4229
Comments (91)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
31
content-alphabet 31 points ago +31 / -0

The argument that shills will make is that scanners aren’t perfect and they have margins of error.

The counterargument to that is the margin was ~50 each time.

50*2 for Trump and Biden’s votes margins = 100

Number of test ballots in the machine = 15,000

100 / 15,000 = 0.7%

Biden’s Georgia margin of victory was 0.2%

22
bootsy_two_scoops 22 points ago +22 / -0

How do they reconcile 'acceptable margins of error' with 'count every vote'?

The mind of a Leftie must be a twisted convoluted mess.

12
TheKeagleciser 12 points ago +12 / -0

Margins of error are racist while counting every vote isn't.

Peg squared in the low info lefty.

7
bewwwbbbskizzle 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's literally against federal law to certify if the error is larger than 1/250,000...

8
unicornpoop 8 points ago +8 / -0

Look! A terrorist bombing over here!!

6
ifififififokiedokie 6 points ago +6 / -0

The liberal mind thrives on cognitive dissonance.

There are no genders, yet we have toxic masculinity and a gender pay gap.

Diversity means unity, racism is bad, yet white people are evil because of their race.

Voter ID is racist, vaccine ID is common sense.

Christianity is bad, islam is good. Goes on and on.

These people are mentally ill and need help.

6
PatPede1 6 points ago +6 / -0

None of those percentages comport with legally acceptable limits....not even a little.

2
NYC_4_Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only a Democrat would excuse something failing 93% of the time and labelling it “acceptable.”

1
ifififififokiedokie 1 point ago +1 / -0

No margin of error is acceptable.