14
Comments (10)
sorted by:
3
SmeeeeeAgain 3 points ago +3 / -0

Removing 230 will kill alt tech. 230 just needs teeth and the will to enforce it.

2
CherokeePede 2 points ago +2 / -0

But people can sue them for what they say about us, the president, lying about the election, letting the left spread their critical race theory, calls for violence against conservatives.....

1
wQkeAF 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct. I genuinely believe Trump is baiting them into more censorship, further exposing them. Only then can he garner more support to make all the social media platforms public utilities. That's my theory, at least

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Gotted 1 point ago +1 / -0

What it all means is there will be no free speech on the internet because its to literate and someone might get offended and they might choke on their soy. Just enforce it and use it like it was meant to do for freedom of speech. If they try to censor fine them like the law fines the public.

1
Daddy_Knows_Best 1 point ago +1 / -0

i've heard this too. plausible argument as i understand it. i'm not totally on board with the repeal 230 movement.

1
FluhanWu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought they said reworking.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
giggitybooped 0 points ago +1 / -1

I thought they said reworking. And secondly, those companies would have to choose to be a platform or not. The people throwing the biggest stink about it are people like Pool. I think I've seen him mention it twice. The guy sits on a lot of cash from uToobs.from the word on the street. Would anyone want to see that sort of revenue stream go bye bye even if it was a good thing on the whole if it did?

-1
Anaconda -1 points ago +1 / -2

Pass the damn $2000 bill without the garbage poison pills