Manual claim, which was manually approved. Anyone can start the claim, but they have to approve it.
Google's safe browsing is back from the "don't be evil" days, was mostly a good thing akin to having a fire diamond on a hazardous substance. Using it to suppress thought and speech they don't like and justifying it with the flimsiest claims they can find goes to show how much they've changed since then.
Still fiercely competent, but evil through and through.
So they're admitting they manually claimed this was a hacked site, NOT an algorithm or automated mistake, and they're 'adjusting and revoking' it?
Neither Bing or Duckduckgo showed the “hacked” so it was likely added manually.
Clear defamation. Please sue doggos!
Fuck that, I want to live like the Russian DirecTV guy. https://youtu.be/544gFFfuJBM
Sidebar, I took some video production classes in college with the brunette chick in the commercial, Autumn Holley.
Shit man, she's hot. This is completely unprofessional but... Did you fuck her?
I mean you said you "took classes" with her; I assume that meant you fucked her. 👍😆
Sorry.. very very disrespectful of me!
That little blonde chick is hot.
Manual claim, which was manually approved. Anyone can start the claim, but they have to approve it.
Google's safe browsing is back from the "don't be evil" days, was mostly a good thing akin to having a fire diamond on a hazardous substance. Using it to suppress thought and speech they don't like and justifying it with the flimsiest claims they can find goes to show how much they've changed since then.
Still fiercely competent, but evil through and through.
Yes, they list the possible reasons for manual actions here: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/9044175?hl=en
The mods could show us which one they cited - none are immediately obvious to me, but of course they have no obligation to ;).
Reason 0: Our blue-haired reviewers do not like your content.