84 Do you think when Trump appointed these three he ever anticipated this level of betrayal? (media.patriots.win) posted 54 days ago by Duchess +85 / -1 15 comments share 15 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (15) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 13 ▼ – deleted 13 points 54 days ago +13 / -0 ▲ 11 ▼ – freemoonlight 11 points 54 days ago +11 / -0 These three take the cake. I can understand Mitch Lindsey and others. But these three were really fought for especially Kavanaugh and Amy permalink save report block reply ▲ 11 ▼ – AlwaysReady15 11 points 54 days ago +11 / -0 Trumps appointments havnt really been great. Look at Wray and Haspel. permalink save report block reply ▲ 6 ▼ – Major_Sleazebag 6 points 54 days ago +6 / -0 Don’t forget Barr and Sessions! permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 6 ▼ – MadeinUSAquality1 6 points 54 days ago +6 / -0 He has to do with what they( the swamp or RINOs) give him. Swamp rat or swamp snake? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – becky21k1 3 points 54 days ago +3 / -0 Wray was just the next guy in line, I thought. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – I_no_asshoe 7 points 54 days ago +7 / -0 Not a set of balls between the three of them. Sad. permalink save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – garydavis11 7 points 54 days ago +7 / -0 no permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – ChuckedBeef 4 points 54 days ago +4 / -0 Betrayal of the Constitution of the United States. "No standing" Fuck all three of those frauds. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – DEPORT_DOOMERS 2 points 54 days ago +2 / -0 How can you get good picks when everyone in politics is deepstate? Why do you think he surrounds himself with non politicians all the time? permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – sleepydude 2 points 54 days ago +4 / -2 I don't think it was ever a part of the plan to rely on the courts. More or less, after they got to the position they figured out they were actually hostages there. If Trump was to rely on the SCOTUS, he would have had to get rid of Roberts first. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – PhiladelphiaEagles 2 points 54 days ago +2 / -0 Don't know enough about the scotus rules to say for sure they've betrayed him, which is probably what they want if they did. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Krat 1 point 54 days ago +1 / -0 They abandoned morality for academic legacy interpretation permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 54 days ago +2 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – MissoulaWes1776 1 point 54 days ago +1 / -0 They wimped out. They wimped out in a way that our founders could not have foreseen. However, we shouldnt count on the courts to issue winners and losers in all of our fights, some of our fights are ours alone to win, or lose. permalink save report block reply
These three take the cake. I can understand Mitch Lindsey and others. But these three were really fought for especially Kavanaugh and Amy
Trumps appointments havnt really been great. Look at Wray and Haspel.
Don’t forget Barr and Sessions!
He has to do with what they( the swamp or RINOs) give him. Swamp rat or swamp snake?
Wray was just the next guy in line, I thought.
Not a set of balls between the three of them. Sad.
no
Betrayal of the Constitution of the United States.
"No standing"
Fuck all three of those frauds.
How can you get good picks when everyone in politics is deepstate? Why do you think he surrounds himself with non politicians all the time?
I don't think it was ever a part of the plan to rely on the courts.
More or less, after they got to the position they figured out they were actually hostages there.
If Trump was to rely on the SCOTUS, he would have had to get rid of Roberts first.
Don't know enough about the scotus rules to say for sure they've betrayed him, which is probably what they want if they did.
They abandoned morality for academic legacy interpretation
They wimped out. They wimped out in a way that our founders could not have foreseen. However, we shouldnt count on the courts to issue winners and losers in all of our fights, some of our fights are ours alone to win, or lose.