Hi again!
I'm Justin Mealey, and I testified at the Georgia Senate hearing today. Our team provided hard evidence of voter fraud, using the same data the Georgia certified the state with.
Here's a copy of the testimony: https://rumble.com/vcay7j-data-scientists-shocking-election-testimony.html
I wanted to do an AMA so that people can ask more questions related to our data methodology, clarify items about the voting process which we painstakingly investigated across multiple states, and hear your ideas about we could better get the word out about the fact that we seem to be one of the only groups operating off of hard, irrefutable conclusions based off of data.
EDIT: Thanks so much for the questions (heading to bed) -- hope I was able to clarify a few things for you guys. We'll ask Dave (the head data scientist who also testified from my group) to come do any AMA tomorrow as well.
EDIT 2: I'm sort of back right now (9AM EST) so will be periodically checking for new questions as I refresh tdw looking for spicy memes to repost on facebook.
EDIT 3: (10:32AM EST) I'm going to post a reply to a MrCaveman (which, thank you for the question) that I really want everyone to read:
https://thedonald.win/p/11RO7PRc9Q/x/c/4Drwoe2gIJ7?d=50
When doing work that you deem is important, the most vital thing you can have is focus. A lot of the times that means putting to the side all of the noise that surrounds a certain path. The poll pads are the noise when it comes to the actual ability to commit fraud during this election.
If you were creating a system to enact a fraud, how many points of contact would you design for that system to interface with in the voting process? How many confederates would you need to enable in that system? One way we've discovered only requires one true confederate to enact in a county, and we've actually identified some of these actual confederates. Depending on how things go, we might have to just release that in a video in the future.
My point being, that while your intentions are good (as most everyone's on this site's are), they distract from the actual fraud. By distracting from the actual fraud, parts of which we've proved through hard data analysis, it actually detracts from the ability for us to bring that fraud to light and abolish it.
Please, for the love of God, stop talking about poll pads.
Thank you and your team for your bravery and hard work. We appareciate you.
I haven't seen a lot of graphics that really show how blatant the rigging was.
Do you think it would be possible to make a webpage to create views and charts with the data? Maybe have some canned views so we can show others how obvious the manipulation was?
I've been able to show the election night stuff, but I feel it's important to bombard people with good graphics to really help them understand thr magnitude of what we've witnessed.
Anyways, thanks so much again. Happy New Year!
It's absolutely a great idea to do that -- the major issue was that we were so limited by time to release things, that we had to cut away any unnecessary (or less important) things and only focus on what could get the message out there the fastest, and what could make the message better understood while requiring the least manpower to put together.
In future elections, now that we're aware of all this blatant fraud, I think we'll have to have all that stuff you're talking about built and ready for the public to consume easily.
What about my analysis I did a while ago on the precinct tabulation log in Georgia: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TSN18YRIb0_q5MBNO8RUdRExTCXLl_b7/view in case you haven't seen it
Thanks for doing an analysis! Can you please put it on something not google drive so I can take a look at it? It's not loading for me.
Doesn't use Google - good man! I've had weird users attach themselves "edit" privileges at work on Google docs. I run a finance department at a very large dealership. I looked up the names and found that they were actual Google employees who gave themselves privileges to our companies sensitive docs. We have since moved on from Google docs
https://easyupload.io/sryf7t
https://we.tl/t-PrzsFUsGH0
https://filebin.net/ae1bwzknke3dhsns/Detailed_statistical_analysis_of_the_fraud_in_Georgia_in_the_US_2020_election.pdf?t=5urid2q9
Uploaded it on 3 different sites for you, hope it works.
Thanks for doing that. You're a patriot.
We live in a PowerPoint generation - I totally agree, we need to explain this like people are five. Graphics wins minds.
Our intention exactly. The raw data charted out would only impress about 1% of the potential viewers, but 0% of the intended audience (legislators). You have to make the connections very apparent if you intend to broadcast things to legislators.
TLDR; legislators are fuckibg retarded.
Thanks so much for the answer! Is there any publicly available database I can query for some of this info your team has compiled?
Maybe I can try my hand at some report writing and graphical representations.
That is a really good idea
This is a great idea - people need to understand the step by step of the process involved in tabulating the absentee ballots, with a visual aid to indicate every avenue that could have led to fraud. This is especially important with the adjudication process.
I started doing something like that, taking the graphic that we had of the voting diagram and saying "vulnerability here, vulnerability here" etc., but it just didn't get done in time to be inserted into the video. We're just extremely limited by time right now as we push to the 6th.
Understand you are in a time budget - they’re probably all woke TDS superspreaders, but you need to hit up those After Skool guys on YouTube - the ones who do those great animated illustrations.
Absentee voting is a problem in the first place, because the chain of custody of the ballot is weak or nonexistent and not verifiable. Even more so when you use drop boxes instead of the supposedly trusted USPS. ONLY military should be able to vote absentee.
Never mind that the voter rolls are wreck (too easy to get on the roll and too hard to drop off the roll). Which is usually a step before any kind of voting.
Agree 100% - however some people still need pictures to understand this.
Good question. The most effective piece of data I've had in my arsenal since Nov. 3rd was a graph showing the margin of advantage for Biden in mail-in votes state by state. Most close states lie Tx, Fl, Ohio, NC a few more had Biden with an edge of +3 to a maximum of +15, but in Michigan it was +40 and Pennsylvania was +59.
https://imgflip.com/i/4s3qt9
I dug up the graph. I didn't screenshot the source data unfortunately. Someone challenged me on whether it was true or not since I didn't have the screen shot of the data source, but I did the math on Pennsylvania and saw it was about 60% for Biden, so I kinda took the rest on faith.
maybe, but 60% for biden is still a 20% spread assuming 40% for trump. and i would say that's probably realistic. i think florida was probably over 60% biden but i'm not sure how much, it's been a while. i just know it wasn't something like 3% and definitely higher than 10 or probably even 15.. i suppose it could've been closer to those lower gaps in some states
Yeah, I'd like to see where the data came from as well. I do seem to remember that more registered Republicans requested mail in ballots in Wisconsin though and it was about equal for Michigan, unless that data was incorrect. So it's still odd. Not sure about other states. It's such a joke how nontransparent this whole thing is and how difficult it is to find basic data. I mean, where do I go if I want to see Georgia recount results vs. original for each precinct? How many ballots were challenged? Reprinted from adjudication? Etc. Seems there's no transparency in the system even at a basic level which is unbelievable. Oh one more thing re mail ballots - there's also the problem that the vote ratio should remain fairly constant with each drop since they get shuffled in the mail. Spikes for one candidate with wildly varying ratios don't make sense.
absolutely agree. EVERYTHING should've been more transparent. like the idea that cameras are banned from some polling places? or lots of them? there should be cameras up everyone's ASSES at those places. there should be one if not two cameras on every individual counter. and hell, those feeds should be live-streamed online where ALL OF US can be 'poll watchers' and click onto a map, go to a precinct, and click on different counters and watch what they're doing. instead they go the complete opposite and ban cameras. it's fucking ridiculous.
then they actually kick watchers out. the software itself should be open source. the source code should be viewable by anyone, the counting software. it shouldn't be some billion dollar company that's probably all run by liberals and get to say their code is proprietary. it's software to count shit for fucks sake! how impressive does this code need to be? there are probably young teenage kids who could make a program to count votes! and instead every aspect of these companies are secretive and nothing can be audited.