Hi again!
I'm Justin Mealey, and I testified at the Georgia Senate hearing today. Our team provided hard evidence of voter fraud, using the same data the Georgia certified the state with.
Here's a copy of the testimony: https://rumble.com/vcay7j-data-scientists-shocking-election-testimony.html
I wanted to do an AMA so that people can ask more questions related to our data methodology, clarify items about the voting process which we painstakingly investigated across multiple states, and hear your ideas about we could better get the word out about the fact that we seem to be one of the only groups operating off of hard, irrefutable conclusions based off of data.
EDIT: Thanks so much for the questions (heading to bed) -- hope I was able to clarify a few things for you guys. We'll ask Dave (the head data scientist who also testified from my group) to come do any AMA tomorrow as well.
EDIT 2: I'm sort of back right now (9AM EST) so will be periodically checking for new questions as I refresh tdw looking for spicy memes to repost on facebook.
EDIT 3: (10:32AM EST) I'm going to post a reply to a MrCaveman (which, thank you for the question) that I really want everyone to read:
https://thedonald.win/p/11RO7PRc9Q/x/c/4Drwoe2gIJ7?d=50
When doing work that you deem is important, the most vital thing you can have is focus. A lot of the times that means putting to the side all of the noise that surrounds a certain path. The poll pads are the noise when it comes to the actual ability to commit fraud during this election.
If you were creating a system to enact a fraud, how many points of contact would you design for that system to interface with in the voting process? How many confederates would you need to enable in that system? One way we've discovered only requires one true confederate to enact in a county, and we've actually identified some of these actual confederates. Depending on how things go, we might have to just release that in a video in the future.
My point being, that while your intentions are good (as most everyone's on this site's are), they distract from the actual fraud. By distracting from the actual fraud, parts of which we've proved through hard data analysis, it actually detracts from the ability for us to bring that fraud to light and abolish it.
Please, for the love of God, stop talking about poll pads.
Yeah, I'd like to see where the data came from as well. I do seem to remember that more registered Republicans requested mail in ballots in Wisconsin though and it was about equal for Michigan, unless that data was incorrect. So it's still odd. Not sure about other states. It's such a joke how nontransparent this whole thing is and how difficult it is to find basic data. I mean, where do I go if I want to see Georgia recount results vs. original for each precinct? How many ballots were challenged? Reprinted from adjudication? Etc. Seems there's no transparency in the system even at a basic level which is unbelievable. Oh one more thing re mail ballots - there's also the problem that the vote ratio should remain fairly constant with each drop since they get shuffled in the mail. Spikes for one candidate with wildly varying ratios don't make sense.
absolutely agree. EVERYTHING should've been more transparent. like the idea that cameras are banned from some polling places? or lots of them? there should be cameras up everyone's ASSES at those places. there should be one if not two cameras on every individual counter. and hell, those feeds should be live-streamed online where ALL OF US can be 'poll watchers' and click onto a map, go to a precinct, and click on different counters and watch what they're doing. instead they go the complete opposite and ban cameras. it's fucking ridiculous.
then they actually kick watchers out. the software itself should be open source. the source code should be viewable by anyone, the counting software. it shouldn't be some billion dollar company that's probably all run by liberals and get to say their code is proprietary. it's software to count shit for fucks sake! how impressive does this code need to be? there are probably young teenage kids who could make a program to count votes! and instead every aspect of these companies are secretive and nothing can be audited.