Hi again!
I'm Justin Mealey, and I testified at the Georgia Senate hearing today. Our team provided hard evidence of voter fraud, using the same data the Georgia certified the state with.
Here's a copy of the testimony: https://rumble.com/vcay7j-data-scientists-shocking-election-testimony.html
I wanted to do an AMA so that people can ask more questions related to our data methodology, clarify items about the voting process which we painstakingly investigated across multiple states, and hear your ideas about we could better get the word out about the fact that we seem to be one of the only groups operating off of hard, irrefutable conclusions based off of data.
EDIT: Thanks so much for the questions (heading to bed) -- hope I was able to clarify a few things for you guys. We'll ask Dave (the head data scientist who also testified from my group) to come do any AMA tomorrow as well.
EDIT 2: I'm sort of back right now (9AM EST) so will be periodically checking for new questions as I refresh tdw looking for spicy memes to repost on facebook.
EDIT 3: (10:32AM EST) I'm going to post a reply to a MrCaveman (which, thank you for the question) that I really want everyone to read:
https://thedonald.win/p/11RO7PRc9Q/x/c/4Drwoe2gIJ7?d=50
When doing work that you deem is important, the most vital thing you can have is focus. A lot of the times that means putting to the side all of the noise that surrounds a certain path. The poll pads are the noise when it comes to the actual ability to commit fraud during this election.
If you were creating a system to enact a fraud, how many points of contact would you design for that system to interface with in the voting process? How many confederates would you need to enable in that system? One way we've discovered only requires one true confederate to enact in a county, and we've actually identified some of these actual confederates. Depending on how things go, we might have to just release that in a video in the future.
My point being, that while your intentions are good (as most everyone's on this site's are), they distract from the actual fraud. By distracting from the actual fraud, parts of which we've proved through hard data analysis, it actually detracts from the ability for us to bring that fraud to light and abolish it.
Please, for the love of God, stop talking about poll pads.
Just want to say thank you Patriot! May God protect you and help you help the country
Thanks! There are so many avenues of fraudulent activity that we explored while looking at all of the states' data, that we had to narrow down our approaches to only focus on working with discrete numbers (not the fractional multiplication stuff people did previously), and to only focus on things we can prove without requiring datasets that have to be subpoenaed.
Hopefully today's testimony brought some legitimacy to a data-analysis perspective of looking at fraud occurring during the election.
All in all, our group just wants to save the republic and have the will of the people reflect in our elections.
Is there anything that Georgia pedes can do to help you?
https://1776.fun/ contains a list of contacts, and any help we can get to put pressure on the legislators to do the right thing would be amazing -- thanks so much for anything you can do to help call/email them!
Your name reminds me of a song I recently heard... https://youtu.be/lsV2K-6hDa8
Risky click of the day. Worth it.
Username checks out!
One of the low-key coolest things about it is the guitarist is 331Erock. You might like to look him up sometime, he's done a shitload of rock covers. Everything from oldschool vidya, to TV shows, to god knows what else.
Not what I planned on watching first thing in the morning... But thank you!
Brilliant reminds me of a thinking mans Darkness... Great song still wetting leg...
Brilliant
Truly a delight.
I started calling democrats only. The calls are shorter 😂 I drop red pills and tell them to have a great day
Thank you Patriot! I just have to say this...never thought I'd see the day where citizens of this country had to put "pressure on the legislators to do the right thing"...When there is blatant fraud. Sad, and disappointing. But, I'm hoping the swamp will be drained all the way when Trump gets inaugurated!
"America, FUCK YEAH"
The blood of traitors and rinos is a price YOU NEED TO MAKE SURE TO PAY IN FULL.
D’s, P’s, and A’s, people. And the P’s are only an inch and a half from being A’s.
Thing is they work for us. We should have been doing this all along. Keeping tabs
idk if this is your list but missing san diego CA reps... much love
Thanks, Justin for everything you are doing!
The lingo game is real
I listened live all morning- Dude, that testimony today was riveting, and it pissed me off that they were hurrying you up. Nice job, and way to manage the little bit of time they have you, to make a compelling case. The world needs more people like you.
I think Dominion machines, in part, originate from Canada. Wouldn't be surprised if Jussie Trudeau was taking kick backs too, like so many corrupt elected officials here in the States. Seems like it's a global plot, really.
canada is the money laundry of the world alot of corrupt things going on here.
You are definitely on to something. Mexico eats up a lot of our attention but Canada is passive aggressive and more subtle about screwing us over.
Build the (other) wall!
Do you have to turn in your rifles in 4 years? That timeline is on purpose, they know Canapedes will just shrug it off until it’s too late.
News to me. Any info would b e appreciated
Shirley you can’t be serious? Or you must be a city boy with no skin in the game. Canada said you have five years to turn in your rifles. DuckDuckGo might help.
City boy,,,that's funny Yea I knew about that order last year, I'm not too worried as there are groups fighting hard for the grand father clause for these weapons. However Canada has a couple of loopholes.
https://truenortharms.com/ar15_default_store_view/kodiak-defence-wk180c-5-56-nato-18-7-non-restricted.html Sets me back about 1300$ and another 200 for a red dot site but it's legal and all mine And don't call me Shirley
Grandfathering still results in confiscation, just slower. Grandfathering is no good either.
Thank you so much Justin. Good bless you and your family. Be strong Patriot.
Nicely said
Thank you and your team for your bravery and hard work. We appareciate you.
I haven't seen a lot of graphics that really show how blatant the rigging was.
Do you think it would be possible to make a webpage to create views and charts with the data? Maybe have some canned views so we can show others how obvious the manipulation was?
I've been able to show the election night stuff, but I feel it's important to bombard people with good graphics to really help them understand thr magnitude of what we've witnessed.
Anyways, thanks so much again. Happy New Year!
It's absolutely a great idea to do that -- the major issue was that we were so limited by time to release things, that we had to cut away any unnecessary (or less important) things and only focus on what could get the message out there the fastest, and what could make the message better understood while requiring the least manpower to put together.
In future elections, now that we're aware of all this blatant fraud, I think we'll have to have all that stuff you're talking about built and ready for the public to consume easily.
What about my analysis I did a while ago on the precinct tabulation log in Georgia: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TSN18YRIb0_q5MBNO8RUdRExTCXLl_b7/view in case you haven't seen it
Thanks for doing an analysis! Can you please put it on something not google drive so I can take a look at it? It's not loading for me.
Doesn't use Google - good man! I've had weird users attach themselves "edit" privileges at work on Google docs. I run a finance department at a very large dealership. I looked up the names and found that they were actual Google employees who gave themselves privileges to our companies sensitive docs. We have since moved on from Google docs
Zoho is good
That's incredible
https://easyupload.io/sryf7t
https://we.tl/t-PrzsFUsGH0
https://filebin.net/ae1bwzknke3dhsns/Detailed_statistical_analysis_of_the_fraud_in_Georgia_in_the_US_2020_election.pdf?t=5urid2q9
Uploaded it on 3 different sites for you, hope it works.
Thanks for doing that. You're a patriot.
We live in a PowerPoint generation - I totally agree, we need to explain this like people are five. Graphics wins minds.
Our intention exactly. The raw data charted out would only impress about 1% of the potential viewers, but 0% of the intended audience (legislators). You have to make the connections very apparent if you intend to broadcast things to legislators.
TLDR; legislators are fuckibg retarded.
I know you meant to say "fucking" but in my head I read it as "fuckbig" and I think I like that more. :)
Thanks so much for the answer! Is there any publicly available database I can query for some of this info your team has compiled?
Maybe I can try my hand at some report writing and graphical representations.
That is a really good idea
This is a great idea - people need to understand the step by step of the process involved in tabulating the absentee ballots, with a visual aid to indicate every avenue that could have led to fraud. This is especially important with the adjudication process.
I started doing something like that, taking the graphic that we had of the voting diagram and saying "vulnerability here, vulnerability here" etc., but it just didn't get done in time to be inserted into the video. We're just extremely limited by time right now as we push to the 6th.
Understand you are in a time budget - they’re probably all woke TDS superspreaders, but you need to hit up those After Skool guys on YouTube - the ones who do those great animated illustrations.
Absentee voting is a problem in the first place, because the chain of custody of the ballot is weak or nonexistent and not verifiable. Even more so when you use drop boxes instead of the supposedly trusted USPS. ONLY military should be able to vote absentee.
Never mind that the voter rolls are wreck (too easy to get on the roll and too hard to drop off the roll). Which is usually a step before any kind of voting.
Agree 100% - however some people still need pictures to understand this.
Good question. The most effective piece of data I've had in my arsenal since Nov. 3rd was a graph showing the margin of advantage for Biden in mail-in votes state by state. Most close states lie Tx, Fl, Ohio, NC a few more had Biden with an edge of +3 to a maximum of +15, but in Michigan it was +40 and Pennsylvania was +59.
https://imgflip.com/i/4s3qt9
I dug up the graph. I didn't screenshot the source data unfortunately. Someone challenged me on whether it was true or not since I didn't have the screen shot of the data source, but I did the math on Pennsylvania and saw it was about 60% for Biden, so I kinda took the rest on faith.
maybe, but 60% for biden is still a 20% spread assuming 40% for trump. and i would say that's probably realistic. i think florida was probably over 60% biden but i'm not sure how much, it's been a while. i just know it wasn't something like 3% and definitely higher than 10 or probably even 15.. i suppose it could've been closer to those lower gaps in some states
because he didn't just win by 5% in florida you fucking moron. https://electproject.github.io/Early-Vote-2020G/FL.html god damn it must hurt to be this stupid.
I remember hearing how close it was that allowed early counting of mail-in and absentee. That's why I was 80% confident Trump would win on election day, His reported over performance in early voting in some states. I'm pretty sure the extreme and mail-in advantage for Biden never materialized excepting those swing states. A lot of people don't like going to the polls in person like me. Oh! And remember this, I know some democrats that are still on this, there was paranoia about a Trump conspiracy to steal the election via the Post Office. In the last 2 or 3 weeks the Democrats were telling their people not to vote by mail.
yeah i do remember that. but all i'm saying is the fact is that biden had a 700k lead in mail ins in florida. that's a fact, going by the official numbers. it took 1-2 weeks of in person early voting for republicans to narrow that lead down to 100k going into election day. i watched this every day because i had 1k $ riding on it.
Shit, I don't even care if there was election fraud. You shouldn't be able to vote for communist traitors in the USA anyway.
Ok, thank you, Good to know. I guess mail-in ballots would still be coming in during the early vote period, but you'd assume they would still skew for Biden though perhaps not as heavily. Mail-in voting and masking being political statements for democrats. You know the folks that wear masks in their profile picks would mail their ballot even if they lived next door to the least trafficked polling location in the country.
Trump was ahead in Florida in early voting.
no, he absolutely was not, going by the official count. and second of all, i wasn't talking about early voting, i/we were talking about "mail ins" specifically. "early voting" includes both mail ins and in person early voting. don't jump in to correct me if you don't have this stuff straight.
but even with both mail ins and early voting combined, again going by the official numbers, trump was DOWN by just about 100k going into election day. i was gambling on this shit (on trump) so i was actually paying attention. not sure where you got your reports from but i'm guessing you weren't getting any and weren't following what happened. there are countless articles about how trump was down going into election night, here's just one: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article246891077.html
Hey beepboop, I'm just shooting off the top of my head here as best I can remember. I don't have the benefit of a calculator for a brain. I can remember the basic gist of the reports zi was hearing. Yeah, down about 100K on election day. That definitely rings a bell. I think they were predicting Joe Biden needed at least a 300k advantage going in to win. 11 million people voted in Florida . Over 65% of all registered voters had done so before November 3rd. Assuming 85% turnout that would have to be at least 7 million early votes with only 100k advantage for Biden. That's about 1.5%.
The statistical difference we are talking about has to be one of semantic confusion. I know that some of these states are not allowed to tally early votes before election day. Early and mail-in are possibly lumped together in Some and not the others?
Yeah, I'd like to see where the data came from as well. I do seem to remember that more registered Republicans requested mail in ballots in Wisconsin though and it was about equal for Michigan, unless that data was incorrect. So it's still odd. Not sure about other states. It's such a joke how nontransparent this whole thing is and how difficult it is to find basic data. I mean, where do I go if I want to see Georgia recount results vs. original for each precinct? How many ballots were challenged? Reprinted from adjudication? Etc. Seems there's no transparency in the system even at a basic level which is unbelievable. Oh one more thing re mail ballots - there's also the problem that the vote ratio should remain fairly constant with each drop since they get shuffled in the mail. Spikes for one candidate with wildly varying ratios don't make sense.
absolutely agree. EVERYTHING should've been more transparent. like the idea that cameras are banned from some polling places? or lots of them? there should be cameras up everyone's ASSES at those places. there should be one if not two cameras on every individual counter. and hell, those feeds should be live-streamed online where ALL OF US can be 'poll watchers' and click onto a map, go to a precinct, and click on different counters and watch what they're doing. instead they go the complete opposite and ban cameras. it's fucking ridiculous.
then they actually kick watchers out. the software itself should be open source. the source code should be viewable by anyone, the counting software. it shouldn't be some billion dollar company that's probably all run by liberals and get to say their code is proprietary. it's software to count shit for fucks sake! how impressive does this code need to be? there are probably young teenage kids who could make a program to count votes! and instead every aspect of these companies are secretive and nothing can be audited.
what's it like being so dumb?
Are you gonna keep digging your own grave? You can stop right here you know
Actually I'm interested in disputing Biden winning big on mail ins. He won a lot less than he was projected to in FL and GA, and as has been posted above, according to NBC.com mail in ballot requests by party affiliation actually favored Republicans in both WI and MI.
The rest of your thing I have no comment on.
https://electproject.github.io/Early-Vote-2020G/FL.html
click mail ins
Democrats 2,146,654 Republicans 1,472,826
i'm not sure it's possible to say biden won mail ins less than project in florida because nobody projected the kind of turnout that ended up happening. there had already been about the same amount of votes there was in 2016, before actual election day.
by the way to all the faggots down voting me, i mean again, republicans wanted to vote in person more because we weren't faggots and afraid of covid like democrats told us to be. this was a thing people talked about, guess you idiots just don't remember.
Speaking on margin, not net.
it's funny how you think my pointing out that biden won mail ins is concern trolling. it's almost like you have no idea what "concern trolling" even means. no, it's exactly like that
While I appreciate all who testified, it is unfortunate that Jovan's second portion where he was talking about the poll pads is completely false, as the poll pads' only job is to check people in at the Secretary of State's site, and are therefore connected to the internet.
It sounded more like (and correct me if I'm wrong) that all they did was get onto the same network (WPA protected which is easily crackable vs. WPA2?). Actually cracking the poll pad is another matter entirely -- it's basically an iPad created by Knowink Inc., and has no affiliation with dominion. Nothing can be changed vote-wise, and the most that you could do through a poll pad is search through the Secretary of State voter registration data and check people in. If a voter were marked as having already voted and went to a precinct to vote, they would be given a provisional ballot to fill out, so you'd still be able to vote and have that counted in the election.
We thought your graphic presentation was AWESOME. We LOVE Bobby Pitton, but he’s too smart for the regular human - those legislators were tuning him out because he’s just too smart for simple folk. We thought your presentation was PERFECT because it made the complex EASY TO DIGEST. I hope you all heard the ‘Wows’ from at least one legislator at the end! You all KILLED IT!
Thanks! And thank you for your support, patriot!
Second this! Thanks for driving home the point about the negative votes and all that you are doing. You might be interested in Matt Braynard's data. Look him up on Twatter.
I like Bobby too. But he is not too smart for regular humans; there is no such thing. He could communicate better if he decided to say a few key things, one at a time, in a meaningful sequence. But maybe it's better to assign him a translator, and let him do what he does best.
I will say this about Bobby -- I spoke with him on a call a couple days ago and he's an absolute patriot and a very sweet guy.
That being said, the data approach he's taking isn't a convincing one from the perspective of having to convince legislators to jump over a cliff politically. I think the only way we can do that is to pressure them with discrete, irrefutable datapoints that give them no corner to back into.
Thank you for sharing that strategy tip. Backing people into a corner is the absolute need here.
I hope you document as much as you can, if need be in future elections we need to create infrastructure quicker.
There is an incredible amount of resources out here that wasn't tapped.
Good luck as this comes down to the wire.
I agree...he needs a translator.
Maybe we need a translator.
I get Bobby. He reminds me of my brother. He just needs an interpreter? Or someone to give him analogies beforehand.
So if.. Say.. At the end of the day could you use this as a source of finding voters who have not voted? Maybe put together a list of registered voters who did not vote?
While it's perfectly fine that people are approaching things from that perspective, like I mentioned in the beginning of the testimony, it's just not our approach. We only care about things which can prove where, for instance, votes move from Trump to Biden. Those are the hard facts that are irrefutable as long as your dataset is correct, and our dataset is literally the same data that the secretary of state uses.
Thank you for your participation on this site and willingness to interact.
The weakest part of your team’s testimony: there was NO demonstration of a change in the ground situation.
Historically, were there ever negative votes or “switches” in the Edison data feed or similar sources? Was this particularly evident in 2020 in areas of notorious fraud? Or were there comparable events in 2018, 2016, etc? I am looking for a delta.
Not sure if you think this observation is on point, but some mention of this in your presentation would make the conclusion considerably stronger, in my opinion. Thanks again!
The Edison dataset was only a starting point. The dataset we're using mainly is the SCYTL data, which is 1-for-1 the secretary of state's data.
What level of negative votes would be okay? Would it matter that votes go negative previously, even if a single instance of it points towards a systems issue?
Along these lines, were there any instances of negative votes for Biden?
Just want to correct my error. Reviewed your testimony again, and it’s great. I was mistaken on anomalies... seems they first appear at county level, so I got that wrong.
My issue is with your fundamental reasoning. The exact flow chart is irrelevant.
In my model, there can be a “shared spreadsheet” type of interface anywhere in the chain.
Any office worker familiar with shared spreadsheets understands that updates from one user can override updates from another user. Data may appear “lost” in some situations; but eventually, everything can sync up.
It doesn’t matter whether my speculation is dead wrong. It doesn’t matter whether a human or machine performs the updates. Just the fact that shared spreadsheets exist is enough.
Your diagrams appear to assume a relatively clean and monolithic data path.
My objection is that I can go into your diagram and simply ASSERT that there is a patchwork of computer systems somewhere, instead of a single diagramed box. I’ll also assert that your team didn’t fully map out all the legacy systems in operation (even if you did). Any one of those systems could (hypothetically) produce a delayed update. Unless your team goes on-site and physically verifies otherwise, I’m afraid my objection is sustained.
Again, I think there was large-scale fraud and agree with your conclusion. That’s why I hope you can strengthen your analysis with an additional point of reference. What happened in 2016? 2018? (or perhaps compare with an area/state agreed to be non-fraudulent...) Why isn’t 2020 business as usual? Why aren’t so-called “negative votes” just the artifact of a patchwork of legacy systems that we always used for vote updates?
If some other point of comparison is not established, then unfortunately some variation of my line of reasoning above will defeat your analysis every time.
(Even if it’s wrong.)
Best of luck to your team!
Thanks so much for your response. I appreciate your level of detail. Your correction is noted.
Edison, by my corrected lights, is the precursor to network reporting. Scytl/SOS is where the negative anomalies would arise - undetectable in the Edison feed unless the refresh catches it at just the right interval.
My skeptical mind is not won over. Unless a change in the ground situation is demonstrated, then ANY level of negative vote tabulation is acceptable.
I’m on your side, but I would prefer your presentation be unassailable.
My imagination tells me that negative votes could result from any number of ground situations. For example:
Precinct A reports 1000 new votes. They send a region-wide spreadsheet with +1000 votes straight to the national reporting service. But it fails to include 1000 precinct B votes, because precinct B changes were simply not saved to the shared spreadsheet. So it appears that 1000 votes were “subtracted” from precinct B.
After multiple updates, auto-saves, and cloud communications, the results from precinct A and Precinct B sync up again. The spreadsheet data are reconciled a few minutes later.
If I were the opposition, I would simply argue it’s is an artifact of cloud computing. Therefore, I wouldn’t care how MANY negative votes were detected... my imaginary model explains it.
An easy way to overcome this objection would be to demonstrate a significant change from previous election feeds. That would produce a strong inference of intentional interference and clear fraud.
By contrast, while the “exact number” switches you showed were impressive and compelling to me, they are still only an argument from improbability.
I want to see an airtight DEMONSTRATION that something unusual occurred in the districts notorious for fraud. That would require some reference to or acknowledgement of 2018, 16, 14 etc data, in my opinion.
Again, thanks so much for your work.
I am not an expert in anything. My “imaginary” model is likely flawed, but it is logically plausible to a layperson.
Overcome that objection please, and shut down that logical loop succinctly in your presentation if possible. Then there will be winning.... the likes of which you have never seen;)
From a public support perspective, does it help to educate people on the vulnerabilities of the system like gaining access to data that otherwise shouldn’t be accessible?
I led a technical support team for years and we had processes in place to protect our apps users data and even a small gap would be plugged immediately.
I think the answer is yes, and that's why everything related to handling ballots needs to be observed by Republican and Democrat observers, and all ballots need to have a secure and unbroken chain of custody.
I'm glad you're being honest about this. After he made the announcement. My first question was what is a poll pad and what does it do? He made a vague statement about being able to connect to everything but he didn't say it with confidence. already tons of ppl are saying he hacked into the voting machine themselves and that really sucks. MSM will be able to debunk this while other more accurate claims are ignored.
That's my perspective. Things like that suck all of the oxygen out of the room, so that a true irrefutable data analysis such as the one we presented gets overshadowed by people thinking they hacked the Gibson mainframe.
So you talked about vote switching. The biggest criticism I hear to this is that a manual recount would have caught this. So whats your theory on how the vote switching happened and why its so hard to pin down? Also, who's testimony did you think was the most damning at the hearing? I really enjoyed the first woman.
A manual recount doesn't mean what you think it means.
What a manual recount sounds like is that you take original ballots and verify them. What a manual recount in georgia terms means is that you print out the ballot images, and verify the totals of the ballot images.
As you might have heard us testify about, whenever a ballot is adjudicated, a completely new ballot image is created and no record is maintained of the previous ballot image. Therefore, a manual recount will always add up to about the same total of whatever the tabulated numbers are (derived from ballot images), because you're just counting the same ballot images manually.
That's a travesty. I CANNOT believe that we have a system whereby the original ballots marked and signed by Voters is not KEPT AS A PERMANENT RECORD. What an outrageous system! UNACCEPTABLE.
This is something I did not know previously, and I have watched every minute of these hearings. I thought the person's original ballot image remained intact. So, they actually are deleting the original ballot completely and replacing it with a computer-generated image?
I am thinking of Jovan's offer to forensically examine the paper ballots, and I wonder if those even exist anymore to do so.
The adjudicated ballot image "becomes" the legally cast ballot.
So the original image is overwritten, and lost or destroyed... as a function of the system's design.
This really needs to be shouted from the rooftops, because almost nobody knows this outside of the few people (around here) who are really paying attention and well informed.
Is there any "official" reason why the records of the original ballots are not maintained?
Anytime anyone mentions Gibson, I think of the movie HACKERS! Hahaha
Yes and if a person followed all the hearings wifi internet connects are not suppose to happen or be allowed and the tabulators seemed to have wifi capabilities. When I heard him say it I was shocked!! Add this to Bobby's name theory and you got your fake ballots.
While that's true, if the real person shows up later, they'd be given a provisional ballot and then go through the ballot cancellation process, so as far as I'm concerned it's a bit of a moot point that doesn't have a widespread systemic effect that centralizing the voting system does, as it does in Georgia. Since data is transferred and centralized in Georgia in a lot of ways that it is not in other states, you have an avenue for exploitation where you'd only need one confederate vs. multiple confederates operating.
Doesn't this become less of a moot point when you consider that Georgia voter turnout jumped from 55% in 2016 to around 70% in 2020? Couldn't a well planned course of action be to register a ton of people who are unlikely to show up and then use access to the poll pad and a voter roll to turn them all into Biden voters?
Or simply wait until the polls close, see which registered voters didn’t show and then cast ballots in their names. That’s why the counting stopped.
This. A million times THIS.
Perhaps a register a bunch of fake unique last names that no one else in Georgia has? Exactly what Bobby found in his analysis.
Correct. A centralized system is more cost effective to exploit as the threat is likely to produce results on a greater scale (e.g. hundreds of thousands of votes in a single instance)
Your testimony was jaw-dropping.
Thanks for watching! Hopefully we'll get to present at other state legislatures before the 6th about similar analyses done on their states.
So far, every attempt to debunk our analyses has failed -- we've had multiple calls with people who were interested in doing that (and we even welcome it!). But, in the end, they could not refute our conclusions because the premises are sound, the dataset is sound, and Dave Lobue who you saw testify today along with our other data scientists are the real deal.
Why does that hard data not flip the states? That is more of what I said in another answer that politicians are focused on doing as little as possible while still being able to keep their head above water politically, because no one has the gumption to take the political risks involved with doing the right thing. The lower level state players are told: "Play the game, and if you do all of our bidding, maybe we'll allow you to run for federal office, or get you a job as a consultant or pundit".
Take that how you will. Either way, Donald J. Trump has given us a path to get enough people angry at this state of affairs that we might be able to move towards fixing that system, and that's going to be one of the greatest gifts he gave us.
It's why we have to ramp up the pressure and keep this movement going beyond Trump. We have to show politicians that they won't have a political future when they sell out The People
Not OP but it's corruption. They refuse to listen to the facts and when they do they actually listen to it they state it doesn't have a large enough impact which is a lie. Even if some information is difficult to comprehend they rather ignore it than spend a few minutes to a few hours to learn it. This isn't ignorance or negligence. It's flat out corruption.
Probably by accepting bribes or having little self respect since it's evident they have no backbone. I imagine if our side got a little rowdy most of them would cave. I think the fact that so far we've been extremely patient and passive only helps justify in their minds that what they're doing isn't that bad. We're not out there rioting for a legitimate reason unlike what we've seen months ago with people rioting for criminals.
Simple answer: they are psychopaths, so there is no remorse. Some more, some less. The ones on the top don't have any normal moral standards. They don't care how many people die if it means more power and wealth for them.
On a pile of cash, the power to screw others, and the off-chance to have steak-and-lobster with some big wig.
Because we live in clown world, honk honk
Because they’re run by cowards.
Cowardice. These people are too afraid to do what's right because of a vocal and vicious minority. It's important for us to support these representatives and show them we have their back.
Do you think that anything will be done about this? We've had plenty of overwhelming ironclad evidence for weeks now but it doesn't seem like anyone in the government wants to actually do anything about it
Most legislators are taking an approach of doing as absolutely little as possible while still maintaining some semblance of caring about the concerns of the people. I think the only answer to make the concerns of the people so loud, so that the legislators know that if they don't support the actual will of the people, they'll never be re-elected.
Why do you think this is? Do you think they're in on the fraud, or just scared? And if the latter, scared of who?
Scared of the ones running things, the ones with most power. There is a reason why such theories as 'Clinton body count' and term 'arkancided' exist. The powerful can ruin your career, your life and the lives of your loved ones or even get you/them killed. Fear is very effective tool for controlling others.
"He who has overcome his fears will truly be free." - Aristotle
"Fear does not stop death, it stops life."
Because they want to be like Feinstein, Pelosi aka the "get elected, never leave" crowd. It will impair their ability to have their career be a politician. If we had term limits, I think it may be somewhat better. Although, we also have Gov's that have teem limits and literally can't run again doing nothing.....I'm looking at you Ducey.
There should be no "career as a politician."
No one wants to be the black sheep, the first one to go against the grain. Human nature.
Well, they WILL be re-elected because they'll just rig all future elections. duh.
I think the only answer to make the concerns of the people so loud, so that the legislators know that if they don't support the actual will of the people, they'll be hung as traitors like our founding fathers would have wanted.
FTFY.
I would like to know the answer to this too. I have been watching all these hearings and this is the first time I have seen actual data scientists and not just antidotal stuff and people that need to scan ballots or recount. This is hard evidence that can be acted upon today. Let's hope someone listened.
Also in addition to my question, would you consider running for Office in the future in order to take down the RINOs? (Assuming we are victorious on January 6th)
There are certain folks suited for office -- I think my place would be helping get those people elected through my knowledge of data, online marketing, etc. in future, once we get through this difficult time before the 6th.
These RINOs are, in a lot of cases, worse than the actual democrats, because at least you know where the democrats stand.
You are absolutely on the right track here. This is our moment to build upon the Trump movement and sow a national political grassroot movement that follows the America First doctrine
Trumpism is here to stay
You need to provide really simplified graphics the retard sheep will understand.
Also thanks for being a patriot.
Have to agree because I honestly struggled with this testimony the most.
There's a major difference between intranet and internet. When we're talking about devices connecting to the internet, we're talking about something communicating with another device across networks. What you're looking at in that image are just wi-fi networks, which can be (and are in this case) mostly intranets without actual internet access. You'd connect to that network, be able talk to other devices on the network, and that's about it. It's necessary because of the nature of some of the command and control systems in the software employed at these precincts.
All that being said, the systems we have in place are bullshit. There's a reason media folks have constantly parroted back that "widespread voter fraud is near impossible to enact". It's because they're basing that statement off of the decentralized nature of our past voting systems, where we counted paper ballots, ballots were tabulated, and at every step of the way you'd have audit-able trails of paper.
That's not the system we have today.
Georgia in particular is the most centralized state in the union. It's so centralized, that the county doesn't even find out how the county voted until the Secretary of State TELLS the county how the county voted. Does that seem right to you?
Anyhow, focusing on internet connectivity of devices is a red herring.
What I’m reading from this is that bad actors would only need to compromise ONE node (GA SoS and/or his office) vs a multitude of nodes.
Wondrous security, isn’t it?
You would think so, but there are places in the topography before that which are just as vulnerable.
For instance, the dominion SQL database that runs a cron job adding up reports uploaded to it via FTP. All of the systems downstream of that just trust that data 100%.
Was that the same FTP server hosted at: https://dvsfileshare.dominionvoting.com/ Which up until the SolarWinds hack dropped and people caught wind of it, proudly showed a SolarWinds logo at the bottom of the page. This page was also completely unsecured http a couple weeks ago and they fixed it after being called out on Twitter about it.
I really hope you meant SFTP! But something tells me not.
I’m and engineer for a carrier-class network devices company. What you just wrote about Dominion’s lack of security protocol just made my skin crawl, and not in a good way. 😧
I get what you are saying, but say I was close enough or even in the room with these machines with a laptop (or thermostat apparently) that was connected to the internet (via hotspot or something). Then I hack into one of these Intranet nodes. That is essentially these machines being connected to the internet, and since one thing on the intranet is connected to the internet everything on the intranet is connected (pretty much bypassing any firewall/security measures). I am an automation engineer and one of the biggest security risks is someone getting into the intranet where all of the devices are. If that happens, those devices have minimal security that can be easily bypassed (if someone knows what they are doing) and they could easily be spoofed (unauthorized device making itself look like the authorized one) to send false data. Also, the Dominion CEO said none of their machines have wireless capabilities (lie).
I commented something similar. Just because they're intranets it shouldn't be dismissed so easily.
are you saying he didn't actually remotely connect into voting systems? or that somehow, being able to remotely connect to something that needs to be really secure, doesn't make it less secure?
I wouldn't dismiss it so quickly just because the network you'd connect to has no gateway to the internet. A network breach is a big deal because devices can access two networks at once. If I had a laptop with a wifi antenna and one with a 4G antenna I could let in and out anyone I wanted to their network.
It’s a lot of ifs. Actual hacking involves root accesses, co-opting api calls or processes for unintended actions, or disabling devices. None of those things occurred here, so as far as I’m concerned, is not hacking.
There are many types of hacking and yes what you describe are some of them but not all of the ways. By definition, "Hacking" is just finding a short-cut or compromising computer systems, personal accounts, computer networks, or digital devices. Another way to define hacking is simply as the use of technology or related knowledge to successfully bypass a challenge.
It's not that many it's. It's one. And only one of many examples.
The point was it shouldn't be dismissed solely because they were on a network with no internet access when the internet can easily brought to that network.
It's the first step. Gain access to the network. From there we get into the other things you mentioned gaining root access etc... But you have to start somewhere and saying
Is not at all the limit of the possible capabilities.
u/trumpsteaks
Anecdotal but a number of people today mentioned the Georgia hearings who normally don't mention political stuff to me.
I'm sure the FBI are working diligently with the evidence you provided.
Ok you can stop laughing now.
You and Bobby Piton are Patriots! Bobby said he would go back 20 years worth of elections and find more fraud. I’m sharing your testimony with everyone I know! Thank You for your Patriotism!
Hey, thanks for doing this today. Sorry you didn't get much traction after Jovan Pulitzer hijacked the hearing with the fake breaking news that poll pads are connected to RTR machines.
You will prevail.
Oh also, did you hear on the reps say "wow" during your testimony?
All I heard was the silence at the end, where there were no questions after being presented hard data of fraud.
I'm relistening to your testimony again. The youtube chat on RSBN channel was blowing up XD
21:13 in the video you linked for the "wow" btw
Thanks for sharing! Your testimony was compelling!
My AMA is what was you feel for the room? Did this feel like a group of people who are willing to fight this battle? My fear is that this hearing was just to appease us. Would love your opinion.
Thanks for all the hard work you and your team have put in. Please keep it up!
If it was a group wiling to fight for the people's choice and decertify, there would have been a back-and-forth, there would have been requests for the totality of our analysis in Georgia, and there would have been an invitation to speak further on the matter with them. Having had none of those things happen yet, the only indications I have are that the purpose was to appease and move on beyond the 20th.
So can we count on seeing you in DC on January 6th?
Seems like we the people are literally going to have to do something about this ourselves.
I've already taken off that entire week and have a room booked. See you there, fellow patriot.
God bless you and God bless America! See you soon!
It sure seemed like they were ready to leave. Maybe it would have been advantageous if your presentation had been earlier on? Who knows though. Politicians man...
Justin-How is Stacey Abrams not in jail?
This is awesome, great work!
Question: Has anyone from law enforcement contacted you to better understand the data?
Solid testimony. FULTON is an absolute cesspool of corrupt election “officials”. Thanks for helping expose it
Not a democracy. It's a Republic. Huge differences.
You were amazing 💙
So are you. Tell Igor Hi!
He says hi lol and says he can't wait for the 6th! Of course he's not coming but he's excited anyway.
I know what he thinks
I think that they think that you think about M&M's
👀👀
Hahahahaha
data people say these late night vote spikes in various states were statistically impossible, can you explain how it’s impossible so that normies can digest it?
We’ve been saying “it’s statistically impossible” for weeks but no one actually gave info on how or why it’s impossible
Thank you, Justin. Fantastic job today, brother! I just want to say, I'm glad you're on our side and one of the good guys.
I'm only on the side of liberty, freedom, and justice, and it just so happens that that puts me on the side of everyone here. Isn't it sad that there a side counter to liberty, freedom, and justice?
I know man, it really is very sad. I served proudly for my country and it saddens me to the core to see what our country is becoming because of the evil left and those Americans who blindly follow them. We live in a world where people rely on instantaneous gratification to form their opinions, as well as celebrity tweets, memes, and so on. They have been so dumbed down that they can't think for themselves, or even bother going out of their way to do their own research.
Thank you. There’s several groups, including Solomon and Shiva. Have you looked into any of their stuff? Keep Up the fight, and fuck them.
based updoot
First off, thank you for coming forward.
Question: has anyone told you to be prepared to testify in front of the federal gov house/Senate or the SCOTUS?
This is a bit off topic, but nice name. u/TrumpSteaks
Thanks for all you're doing!
How do you feel your testimony was received by the GA state legislature?
The three of you had an excellent presentation today. Thank you for your hard work patriots!
Thank you and God bless you!
Several questions, if you can share this with us:
What level of access did your team gain?
Did your team gain user privileges, or full root/admin privileges?
Did you gain full access to the full file system?
Did you gain full read/write privileges?
If you cannot or should not post such information without compromising your team and your work, that is understood. If you cannot get specific, please just say how bad and dumb the vulnerabilities were on a scale of "it was just bad enough to be useful" to "these people were so arrogantly stupid we'd need warehouses of MRI's to diagnose how unfortunately funny this is".
Thank you for having the courage to do the right thing!
Open source the all of the underlying data and methodology. Blast it out and offer a reward for a successful challenge to your conclusions.
I think you guys and Ed Solomon are right on point, But wonder why SMOTE is not being considered the source algorithm. Seems apparent.
I have only one question; what is our current status? The whole Mainstream Media is acting like the Biden is President and we should stop asking questions. I’m still praying there is hope!
Just want to say your data is probably the most clear evidence of fraud at a systemic level. We shouldn't even need it. Each and every state that is in this mess right now violated their own laws in this election and many the constitution.
Thank you for your hard work patriot! I am very grateful
Great work!
What sense of urgency did you get from the board members? I saw the one guy who made it clear he was on our side, but the thing is the certification happens in a mere week, not counting New Years' off. Was it stated that this process needs to expedited?
From a Peach State Pede, thank you.
Thank you for sharing. Georgia is a different situation because I think it’s the only swing state that exclusively uses Dominion across the board. Is there any way you can review the Dominion testimony in Michigan against the data and information you have? It would be helpful to understand that. I thought, and I could be wrong, that they suggested that votes were not sent outside the country. Or, is it a nuance that they’re not technically “counted” outside the country?
I appreciated your testimony today very much, thank you for your hard work!
he’s also answering non data methodology questions too
o7
Justin, were you nervous about being publicly involved?
I'd like to express my thanks as well. I wish they would have provided more time to speak. Hopefully your data was still officially entered into record.
Hi Justin,
I just wanted to start off by saying I appreciate the work your team did, and your testimony in the Georgia Senate today.
Do you believe that the GA state legislature will certify the alternate slate of electors that the GOP put forward to be counted on Jan 6th?
If you could make a single brief summary that normies could digest to be red pilled, how would you word it?
What is your personal prediction for Jan 6th?
Are there any process errors that you have seen evidence of occurring regarding the state of Georgia?
is it ever ok for votes to go negative? If so, is it ok for it to happen 100's of times?
I think that’s obvious lol
dominion needs to be banned from operating in the US