This guy killed it today. Controlled the conversation like a boss. I couldn’t tell if the Members were just idiots, or if they were trying to over-control the narrative. You could tell he was very knowledgeable about what he was talking about.
Full Patriot🇺🇸
Certainly didn't persuade the electrical engineer of anything by calling him a mechanical engineer so many times.
I am a Computer Engineer and the guy had a point about the grid lines. The presenter handled it terribly and said things that just aren't true. Things aren't ever "exact" they have to be within tolerance. I think the guy was trying to make a point that the machine should have been able to count them even misaligned. I would have responded that a 97% adjudication rate clearly shows that it DIDN'T count them right.
The presenter's claim that republican area ballots are poorly printed is interesting and would imply that the fraud effort started at printing. Would be interesting to have someone explain why some ballots didn't have bar codes.
You have to take everything he was saying and put it all together. Actual ballots came from a printer (everything will line up perfectly and have its own unique set of barcodes to which there are many), ballots that had to be sent to adjudication (which means a human gets to change those ballots to whatever they like and hit accept) those "ballots" were printed from a mass copy device such has your inkjet printer.
Ballots that are mass printed will not line up unless you have someone who takes the time to line it up. This happens when using a cutting machine. My machine will be properly aligned to strike the same spot every single time.
A ballot that was mass printed didn't have the exact coordinates so the print was off. That also shows why they removed the barcode. They attempted to put printed ballots with no unique identifier through a real counting machine and it kept sending those ballots to be manipulated by an adjudicator, hence the no barcode.
I can tell you with absolute certainty that a program can in fact hit the exact mark every single time. I had a part-time shop with Etsy cutting vinyl designs I would sell in bulk. The cuts had to be exact while first having a printer set to exact standards and a cutting machine that hits those exact standards. This had to be done with such precision that when the vinyl was cut, it was cut to a specific depth to only cut through the vinyl and not the cardstock it sat on. This is how stickers are made.
Ask anyone who works or plays around with illustrator or photoshop how exact things have to be in order to print.
This guy killed it today. Controlled the conversation like a boss. I couldn’t tell if the Members were just idiots, or if they were trying to over-control the narrative. You could tell he was very knowledgeable about what he was talking about. Full Patriot🇺🇸
I was rolling when he kept referring to other legislature dude as "Mr. Mechanical Engineer".
Certainly didn't persuade the electrical engineer of anything by calling him a mechanical engineer so many times.
I am a Computer Engineer and the guy had a point about the grid lines. The presenter handled it terribly and said things that just aren't true. Things aren't ever "exact" they have to be within tolerance. I think the guy was trying to make a point that the machine should have been able to count them even misaligned. I would have responded that a 97% adjudication rate clearly shows that it DIDN'T count them right.
The presenter's claim that republican area ballots are poorly printed is interesting and would imply that the fraud effort started at printing. Would be interesting to have someone explain why some ballots didn't have bar codes.
You have to take everything he was saying and put it all together. Actual ballots came from a printer (everything will line up perfectly and have its own unique set of barcodes to which there are many), ballots that had to be sent to adjudication (which means a human gets to change those ballots to whatever they like and hit accept) those "ballots" were printed from a mass copy device such has your inkjet printer.
Ballots that are mass printed will not line up unless you have someone who takes the time to line it up. This happens when using a cutting machine. My machine will be properly aligned to strike the same spot every single time.
A ballot that was mass printed didn't have the exact coordinates so the print was off. That also shows why they removed the barcode. They attempted to put printed ballots with no unique identifier through a real counting machine and it kept sending those ballots to be manipulated by an adjudicator, hence the no barcode.
I can tell you with absolute certainty that a program can in fact hit the exact mark every single time. I had a part-time shop with Etsy cutting vinyl designs I would sell in bulk. The cuts had to be exact while first having a printer set to exact standards and a cutting machine that hits those exact standards. This had to be done with such precision that when the vinyl was cut, it was cut to a specific depth to only cut through the vinyl and not the cardstock it sat on. This is how stickers are made.
Ask anyone who works or plays around with illustrator or photoshop how exact things have to be in order to print.