7937
posted ago by sleepydude ago by sleepydude +7937 / -0

I wonder how much tape they are gonna have to buy to stitch all the shredded ballots back together.

If they come up short, it is game over.

Comments (310)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
161
2ScoopsofCovfefe 161 points ago +161 / -0

They have had almost 2 months to replace all the trump ballots they shreaded

109
UnidentifiedPa3 109 points ago +110 / -1

The guy’s testimony said they could tell if the ballots were fakes any myriad of ways. Some forensic shit, micro level.

85
nanowerx 85 points ago +85 / -0

Dude said they could tell what country the paper came from and even if the person who handled it was a smoker. Homeboy knew his shit!

53
Ifififokiedoke 53 points ago +53 / -0

What I also though was cool, we can tell if a ballot has been through a machine multiple times.

17
Razamataz 17 points ago +17 / -0

This gave me a forensic boner. I think I was looking like the Vince McMohn meme, lol

24
Poopyonurface 24 points ago +24 / -0

Literally can just check for folds in the mail-in ballots. If they recopied ballots that didn’t scan, they’d still need copies of the originals. They better start folding those 1-200k ballots that they faked.

12
Dtom13 12 points ago +13 / -1

Someone check craigslist for an ad that says "folder needed"

Then reply you are interested and send them a manilla folder

10
MICHIGANisRED 10 points ago +10 / -0

Better look for machine patterns, perfect folds. A mechanical folder could fold all of those in a matter of hours. As a teenager I worked at a printing/mailing company.

17
r_u_srs_srsly 17 points ago +17 / -0

whis is precisely why this whole racket is so laughable.

They didn't bother to do this in the first place.

They didn't bother to check for security cameras.

They didn't bother to actually destroy the ballots, just chucked them in ditches and dumpsters.

But, they spent $50,000 on 5,000 votes in Texas. Jesus, liberals are fucking stupid as fuck.

1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I imagine Mr Forensics B. Nano can tell the difference between a ballot that was folded and then read through machines, vs one read through machines and then folded.

14
namechangearoo 14 points ago +14 / -0

NANO level. When he started talking about th nano participles to see if a printer marked the ballots or if they were printed in China, I could feel the collectives assholes of all of the Riggers tighten up at once

12
thealexpkeaton 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yes, there was a disturbance in the farce.

3
ObjectiveReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

under appreciated

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
1
Immysteryman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nanu nanu

6
blumpkinblake 6 points ago +6 / -0

What they need to do is put some purposely fake votes in there that you can easily tell are fraudulent to see if they'll take a look at them.

Then when they refuse and count it anyway you can catch them in the trap

5
BasedInvestor 5 points ago +5 / -0

They could tell them ahead of time that they are putting a certain number of fake votes in - no need for a surprise. And see if any of them are found. As long as no one leaks which votes are fake (a big ask of our gov) we would have all the standing we need to call out their bullshit

16
KRM944 16 points ago +16 / -0

But, I think the “correct” forensic audit can detect fraudulent ballots- such that those forged/printed by the dominion machine

8
kennedyc5217 8 points ago +8 / -0

Correct, the amount of detail they can go into would unravel the whole thing. We’re the fold creases exactly perfect, is there DNA/skin cells/oil from someone’s skin on the ballots (hence the smoker line), and are the ink blots perfectly filled out? This is some micro NCIS level examination they can do, PRO BONO!

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
7
jamesfinmadison2 7 points ago +7 / -0

It wasn't Jenna's option to use. Not sure why you blame her. Trump is a grown ass man making his own decisions. He could still do it. It's all on him.

2
Here_we_go 2 points ago +2 / -0

January 7th if it doesn't work out

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
4
jamesfinmadison2 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm sick of giving Trump excuses. He's on a speed dial basis with Mark Levin, Dershowitz, Cruz and a shit ton of other constitutional scholars, and historians.

He's a man who created a multibillion dollar empire,and as Flynn says, seeks counsel from many people before making decisions.

He also said he will return in 4 years at his own rally, if the steal stands.

His plan to only go up to the Pence Card is obvious. His hiring and then firing Sidney as special counsel shows he's not going to fight with criminal justice power also.

He's banking on us on the 6th scaring Mitch and Pence. That's it. I can't blame Jenna.

1
canttrumpthis203 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jenna is a hire that I'll never understand. She's inexperienced and not very bright. Also, she seems to confuse martial law with the Insurrection Act. Womp womp.