posted ago by NeverGiveUp1 ago by NeverGiveUp1 +9 / -1

If there is a congressman and senator who object to a state's certification it goes to each chamber for a vote. Here is where it gets interesting though, apparently in the House each member doesn't get a vote. Each state gets one vote and Republicans control 30 of the statehouses and Democrats 20.

My question is what happens if the statehouse votes the electors aren't valid, however, our spineless senators vote they are, what happens?

With that said, if the shoe was on the other foot we all know the Dems would all vote together against certifying the election and throw it into the House. To many spineless GOP senators.

Comments (8)
sorted by:
3
ramcolt1 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're all the Uniparty

1
NeverGiveUp1 [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Bought and paid for, yup.

-4
Anaconda -4 points ago +1 / -5

1887 Electoral College Act sets a mandatory simple majority vote in both the House and Senate for all contested states.

Look at Senator Barbara Boxer contesting Ohio in 2004. It was not a pretty result. She got curbstomped 74-1 in the Senate and 267-31 in the House. SIMPLE MAJORITY VOTES

https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Boxer-delays-presidential-vote-count-with-protest-2740511.php

1
MiddletownDreams 1 point ago +1 / -0

you're not a lawyer, anaconda. this lawyer says you are wrong...... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2rRezgd3Yw

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
Anaconda -2 points ago +2 / -4

1887 Electoral College Act sets a mandatory simple majority vote in both the House and Senate for all contested states.

Look at Senator Barbara Boxer contesting Ohio in 2004. It was not a pretty result. She got curbstomped 74-1 in the Senate and 267-31 in the House. SIMPLE MAJORITY VOTES

https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Boxer-delays-presidential-vote-count-with-protest-2740511.php

1
badball 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah... but the 1887 Electroal College Act is likely unconstitutional