Hi again!
I'm Justin Mealey, and I testified at the Georgia Senate hearing today. Our team provided hard evidence of voter fraud, using the same data the Georgia certified the state with.
Here's a copy of the testimony: https://rumble.com/vcay7j-data-scientists-shocking-election-testimony.html
I wanted to do an AMA so that people can ask more questions related to our data methodology, clarify items about the voting process which we painstakingly investigated across multiple states, and hear your ideas about we could better get the word out about the fact that we seem to be one of the only groups operating off of hard, irrefutable conclusions based off of data.
EDIT: Thanks so much for the questions (heading to bed) -- hope I was able to clarify a few things for you guys. We'll ask Dave (the head data scientist who also testified from my group) to come do any AMA tomorrow as well.
EDIT 2: I'm sort of back right now (9AM EST) so will be periodically checking for new questions as I refresh tdw looking for spicy memes to repost on facebook.
EDIT 3: (10:32AM EST) I'm going to post a reply to a MrCaveman (which, thank you for the question) that I really want everyone to read:
https://thedonald.win/p/11RO7PRc9Q/x/c/4Drwoe2gIJ7?d=50
When doing work that you deem is important, the most vital thing you can have is focus. A lot of the times that means putting to the side all of the noise that surrounds a certain path. The poll pads are the noise when it comes to the actual ability to commit fraud during this election.
If you were creating a system to enact a fraud, how many points of contact would you design for that system to interface with in the voting process? How many confederates would you need to enable in that system? One way we've discovered only requires one true confederate to enact in a county, and we've actually identified some of these actual confederates. Depending on how things go, we might have to just release that in a video in the future.
My point being, that while your intentions are good (as most everyone's on this site's are), they distract from the actual fraud. By distracting from the actual fraud, parts of which we've proved through hard data analysis, it actually detracts from the ability for us to bring that fraud to light and abolish it.
Please, for the love of God, stop talking about poll pads.
Do you think that anything will be done about this? We've had plenty of overwhelming ironclad evidence for weeks now but it doesn't seem like anyone in the government wants to actually do anything about it
Most legislators are taking an approach of doing as absolutely little as possible while still maintaining some semblance of caring about the concerns of the people. I think the only answer to make the concerns of the people so loud, so that the legislators know that if they don't support the actual will of the people, they'll never be re-elected.
Why do you think this is? Do you think they're in on the fraud, or just scared? And if the latter, scared of who?
Scared of the ones running things, the ones with most power. There is a reason why such theories as 'Clinton body count' and term 'arkancided' exist. The powerful can ruin your career, your life and the lives of your loved ones or even get you/them killed. Fear is very effective tool for controlling others.
"He who has overcome his fears will truly be free." - Aristotle
"Fear does not stop death, it stops life."
Because they want to be like Feinstein, Pelosi aka the "get elected, never leave" crowd. It will impair their ability to have their career be a politician. If we had term limits, I think it may be somewhat better. Although, we also have Gov's that have teem limits and literally can't run again doing nothing.....I'm looking at you Ducey.
There should be no "career as a politician."
No one wants to be the black sheep, the first one to go against the grain. Human nature.
Well, they WILL be re-elected because they'll just rig all future elections. duh.
I think the only answer to make the concerns of the people so loud, so that the legislators know that if they don't support the actual will of the people, they'll be hung as traitors like our founding fathers would have wanted.
FTFY.
I would like to know the answer to this too. I have been watching all these hearings and this is the first time I have seen actual data scientists and not just antidotal stuff and people that need to scan ballots or recount. This is hard evidence that can be acted upon today. Let's hope someone listened.
Also in addition to my question, would you consider running for Office in the future in order to take down the RINOs? (Assuming we are victorious on January 6th)
There are certain folks suited for office -- I think my place would be helping get those people elected through my knowledge of data, online marketing, etc. in future, once we get through this difficult time before the 6th.
These RINOs are, in a lot of cases, worse than the actual democrats, because at least you know where the democrats stand.
You are absolutely on the right track here. This is our moment to build upon the Trump movement and sow a national political grassroot movement that follows the America First doctrine
Trumpism is here to stay