Line item veto for the POTUS would be better. But yes term limit these pigs with NO pension or ability to become lobbyists after and yeah I’m with that 100%
It would have to become law through Congress, that’s why it hasn’t happened yet, it would correct how these pigs load up bills with pork. In the 80’s Reagan tried to get it and the Republican “tried” but it didn’t happen. It should have been in the EO 9/12/18 IMO.
Please stop helping the Dems and Commies shread our US Constitution.
1.) Term Limits:
The reason why our American Republic had "soft" term limits for POTUS, Admirals, Generals; is because they have direct command of (federal) troops/soldiers. And as our Founders knew, and has been true since written history, and today. The bond between leader and soldier can be a real danger to a Republic (or any government).
So our Founders had soft term limits of 2 terms for POTUS; and Admirals & Generals have to get continued permission from congress and POTUS to keep going as well.
MARXIST DICTATOR FDR broke these soft term limits; by campaigning in 1940 promising to keep America out of WW2; but of course his goal was to get America into the war to crush all those fighting commies and help commies/marxists inside of countries and between countries.
So the 22nd Amendment was passed, but even here, they didn't put 8 years/two terms; they put 10 years, eg LBJ / JFK on their trip to Dallas to kick off their ticket's re-election.
If you think Term Limits solves anything, then gun grabbing also solves criminals using guns. Banning someone from running for office who meets the minimum requirements is NOT within your power, nor within the governments power in the US Constitution to do.
If you think Term Limits work, then why to the Dems/Marxists put them in place like CA to remove the last unbribeable/unthreatenable Republicans in their way to ultimate unchecked power.
If you ever worked in elected office, you would know it's the staff, the bureaucrats who have most all the power these days; by the time an "elected official" figures out what's going on; they still won't have all the power of the staff. Term limits = the ultimate government run by unelected bureaucracy.
And many other things.
2.) Democrats intentionally break shit, and offer a Constitutionally breaking solution which doesn't solve the "problem".
Removing weapons and guns from schools and places surely prevents mass murders of unarmed people.
Direct Election of senators, that surely stopped government corruption; if only the Founders would have thought of that one.
The FED will surely stop all panics and economic downfalls.
The Patriot Act will surely stop, radical kultural enrichers from coming in.
Lowering the voting age, that surely will stop shipping our boys off to die halfway round the world. And many other examples.
WHEN LAWS ARE BEING BROKEN, THE SOLUTION IS NOT TO PASS MORE LAWS.
WHEN THE US CONSTITUTION IS BEING BROKEN, THE SOLUTION IS NOT TO BREAK IT MORE.
3.) Line Item Veto:
This wouldn't be necessary if the US Constitution was enforced. Earmarks are unconstitutional. If anything in a bill is unconstitutional, the whole bill is stricken down; thus No monster 1000 page Bills would exist. No speaker or Leader of House or Senate has the power to do the things they do. LBJ broke the Senate with his rules when he was Majority Leader. Seniority for committees is also unconstitutional, same with leader appointing committees.
It's congress' job to legislate. It's POTUS' job to executive. It's the judiciary's job to STRIKE DOWN IT'S ASWANDER RULES! and do it's job again.
DO NOT BREAK THE US CONSTITUTION OR OATHS TO UPHOLD IT!
STOP with the BLUEPILLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS DOM IS FLOODING IN BLUEPILLS & BLACKPILLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
STOP LISTENING TO MEGAPHONES WITH BLUEPILLS!!!!!!!!!!!! (eg Mark Levin).
Enforcing the US Constitution as written (Strict-Constructionist) solves most all the "problems".
Some examples as I say above. Most of these are known, "everyone" just agrees to break the rules/law, like Hillary & FIB with hammers:
Seniority for rank within congress is unconstitutional. All members of the House and all members of the Senate are equal (as per the US Constitution). Using "seniority" violates this, and promotes many problems, including assigning power of chairmanship positions, spending, re-election/fundraising, etc.
Earmarks are unconstitutional. Congress can allocate say "Here's $1 mil for Army blankets" but they cannot say which company gets the contract, because that's an Executive Branch function. If a company tries to bribe an Executive Branch person for the contract, that's a crime.
Constitutionality should be a first test, not a test of last resort. If the courts would do their job (Remove their marxist ASHWANDER RULES); means they would strike down any unlawful law (and in it's entirety) means most Bills would be very small as they are supposed to be. It would also mean, justice in time; not decades/generations/centuries later. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashwander_rules
Removing the unconstitutonal LBJ Senate Leadership Rules & equal House Speaker rules. The "unilateral powers" wielded by these two positions is way outside of constitutionality. Yes the chambers can make their own rules; but those rules cannot violate the US Constitution as they presently do. eg Nancy stopped Rep House member Hunter from voting (for months) & stripped of committees (this is not within her/any constitutional power, unless the House votes to boot someone out.)
Enforcing the minimum requirements of Office- There are far too many examples where, members of the House, Senate, etc do not meet the minimum requirements of office as written.
The Only Dual-citizenship in the US Constitution, is a person can be a US Citizen, and Citizen of their State (if they legally live within a State, rather than a territory or D.C.)
Cleaning up much US legal Code, and removing most F.A.R. for government contracting.
Obviously there's some big picture things which help fix the problems too; if can muster up the political will, instead of Amending the Constitution to add Term limits; then there can be the will to do things which help, like
END THE FED (the printing presses required to put "new fiat" money into circulation, means more money than should flows through congress; and it means "other countries/central banks" need US Dollars with the Bretton-Woods System. This means, congress is constantly under very real powerful pressure, to always deficit spend and ship money overseas one way or another.
Repeal Income Tax, and Replace the US Tax code with a Strictly-Constitutional 2 page code. 1 page for the Federal government; and 1 page for State and local governments. Pays off all public debts within one or two generations.
Have a Strictly-Constitutional Republican version of a "minimum Standard of Living" which no American can involuntarily fall below (ie Replaces all the Lefite/Commie crap, with zero Leftie crap.) This gives the "end results" desired (like how Foodstamps is supposed to help Americans from starving) but without the bureaucratic-corrupt-swampy-leftie-market distorting-red tape-haves vs havenots, crap.
In a "perfect world" a US Citizen could only contribute money to a campaign which they can vote for; or which they legally reside in the jurisdiction. This solves most of the "campaign finance" issues. Just as foreign nationals don't have a right to interfere in US Elections, Citizens of other States don't have a right to interfere with other States' Elections either. This gives the republican form of government, of representation by each jurisdiction as designed in the US Constitution.
And many other things, there's lots of barnicles allowed to grow on the hull of the USS Constitution.
[spez] Also some key other very important things like:
Here's a list of solutions to other problems/topcis, I re-typed/compiled out the other week with some other issues like Big Tech/Sect 230, Census, etc:
All the above, are real Solutions that get to the roots of the problems (curing the diseases), not just changing a band-aid or for show or (treating the symptoms).
Exactly, the career bureaucrats in the swamp are a huge problem. They think that we all work for them. The federal government jobs need to be eliminated until only the very few, necessary jobs remain.
Honestly, anything that would make the politicians actually work during their term rather than worry about re-election would be better. Maybe only 1 term, but make it longer but add easier ways to remove or impeach them?
I dunno. But definitely like the idea of term limits at least. It just sucks that even with the president getting 2 terms, the first one is always basically a "play it safe so I get re-elected" term. And that sucks and is not productive.
Serving in congress needs to be a part time service that patriots of business success from every day walks of life provide to their government...more like founding fathers envisioned.
Term Limits ( 2 terms senate, 4 terms in house)
Salary tied to poverty level so it's truly "service" to country
Zero retirement benefits.
Every piece of legislation needs transparency to which member of congress proposed every single line item!
There are term limits already. Two years for the House and six years for Senate.
The system is designed well. The problem is that not enough people vote.
If a congress critter knows that he's out in x number of years no matter how bad or good of a job he did representing his constituents he has no fear of the voter.
AND KILL THE FUCKING CIA / FBI / GARGOYLE / FAKEBOOK / TWATTER / DEPT OF ED / EPA / MOST STATE AND LOCAL GOV / DISNEY / CNN / FOX / CBS / NBC / ABC / NFL / NBL / MLB / PANTIFA / RNC / DNC / PINKO COMMIE FAGS / ESPN (but I digress) / BLM / DAMN NEAR ANYTHING ELSE WITH THREE LETTERS IN IT.
Line item veto for the POTUS would be better. But yes term limit these pigs with NO pension or ability to become lobbyists after and yeah I’m with that 100%
I'm greedy. I want both.
How would he get line item veto ?
It would have to become law through Congress, that’s why it hasn’t happened yet, it would correct how these pigs load up bills with pork. In the 80’s Reagan tried to get it and the Republican “tried” but it didn’t happen. It should have been in the EO 9/12/18 IMO.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Please stop helping the Dems and Commies shread our US Constitution.
1.) Term Limits:
The reason why our American Republic had "soft" term limits for POTUS, Admirals, Generals; is because they have direct command of (federal) troops/soldiers. And as our Founders knew, and has been true since written history, and today. The bond between leader and soldier can be a real danger to a Republic (or any government).
So our Founders had soft term limits of 2 terms for POTUS; and Admirals & Generals have to get continued permission from congress and POTUS to keep going as well.
MARXIST DICTATOR FDR broke these soft term limits; by campaigning in 1940 promising to keep America out of WW2; but of course his goal was to get America into the war to crush all those fighting commies and help commies/marxists inside of countries and between countries.
So the 22nd Amendment was passed, but even here, they didn't put 8 years/two terms; they put 10 years, eg LBJ / JFK on their trip to Dallas to kick off their ticket's re-election.
If you think Term Limits solves anything, then gun grabbing also solves criminals using guns. Banning someone from running for office who meets the minimum requirements is NOT within your power, nor within the governments power in the US Constitution to do.
If you think Term Limits work, then why to the Dems/Marxists put them in place like CA to remove the last unbribeable/unthreatenable Republicans in their way to ultimate unchecked power.
If you ever worked in elected office, you would know it's the staff, the bureaucrats who have most all the power these days; by the time an "elected official" figures out what's going on; they still won't have all the power of the staff. Term limits = the ultimate government run by unelected bureaucracy.
And many other things.
2.) Democrats intentionally break shit, and offer a Constitutionally breaking solution which doesn't solve the "problem".
Removing weapons and guns from schools and places surely prevents mass murders of unarmed people.
Direct Election of senators, that surely stopped government corruption; if only the Founders would have thought of that one.
The FED will surely stop all panics and economic downfalls.
The Patriot Act will surely stop, radical kultural enrichers from coming in.
Lowering the voting age, that surely will stop shipping our boys off to die halfway round the world. And many other examples.
WHEN LAWS ARE BEING BROKEN, THE SOLUTION IS NOT TO PASS MORE LAWS.
WHEN THE US CONSTITUTION IS BEING BROKEN, THE SOLUTION IS NOT TO BREAK IT MORE.
3.) Line Item Veto:
This wouldn't be necessary if the US Constitution was enforced. Earmarks are unconstitutional. If anything in a bill is unconstitutional, the whole bill is stricken down; thus No monster 1000 page Bills would exist. No speaker or Leader of House or Senate has the power to do the things they do. LBJ broke the Senate with his rules when he was Majority Leader. Seniority for committees is also unconstitutional, same with leader appointing committees.
It's congress' job to legislate. It's POTUS' job to executive. It's the judiciary's job to STRIKE DOWN IT'S ASWANDER RULES! and do it's job again.
DO NOT BREAK THE US CONSTITUTION OR OATHS TO UPHOLD IT!
STOP with the BLUEPILLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS DOM IS FLOODING IN BLUEPILLS & BLACKPILLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
STOP LISTENING TO MEGAPHONES WITH BLUEPILLS!!!!!!!!!!!! (eg Mark Levin).
what do you propose?
Good question.
Enforcing the US Constitution as written (Strict-Constructionist) solves most all the "problems".
Some examples as I say above. Most of these are known, "everyone" just agrees to break the rules/law, like Hillary & FIB with hammers:
Seniority for rank within congress is unconstitutional. All members of the House and all members of the Senate are equal (as per the US Constitution). Using "seniority" violates this, and promotes many problems, including assigning power of chairmanship positions, spending, re-election/fundraising, etc.
Earmarks are unconstitutional. Congress can allocate say "Here's $1 mil for Army blankets" but they cannot say which company gets the contract, because that's an Executive Branch function. If a company tries to bribe an Executive Branch person for the contract, that's a crime.
Constitutionality should be a first test, not a test of last resort. If the courts would do their job (Remove their marxist ASHWANDER RULES); means they would strike down any unlawful law (and in it's entirety) means most Bills would be very small as they are supposed to be. It would also mean, justice in time; not decades/generations/centuries later. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashwander_rules
Removing the unconstitutonal LBJ Senate Leadership Rules & equal House Speaker rules. The "unilateral powers" wielded by these two positions is way outside of constitutionality. Yes the chambers can make their own rules; but those rules cannot violate the US Constitution as they presently do. eg Nancy stopped Rep House member Hunter from voting (for months) & stripped of committees (this is not within her/any constitutional power, unless the House votes to boot someone out.)
Enforcing the minimum requirements of Office- There are far too many examples where, members of the House, Senate, etc do not meet the minimum requirements of office as written.
The Only Dual-citizenship in the US Constitution, is a person can be a US Citizen, and Citizen of their State (if they legally live within a State, rather than a territory or D.C.)
Cleaning up much US legal Code, and removing most F.A.R. for government contracting.
Restoring Election Integrity (like my years ago list on TDspezdit, which would have stopped the 2018 Dem Midterm Steal, and this Election's Cycles issues as well.) https://thedonald.win/p/HrTaRe8O/-what-have-brought-our-country-t/
And many other things.
Obviously there's some big picture things which help fix the problems too; if can muster up the political will, instead of Amending the Constitution to add Term limits; then there can be the will to do things which help, like
END THE FED (the printing presses required to put "new fiat" money into circulation, means more money than should flows through congress; and it means "other countries/central banks" need US Dollars with the Bretton-Woods System. This means, congress is constantly under very real powerful pressure, to always deficit spend and ship money overseas one way or another.
Repeal Income Tax, and Replace the US Tax code with a Strictly-Constitutional 2 page code. 1 page for the Federal government; and 1 page for State and local governments. Pays off all public debts within one or two generations.
Have a Strictly-Constitutional Republican version of a "minimum Standard of Living" which no American can involuntarily fall below (ie Replaces all the Lefite/Commie crap, with zero Leftie crap.) This gives the "end results" desired (like how Foodstamps is supposed to help Americans from starving) but without the bureaucratic-corrupt-swampy-leftie-market distorting-red tape-haves vs havenots, crap.
In a "perfect world" a US Citizen could only contribute money to a campaign which they can vote for; or which they legally reside in the jurisdiction. This solves most of the "campaign finance" issues. Just as foreign nationals don't have a right to interfere in US Elections, Citizens of other States don't have a right to interfere with other States' Elections either. This gives the republican form of government, of representation by each jurisdiction as designed in the US Constitution.
And many other things, there's lots of barnicles allowed to grow on the hull of the USS Constitution.
[spez] Also some key other very important things like:
Cleaning up the FIB into the FBI since it's their job to investigate government/lcoal corruption: https://thedonald.win/p/Hrd197tR/x/c/19A0yBZg5x
Cleaning out Marxism: Most institutions of course, need some major marxism removal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_long_march_through_the_institutions
Here's a list of solutions to other problems/topcis, I re-typed/compiled out the other week with some other issues like Big Tech/Sect 230, Census, etc:
https://thedonald.win/p/11R4ukNenF/x/c/4DruwQGVoTS
All the above, are real Solutions that get to the roots of the problems (curing the diseases), not just changing a band-aid or for show or (treating the symptoms).
Swamp monsters simply have puppets in place.
Exactly, the career bureaucrats in the swamp are a huge problem. They think that we all work for them. The federal government jobs need to be eliminated until only the very few, necessary jobs remain.
Honestly, anything that would make the politicians actually work during their term rather than worry about re-election would be better. Maybe only 1 term, but make it longer but add easier ways to remove or impeach them?
I dunno. But definitely like the idea of term limits at least. It just sucks that even with the president getting 2 terms, the first one is always basically a "play it safe so I get re-elected" term. And that sucks and is not productive.
Serving in congress needs to be a part time service that patriots of business success from every day walks of life provide to their government...more like founding fathers envisioned.
So Congress can limit the executive branch?
Just sneak it into a large bill.
We used to call these 'earmarks'.
You should also include limits to their staffers. The staffers just corrupt the next new senator coming into the office.
Thats a great point
Well, they meant the freedom of congress, not yours.
I'm sorry but you guys read that wrong from the beginning.
Yes! Term Limits! Yes!
Convention of States: https://conventionofstates.com/
Because congress will never limit its own power.
Then we will get more puppet cannidates like Joe.
Exactly
This needs to be repeated daily
The should be a required time limit for the public to review a bill any vote.
Get it on the ballot in all 50 states, let the people decide.
Does anyone have a historical reason that Congress never limited thier terms? Surely at some point there must have been a reason.
As well as SCOTUS, and bureaucratic positions!
There are term limits already. Two years for the House and six years for Senate.
The system is designed well. The problem is that not enough people vote.
If a congress critter knows that he's out in x number of years no matter how bad or good of a job he did representing his constituents he has no fear of the voter.
That’s not what a term limit is. A term limit is limit on how many times the same person can serve a term, not how long the term is.
MUTHERFUCKING THIS!!!!
AND KILL THE FUCKING CIA / FBI / GARGOYLE / FAKEBOOK / TWATTER / DEPT OF ED / EPA / MOST STATE AND LOCAL GOV / DISNEY / CNN / FOX / CBS / NBC / ABC / NFL / NBL / MLB / PANTIFA / RNC / DNC / PINKO COMMIE FAGS / ESPN (but I digress) / BLM / DAMN NEAR ANYTHING ELSE WITH THREE LETTERS IN IT.
While I agree... fuck these Facebook-esk images that don't do shit. This .jpg could be 20 years old. Nothing ever seems to change or get fixed.