44
posted ago by Yolobaggins ago by Yolobaggins +44 / -0

Notice how big tech has not said one word about the potential repeal of 230?

Why is that? Because they want it to go away

Remember net neutrality? Every fuck company in the world was crying up a storm about that but we all knew why

Same logic applies here

If 230 is gone completely, big tech will be able to afford lawsuits while small sites won’t. Small sites will be forced to censor because if they don’t, they will be sued and shut down

Comments (8)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
huntfishpede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Like thedonald.win

230 needs to stand but sites like Twatter and Facistbook need to be considered publishers and 230 not apply since they censor.

3
psybrnaut 3 points ago +3 / -0

This. Boss keeps saying repeal 230 but we need it. Rather, we need clarification of it so when a site censors anything other than porn and gore it loses protections.