We all know how easily hackable these machines are hell even the democrats did before they started mass cheating back when they fucked up their plan to slow roll the ballot instead of dumping them all at once. All those news segmants they made on the topic. But to just walk up to the podium and make that claim without backing..was unimpressive to me nd to people looking for any reason to dismiss this dude's testimony. I think it was actually a dumb move. Personally, i think the hack was the least important part of the testimony. The next part when he talking about the paper code or whatever. And how the code made it so the machines read the ballots wrong and that he could tell whether any ballot was fake or not and how they commit fraud through the error rate...that was insane. That was the bombshell of his testimony. And i think it's what we should b focused on because it reenforces our message. SHOW US THE BALLOTS what are you hiding. It was something even normies could see. Small enough that your not required to believe in a massive conspiracy no matter how true. All you have to do is believe is there was one person printing off ballots. And i think that's a lot more digestible. Maybe I am mssing something, if i am let me know but that's just my take.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
If you only knew what it meant to balance a wheel to -0.0004% with caught ratio transfers.
Look I'm not going to pretend to understand any of this. But i would think showing something that multiple people would have the ability to verify should have happened.
I made a simulation video for the pubic to see it live and how it easy it is so they can understand it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
If people don't believe the machines can actually be hacked (and a lot of idiots don't) they'll never believe anything else.
he wasn't proving anything to us, he was showing precisely how it can occur.
Yes, I think it was meant to be like a big explosion in a movie - it can't be ignored.
Except he didn't.at least not from what I saw. He showed how the paper ballots can be used to make the machine do something in great detail even i felt like i understood and I'm basically illiterate when it comes to this kind of thing but the hack thing he just walked up to the podium said it happened they asked what machine it was he said the polling thing and then something about a Thermometer trick and then they just...moved on like that wasn't a massive deal what he just said. Why didn't they show real time th being in the machine?
Microsoft itself once put out a bulletin alerting to Internet-connected thermostats being accessed by hackers.
Yeah that's what I said everyone knows these machines can be hacked. After the last election they ran segment after segmant on it. Even before the election they were talking about how trump might steal the election with russian hackers or whatever. These machines even on mainstream news have been hacked.i think they even showed a news segmant of some teenage hacker doing it on air. But I'm just asking why didn't they show them doing it in the hearing? Why did they just say they were doing it?