarding a criminal investigation, therefore putting official pressure on Biden to clarify things. It unfortunately requires "voluntary appearance" to ship accused people abroad. Which means that unless Biden agrees with it, he cannot be put on a plane to Kiev by the US Marshals. This doesn't mean that he shouldn't be called on it: "If you are so sure you did nothing wrong why not go to Ukraine and prove it?" would be a nice GEOTUS tweet.

Casual reader enters the chat "Can't the POTUS just grab a piece of paper and make an extradition treaty with Ukraine?" As per the Constitution, the ability to make treaties lies with the POTUS. Senate is there to "advise and consent", so usually Senate approval is required to officialize something.

"[the President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;

The current congress would most likely never pass a Ukraine extradition Act at this time, yet it doesn't mean Trump can't write it. Senate is there to "advise and consent", that doesn't mean that Trump couldn't write up an extradition treaty with Ukraine tomorrow, and apply it without "advise and consent." Pelosi would shriek, yet that would make the media go bonkers and ruin their New Year's vacation, so it might be worth it just for the trolling points.

Janet "Waco" Reno enters the chat https://www.refworld.org/cases,USA_CA_5,3ae6b6f68.html Now things get spicy. It is all up to legal interpretation, but he case cited here relates to a Rwandan war-criminal asking to not being shipped overseas, tldr, he was denied. The important bread crumbs are:

"The Supreme Court has recognized that of necessity the President may enter into certain binding agreements with foreign nations not strictly congruent with the formalities required by the Constitution's Treaty Clause."

"Thus, we are unconvinced that the President's practice of usually submitting a negotiated treaty to the Senate reflects a historical understanding that a treaty is required to extradite."

Biden being a security risk and a traitor to his country should be enough to remove his SS detail and have the US Marshals escort him to the nearest airport to be handed over to the Ukrainians as per a "certain binding agreement" signed between GEOTUS and the Ukrainians. No need to get the Senate involved. It might not even require the US Marshals, just ask his SS escort him to the plane for his "safety" and leave him there, his mind is so far gone he might go voluntarily for the plane ride. And then let the courts sort it out in Ukraine. I mean, Trump was already "impeached" for asking about it, so he might as well actually do it. Double-jeopardy laws ftw.

Mike "VP" Pence enters the chat On January 6, Pence invalidates all ballots due to Biden been locked away abroad and therefore being unable to take office, sending the election back to Senate where they can pick between Trump and Harris.