This means poll workers were forced to do the work the machines we pay Dominion to conduct elections for us. We pay Dominion Inc to provide machines and produce software that counts ballots AND we have to pay poll workers to do most of the work those machines are supposed to do. In addition to fraud robbing us of fair elections, we're being robbed of tax dollars by a company that is taking government money and not providing us with the services that we pay them to provide. This also explains why certain states that used Dominion services couldn't finish counting a majority of the ballots on election night: the machines could not read them and the workers had to take over. That's why they had to work overtime and take breaks over several days. The machines were supposed to do all the work.
It was the misaligned printing of the ballots that created the problems. I'm not saying the Dominion machines are trustworthy, but Mr. Pulitzers focused more on ballots that may have purposefully printed to be rejected, then adjudicated.
Exactly, my statement points out that we are not getting our money's worth as an organization asking a provider who is not providing what we ask for. This is entirely separate from voter fraud altogether, my idea is that we can sue Dominion for monetary damage for failing to deliver an election system both on the software and hardware end. The subtle position I'm really taking here is that Dominion needs to be investigated, which will open up investigative measures that may lead to discovery of voter fraud. It's an indirect way to get past the red tape that they continually show the government. Once the investigating starts they'll find everything out, this is just a back door if you want to think of it that way.
YT blocks people from certain sites from viewing their videos remotely, they make you watch the videos on their site. Clicking the title and watching the video is usually the only way to watch YT videos shared using the share button, so often you'll see videos that start midway or at a certain spot be blocked like that. They often have the "video unavailable error" which is not the case.
This means poll workers were forced to do the work the machines we pay Dominion to conduct elections for us. We pay Dominion Inc to provide machines and produce software that counts ballots AND we have to pay poll workers to do most of the work those machines are supposed to do. In addition to fraud robbing us of fair elections, we're being robbed of tax dollars by a company that is taking government money and not providing us with the services that we pay them to provide. This also explains why certain states that used Dominion services couldn't finish counting a majority of the ballots on election night: the machines could not read them and the workers had to take over. That's why they had to work overtime and take breaks over several days. The machines were supposed to do all the work.
It was the misaligned printing of the ballots that created the problems. I'm not saying the Dominion machines are trustworthy, but Mr. Pulitzers focused more on ballots that may have purposefully printed to be rejected, then adjudicated.
Exactly, my statement points out that we are not getting our money's worth as an organization asking a provider who is not providing what we ask for. This is entirely separate from voter fraud altogether, my idea is that we can sue Dominion for monetary damage for failing to deliver an election system both on the software and hardware end. The subtle position I'm really taking here is that Dominion needs to be investigated, which will open up investigative measures that may lead to discovery of voter fraud. It's an indirect way to get past the red tape that they continually show the government. Once the investigating starts they'll find everything out, this is just a back door if you want to think of it that way.
Did all this "adjudication" happen without bipartisan observation? If so, toss the election out. It was ILLEGAL!!!
Why is that every YouTube video posted on the site tonight is unviewable?
YT blocks people from certain sites from viewing their videos remotely, they make you watch the videos on their site. Clicking the title and watching the video is usually the only way to watch YT videos shared using the share button, so often you'll see videos that start midway or at a certain spot be blocked like that. They often have the "video unavailable error" which is not the case.