8510 BREAKING: They've HACKED into a Fulton County voting machine that is being used in the Georgia runoff and it IS connected to the internet. LIVE evidence being presented to the GA Senate now! (twitter.com) posted 105 days ago by axolotl_peyotl 105 days ago by axolotl_peyotl +8510 / -0 504 comments share 504 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (504) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 240 ▼ – FTR22 240 points 105 days ago +241 / -1 He should hack into about 10 more or they will just say it was a one off situation. permalink save report block reply ▲ 128 ▼ – Firestorm 128 points 105 days ago +128 / -0 I believe they’re attempting to do just that in the video he mentioned this was the first they got into but it seems they’re working on several other polling locations https://thedonald.win/p/11RO2qiaAM/video-expert-witness-says-his-te/ permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 114 ▼ – DemsFuckKids 114 points 105 days ago +114 / -0 while he's in there he should alter the weighting. It's fraud but no one cares anymore so, just do it permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 52 ▼ – thelastlast 52 points 105 days ago +52 / -0 I mean really. Trump should also just find 2 million uncreased mail-in votes. either it's all cheating or none of it is. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 13 ▼ – MakeAmericaWinAgain 13 points 105 days ago +13 / -0 For every Ossoff/Warnock vote, 6x Purdue/Loeffler vote. Maybe then they’ll look into the REAL votes. Either way, we WIN permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 39 ▼ – deleted 39 points 105 days ago +40 / -1 ▲ 8 ▼ – MakeAmericaWinAgain 8 points 105 days ago +8 / -0 Most probable option permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – theorymeltfool1 4 points 105 days ago +4 / -0 The ridiculous thing is that Pulitzer had to CREATE a system to gather forensic evidence, such as different types of paper, ink, folds, markings, etc. WHY THE FUCK doesn't the FBI or even the US Treasury have that type of system for detecting fraud in the first place? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 23 ▼ – TestableHypothesis 23 points 105 days ago +23 / -0 Or better; Hack all of them on January 5th, and make them report that Xi Jinping received 100% of the votes. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 9 ▼ – MAGA_Flocka_Flame 9 points 105 days ago +9 / -0 “See Blumpfler! Biden didn’t take the votes, Xi did so its dispooted! Checkmate!” permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – yukondave 1 point 105 days ago +1 / -0 write in for Xi Jinping! permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – SludgeWarehouse 4 points 105 days ago +4 / -0 They'll just move the goalposts like they always do by changing it to being a one off situation specific to this run-off election. permalink parent save report block reply
He should hack into about 10 more or they will just say it was a one off situation.
I believe they’re attempting to do just that in the video he mentioned this was the first they got into but it seems they’re working on several other polling locations
https://thedonald.win/p/11RO2qiaAM/video-expert-witness-says-his-te/
while he's in there he should alter the weighting. It's fraud but no one cares anymore so, just do it
I mean really.
Trump should also just find 2 million uncreased mail-in votes. either it's all cheating or none of it is.
For every Ossoff/Warnock vote, 6x Purdue/Loeffler vote. Maybe then they’ll look into the REAL votes. Either way, we WIN
Most probable option
The ridiculous thing is that Pulitzer had to CREATE a system to gather forensic evidence, such as different types of paper, ink, folds, markings, etc.
WHY THE FUCK doesn't the FBI or even the US Treasury have that type of system for detecting fraud in the first place?
Or better;
Hack all of them on January 5th, and make them report that Xi Jinping received 100% of the votes.
“See Blumpfler! Biden didn’t take the votes, Xi did so its dispooted! Checkmate!”
write in for Xi Jinping!
They'll just move the goalposts like they always do by changing it to being a one off situation specific to this run-off election.