This guy killed it today. Controlled the conversation like a boss. I couldn’t tell if the Members were just idiots, or if they were trying to over-control the narrative. You could tell he was very knowledgeable about what he was talking about.
Full Patriot🇺🇸
Certainly didn't persuade the electrical engineer of anything by calling him a mechanical engineer so many times.
I am a Computer Engineer and the guy had a point about the grid lines. The presenter handled it terribly and said things that just aren't true. Things aren't ever "exact" they have to be within tolerance. I think the guy was trying to make a point that the machine should have been able to count them even misaligned. I would have responded that a 97% adjudication rate clearly shows that it DIDN'T count them right.
The presenter's claim that republican area ballots are poorly printed is interesting and would imply that the fraud effort started at printing. Would be interesting to have someone explain why some ballots didn't have bar codes.
I agree he handled it poorly. What the legislature guy was asking was correct, the black bars on top and sides are used to form a grid to locate the bubbles, and those appear to be correctly aligned.
The problem was some of the bars were about 50% too small. It didn't look obviously wrong but if the scanner is looking for a certain length bar it might consistently fail, which indeed was the problem... Very high failure rates.
Basically I would be asking the same question as that guy, it was kind of annoying.
I think the presenter isn't a very good presenter but what he presented appears to be pretty accurate. A forensic analysis should show up the issues quite well.
This guy killed it today. Controlled the conversation like a boss. I couldn’t tell if the Members were just idiots, or if they were trying to over-control the narrative. You could tell he was very knowledgeable about what he was talking about. Full Patriot🇺🇸
I was rolling when he kept referring to other legislature dude as "Mr. Mechanical Engineer".
Certainly didn't persuade the electrical engineer of anything by calling him a mechanical engineer so many times.
I am a Computer Engineer and the guy had a point about the grid lines. The presenter handled it terribly and said things that just aren't true. Things aren't ever "exact" they have to be within tolerance. I think the guy was trying to make a point that the machine should have been able to count them even misaligned. I would have responded that a 97% adjudication rate clearly shows that it DIDN'T count them right.
The presenter's claim that republican area ballots are poorly printed is interesting and would imply that the fraud effort started at printing. Would be interesting to have someone explain why some ballots didn't have bar codes.
I agree he handled it poorly. What the legislature guy was asking was correct, the black bars on top and sides are used to form a grid to locate the bubbles, and those appear to be correctly aligned.
The problem was some of the bars were about 50% too small. It didn't look obviously wrong but if the scanner is looking for a certain length bar it might consistently fail, which indeed was the problem... Very high failure rates.
Basically I would be asking the same question as that guy, it was kind of annoying.
I think the presenter isn't a very good presenter but what he presented appears to be pretty accurate. A forensic analysis should show up the issues quite well.