Hi again!
I'm Justin Mealey, and I testified at the Georgia Senate hearing today. Our team provided hard evidence of voter fraud, using the same data the Georgia certified the state with.
Here's a copy of the testimony: https://rumble.com/vcay7j-data-scientists-shocking-election-testimony.html
I wanted to do an AMA so that people can ask more questions related to our data methodology, clarify items about the voting process which we painstakingly investigated across multiple states, and hear your ideas about we could better get the word out about the fact that we seem to be one of the only groups operating off of hard, irrefutable conclusions based off of data.
EDIT: Thanks so much for the questions (heading to bed) -- hope I was able to clarify a few things for you guys. We'll ask Dave (the head data scientist who also testified from my group) to come do any AMA tomorrow as well.
EDIT 2: I'm sort of back right now (9AM EST) so will be periodically checking for new questions as I refresh tdw looking for spicy memes to repost on facebook.
EDIT 3: (10:32AM EST) I'm going to post a reply to a MrCaveman (which, thank you for the question) that I really want everyone to read:
https://thedonald.win/p/11RO7PRc9Q/x/c/4Drwoe2gIJ7?d=50
When doing work that you deem is important, the most vital thing you can have is focus. A lot of the times that means putting to the side all of the noise that surrounds a certain path. The poll pads are the noise when it comes to the actual ability to commit fraud during this election.
If you were creating a system to enact a fraud, how many points of contact would you design for that system to interface with in the voting process? How many confederates would you need to enable in that system? One way we've discovered only requires one true confederate to enact in a county, and we've actually identified some of these actual confederates. Depending on how things go, we might have to just release that in a video in the future.
My point being, that while your intentions are good (as most everyone's on this site's are), they distract from the actual fraud. By distracting from the actual fraud, parts of which we've proved through hard data analysis, it actually detracts from the ability for us to bring that fraud to light and abolish it.
Please, for the love of God, stop talking about poll pads.
While I appreciate all who testified, it is unfortunate that Jovan's second portion where he was talking about the poll pads is completely false, as the poll pads' only job is to check people in at the Secretary of State's site, and are therefore connected to the internet.
It sounded more like (and correct me if I'm wrong) that all they did was get onto the same network (WPA protected which is easily crackable vs. WPA2?). Actually cracking the poll pad is another matter entirely -- it's basically an iPad created by Knowink Inc., and has no affiliation with dominion. Nothing can be changed vote-wise, and the most that you could do through a poll pad is search through the Secretary of State voter registration data and check people in. If a voter were marked as having already voted and went to a precinct to vote, they would be given a provisional ballot to fill out, so you'd still be able to vote and have that counted in the election.
So if.. Say.. At the end of the day could you use this as a source of finding voters who have not voted? Maybe put together a list of registered voters who did not vote?