Hi again!
I'm Justin Mealey, and I testified at the Georgia Senate hearing today. Our team provided hard evidence of voter fraud, using the same data the Georgia certified the state with.
Here's a copy of the testimony: https://rumble.com/vcay7j-data-scientists-shocking-election-testimony.html
I wanted to do an AMA so that people can ask more questions related to our data methodology, clarify items about the voting process which we painstakingly investigated across multiple states, and hear your ideas about we could better get the word out about the fact that we seem to be one of the only groups operating off of hard, irrefutable conclusions based off of data.
EDIT: Thanks so much for the questions (heading to bed) -- hope I was able to clarify a few things for you guys. We'll ask Dave (the head data scientist who also testified from my group) to come do any AMA tomorrow as well.
EDIT 2: I'm sort of back right now (9AM EST) so will be periodically checking for new questions as I refresh tdw looking for spicy memes to repost on facebook.
EDIT 3: (10:32AM EST) I'm going to post a reply to a MrCaveman (which, thank you for the question) that I really want everyone to read:
https://thedonald.win/p/11RO7PRc9Q/x/c/4Drwoe2gIJ7?d=50
When doing work that you deem is important, the most vital thing you can have is focus. A lot of the times that means putting to the side all of the noise that surrounds a certain path. The poll pads are the noise when it comes to the actual ability to commit fraud during this election.
If you were creating a system to enact a fraud, how many points of contact would you design for that system to interface with in the voting process? How many confederates would you need to enable in that system? One way we've discovered only requires one true confederate to enact in a county, and we've actually identified some of these actual confederates. Depending on how things go, we might have to just release that in a video in the future.
My point being, that while your intentions are good (as most everyone's on this site's are), they distract from the actual fraud. By distracting from the actual fraud, parts of which we've proved through hard data analysis, it actually detracts from the ability for us to bring that fraud to light and abolish it.
Please, for the love of God, stop talking about poll pads.
So far, every attempt to debunk our analyses has failed -- we've had multiple calls with people who were interested in doing that (and we even welcome it!). But, in the end, they could not refute our conclusions because the premises are sound, the dataset is sound, and Dave Lobue who you saw testify today along with our other data scientists are the real deal.
Why does that hard data not flip the states? That is more of what I said in another answer that politicians are focused on doing as little as possible while still being able to keep their head above water politically, because no one has the gumption to take the political risks involved with doing the right thing. The lower level state players are told: "Play the game, and if you do all of our bidding, maybe we'll allow you to run for federal office, or get you a job as a consultant or pundit".
Take that how you will. Either way, Donald J. Trump has given us a path to get enough people angry at this state of affairs that we might be able to move towards fixing that system, and that's going to be one of the greatest gifts he gave us.
It's why we have to ramp up the pressure and keep this movement going beyond Trump. We have to show politicians that they won't have a political future when they sell out The People