4782
Comments (454)
sorted by:
240
Gmelindag 240 points ago +250 / -10

People if John Roberts adopted children to molest through Jeffrey Epstein I don’t know why people are questioning Lynn Woods intent!

129
ravioli_king 129 points ago +132 / -3

I suppose getting proof the kids are being molested would be good. Even the DuPont heir wrapping his 3 year old happened and went to trial with enough to convict him.

136
iPissExcellence 136 points ago +139 / -3

It sounds like Jeff may be alive....

We all know how manipulative the "leaked pics" were attempting to be. No point leaking a corpse unless you really wanted people to believe he's dead.

53
BarronVonSaltzburg26 53 points ago +53 / -0

What about Jizz Lane?

38
Unapologetic 38 points ago +38 / -0

In the pokey, drying out

24
DemsFuckKids 24 points ago +24 / -0

dreaming of young women

-137
deleted -137 points ago +10 / -147
50
DemsFuckKids 50 points ago +51 / -1

Do you think he deserves any credit for Nick Sandman or Rich Jewel?

40
deleted 40 points ago +42 / -2
14
ThePowerOfPrayer 14 points ago +15 / -1

Who said anything about Pence in this topic? What's your agenda here other than to shit on Wood?

13
wewongbyalot 13 points ago +14 / -1

Really hate this fog of war. I feel that most will be revealed Jan. 6th.

1
StrangeLilFella 1 point ago +1 / -0

De... ported.

34
EDDIT_IS_CUCKED 34 points ago +34 / -0

Yeah. When does a body roll around in an unzipped bodybag? Only for a photo-op.

16
minotaurbeach 16 points ago +18 / -2

Obama did that with Osama bin Ladin. A double was killed and they took possession of the dead body, then filmed throwing his body overboard[that there alone should have raised flags].

7
OGpsywar 7 points ago +7 / -0

"It sounds like Jeff may be alive...."

The communicating of that, to certain persons, was clearly the entire point of the tweet.

( .. wow )

January 2021 intensifies. 🔥🔥

2
AnonUSA2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

2021 says hold my beer here I come, baby!!!!

44
errydaktal 44 points ago +50 / -6

ACB also probably adopted through him

39
D0NNIE_DARK0 39 points ago +42 / -3

I actually wondered why Haiti of all places. Hillary and those cultic pretend Christians stealing orphans who have parents. It’s all very weird.

30
Pedeville 30 points ago +31 / -1

Best place to kidnap kids would be a country without electricity where their majority food intake is mud cakes. Yup, mud cakes. Made from mud

26
South_Florida_Guy 26 points ago +26 / -0

They're not mud cakes, they're Haitian dirt cookies.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
Junionthepipeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Flavored with magic motor oil

2
South_Florida_Guy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Full of iron and other essential minerals! Part of an incomplete 3rd world shithole breakfast!

20
D0NNIE_DARK0 20 points ago +23 / -3

They actually have a decent cuisine and were big on their pork until American aid decimated their native pig population. Haiti is numero uno on why NGO’s are trash and foreign aid is a cruel joke that makes countries worse. Talk to any Haitian about how they feel about politicians in the US and France and they’ll give you an earful.

12
FLatino 12 points ago +12 / -0

Everytime I get in an Uber with a Hatian driver, "so what do you think of the Clinton Foundation?"

2
D0NNIE_DARK0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Survey says: can’t stand them. I also didn’t know how much the Chinese are buying up the Caribbean. Our leaders are asleep at the wheel or on the Chicom Express.

11
John_Smallberries 11 points ago +11 / -0

Ummm, that ain't mud, brother...

17
Pedeville 17 points ago +17 / -0

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s3337cj4sJQ

Dirt cookies they call it

19
John_Smallberries 19 points ago +19 / -0

Wow, I thought you were joking.

It's sad that these people still can't figure out how to farm despite the billions (trillions?) of dollars that have been given to them over the past century.

14
NotDangerousGame 14 points ago +14 / -0

And Donald Trump is racist for calling this place a shithole?

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
Clandestiny 5 points ago +5 / -0

What. The. Fuck!?

😱

0
Junionthepipeline 0 points ago +0 / -0

The stolen kids are irish.

2
Pedeville 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah Roberts' kids, I was thinking more in general since the guy asked 'why Haiti'

16
Elijah27 16 points ago +16 / -0

I lived in Haiti for 11 years of my life. People have no idea the amount of trafficking that goes on there. The first American I met there ran an “orphanage” that he used to abuse children. It’s awful

6
D0NNIE_DARK0 6 points ago +7 / -1

That’s deeply disturbing. I’m incredibly distrustful of people who run any type of operation that serves the vulnerable. Especially if they have some kind of savior complex, the perfect cover for a covert abuser.

Our whole adoption system needs to be dramatically reformed. Even student exchange. I remember a story about pedophiles and other sexual deviants getting on those student exchange lists and raping kids who came here to live with them. Hillary was silent. There’s no background check or follow up with these perverts so they just kept getting away with it.

1
Blamera0000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus. Thats why the Clintons donated so much cash.

8
anesPEDEsia 8 points ago +11 / -3

Haiti has been destroyed. After France cut down just about every standing tree, and installed a corrupt monarchy. Average citizens didn’t stand a chance. Then came The AIDS.. so many orphaned Haitian children with no food, no job, no hope.

I can understand why people would want to adopt from Haiti. Just trying to provide opportunities to those who have absolutely none.

Across the river, the Dominican Republic.... same island. Different government. Different circumstances. More opportunity. The best most Haitians can hope for is to sneak into the DR and try to achieve some existence.

10
D0NNIE_DARK0 10 points ago +11 / -1

Dominican and Haitians don’t get along and have completely different cultures. No Haitian is running to DR after Trujillo. The best thing for Haiti, and most countries, is for everyone to leave them alone. There are probably more NGO’s per capita there than pretty much any where else in the world. What are the results? The medical aid after the hurricane brought new diseases, our taxpayer dollars helped fund Monsatan terminator seeds, our elected leaders rig their elections to put in useless puppets. We need to get out of nation building, world policing and all the other bullshit our leaders use as a cover for money laundering our taxes.

5
LibertarianXian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lots of Haitians still go to the DR to work as a sort of cheap labor class, much like Mexicans and Central Americans here in the US. For sure Dominicans look down on Haitians, just as the Puerto Ricans look down on them both.

Agreed on uselessness of NGOs and worse, how they are used for laundering money and human trafficking in these poor countries.

2
Mixchi 2 points ago +2 / -0

The reason why Haitians and Dominicans don't get along is due to the cultural differences and the stupid racism bs. After France destimated half of Haiti, other Haitians try to take DR to pay France with the resources on that side of the island (DR). Dominicans fought back and won, putting an end to the Haitians occupancy. Most Haitians believe is the other way around and that Dominicans "stole" their land. Because this was/is a constant idiation of Haitians, Trujillo happened and Dominicans don't want them involved in the culture and/or politics. Also, DR is heavily influenced by Western Europe on culture, religion and ethics (most of the population, you'll always find the unadaptable ones), while Haiti is influenced by African-tribalistic culture and pagan deities. Cultural Clash at its finest.

I have met dozens of well-educated Haitians in the USA and they agreed with me that our countries battles are base on idiocy and death ideologies. We agreed that the loser of a battle should accept defeat and build their own resources. Some of these people are Christian Haitians and do not agree with the practice of witchcraft and voodoo.

8
becky21k1 8 points ago +8 / -0

France didn't cut the trees down, the haitans did.

1
anesPEDEsia 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought that happened in the 1700’s when France was using slavery there. And deforested most of the island for coffee and fruit production

10
becky21k1 10 points ago +10 / -0

No they did it themselves for charcoal production.

5
DemsFuckKids 5 points ago +7 / -2

you're not alone. There are no conspiracies, but there are no coincidences - bannon

15
SquirrelsAreCommies 15 points ago +16 / -1

I hate that line. There are conspiracies. The DOJ indicted 13 Russians on just that charge. Plus we all know the Dems conspired to flip this election.

2
Licensetomeme 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah. Just a shame the notion of conspiracy gets thrown in with conspiracy theory which, in turn, gets thrown in with tinfoil conspiracy theory. They all mean very different things, and it amazes me how, even after all the declassifications of nationwide surveiIIance, the same side that believes Trump was in cahoots with the Ukrainians and Russians refuses to address corruption at the highest levels.....

2
D0NNIE_DARK0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Username checks out.

1
Fuschialucia 1 point ago +3 / -2

Haiti is right next to Puerto Rico. It would be easy to take American children to Haiti to be "adopted".

8
D0NNIE_DARK0 8 points ago +9 / -1

Maybe but they are actually taking Haitian kids. I’m not going down that pizzagate rabbit hole but there is a trend of taking children from poor countries with little oversight and basically selling them for all kinds of purposes.

9
MAGAA2020isback 9 points ago +9 / -0

Happens after every color revolution. NATO seizes the assets: oil, gold, minerals, gas, humans... and then they traffick the illicit stuff like weapons, drugs, and people.

1
Fuschialucia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they take the haitian kids to PR? Either way, it would be convenient for them.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
1
minotaurbeach 1 point ago +1 / -0

ACB? What about the Obamas?

5
namechangearoo 5 points ago +6 / -1

Oh how I hope not.

3
My2SonsAreMarines 3 points ago +4 / -1

Got any evidence? If not, then your speculation reveals you to be nothing more than a dissembling shill.

2
Kolob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haiti was popular because it was easy to adopt legally at that time.

6
they-see-me-trollin 6 points ago +7 / -1

same reason as why the globalists hate the philippines president. lord moynihan (of the british house of lords) was trying to establish a foothold in the region for pedo sex trafficking and drug trafficking. first his wife was brutally murdered. years later, the DEA extorted him into wearing a wire. then he was brutally murdered and duterte told the globalists to fuck off. now the western media tries to make him out to be some third world dictator, while the filipino people love him. an i don't mean they love him like north koreans or chinese people "love" their government. i mean go to the philippines and talk to the people and they genuinely speak positively about duterte.

-7
Deplora -7 points ago +18 / -25

Well, first it would be good to get proof that there was any connection whatsoever between Jeffrey Epstein and Justice Roberts' adoption of two children with his wife. Of course, no evidence whatsoever exists to support this claim. Self-promoting nutjobs like Lin Wood claiming they have information from an unnamed source is not evidence.

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
3
Deplora 3 points ago +4 / -1

Like there is an island where young Kids were kept? Like there were kids taking from Hati for sex trafficking? Like NXIVM sex slaves really happen?

Yep, all those things are true (though the girls who were taken to Epstein's Island -- at least some of whom went quite willingly, even though they'd already been sexually exploited by Epstein and his pals -- were all post-pubescent, so not really "little kids"). All those things being true doesn't mean YOU went to the island and had sex with underage girls there, much less that any adopted children you may have were adopted from a child sex trafficking ring associated with Epstein. And there's exactly the same amount of evidence that SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts did those things, as there is that YOU did those things.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
Deplora 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm not defending what Epstein did with very young teenage girls. But there's never been any credible evidence that he had anything to do with younger children. The idea that he was brokering illegal international adoptions to wealthy married couples is preposterous. When couples like the Roberts want to adopt a baby, they don't go asking jet-setting pimps to arrange it for them.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
11
Lasernuts 11 points ago +13 / -2

It also serves as a call out- as something as flamboyantly said from an established public figure against another is clear ground for a Defamation lawsuit- unless it’s true and don’t want to stoke the burning embers

7
edxzxz 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court is not going to file a private defamation suit - first off, Chief Justice is a public figure and the threshold for defamation is very high, secondly, he's committed to being non political. Sure, it may also be a factor that he doesn't want his dirty laundry aired out in the discovery process, but the first 2 concerns assure Lin Wood he can throw whatever accusations he pleases without consequences.

2
President_Elect_Pepe 2 points ago +4 / -2

I was with the first comment because it just states the facts.

But now you're just bordering on defending someones reputation.

And really this forum is NOT the place to be defending John Roberts reputation. He has the entire MSM to do that for him.

3
edxzxz 3 points ago +3 / -0

My point wasn't to defend cucktard Roberts, he can burn for all I care. My point is, it's no indicator of Lin Wood having a solid basis for his accusations to say 'well, if it weren't true, he'd be getting sued'.

2
President_Elect_Pepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don't need to argue that though.

Anyone who has a basis in reality understands the situation here. Wood essentially admitted it himself.

I guess that's why yo me it just looks like a defense of Roberts, because the other point is kind of obvious.

-2
Deplora -2 points ago +4 / -6

Roberts wouldn't even give passing consideration to the idea of suing this obnoxious gnat for defamation, both because he's a SCOTUS Justice and because nobody who matters believes a word of this nonsense. And Wood is a sufficiently skilled con artist to know that.

-8
Factchecker -8 points ago +11 / -19

Wood is a con man.

4
ChokingOnARedpill 4 points ago +5 / -1

Then why did Trump summon him to the Oval Office the DAY the pandemic was declared?

3
President_Elect_Pepe 3 points ago +4 / -1

Because most anyone in the world can serve a limited purpose depending on the situation.

I don't even think the guy is a total con-man.

But its also clear as hell per Wood himself that he doesn't have any real knowledge here, rather he is just attempting to (probably purposefully) bait John Roberts into a defamation lawsuit.

3
ChokingOnARedpill 3 points ago +3 / -0

I definitely think he could be part of a disinfo campaign on behalf of Trump. Both can be true at once.

0
conservativeyuppie 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol, you're going to try to argue that Trump's judgement of people has always been impeccable? Weren't most of you guys sucking Barr's dick a couple months ago?

1
ChokingOnARedpill 1 point ago +1 / -0

Speak for yourself. I'm tired of getting grouped in with the people on this site that take every single thing Trump says or does at face value. He uses pawns as needed. If all Trump supporters would read Art of the Deal, Art of War, and 36 Stratagems they would understand all this stuff better.

As far as Barr goes, I hoped for the best with him, but have always acknoweldged his Bush, Mueller, Ruby Ridge connection.

2
Trump4lifeandbeyond 2 points ago +2 / -0

I see you're being downvoted for asking about proof lol we are clown world

22
Mike_Pede 22 points ago +30 / -8

We know Amy Coney Barrett "adopted" some illegal young children from a shithole.

That makes how many of these FedSoc cucks who are big "adopters"?

20
bbxx 20 points ago +23 / -3

Big Mike and Hussein adopted theirs from their best friends. Weird

4
MudDog 4 points ago +4 / -0

Did Bill adopt Webb and Hillary's child, or is he just a cuck?

12
Whirlybot 12 points ago +13 / -1

However they were adopted, it looks pretty clear that they are living a great life compared to what they would likely have lived back in DR. As long as they weren't stolen from their actual parents.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
3
CuckerCarlson 3 points ago +7 / -4

As soon as I heard she was an adopter I knew the gig was up. Then I heard they were Dominican. Seals the deal.

15
Kolob 15 points ago +15 / -0

I don't think they are being molested, I think it was an illegal adoption because he wanted healthy white babies.

11
Kek_The_World 11 points ago +11 / -0

There is no evidence to suggest he adopted for the purpose of molest. Epstein was running in the upper echelon circles. He probably approached Roberts socially and worked very hard to help the judge adopt. Epstein spent a lot of time gathering things to blackmail people. Illegal adoption is blackmail enough.

I listen to everyone but I make up my own mind about things.

Lin is a believer as I am. I give him the benefit of the doubt. But you have to admit a cabal that requires a child as an initiation fee? I am seriously worried that Lin’s source is a psyop. They feed him enough truth to be provable and enough false stories (with fake credible evidence) to make him look crazy.

It’s not Lin I doubt. It’s his sources. Because this seems like a classic CIA demoralization campaign to me. Stir up injustice/anger coupled with nothing being done (powerlessness). Next step, convince someone to take action (false flag) let them be the fall guy. Then discredit whoever (guns, patriots, conservatives)

1
Kotrin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Epstein was running in the upper echelon circles. He probably approached Roberts socially and worked very hard to help the judge adopt.

Sure, a Justice certainly had to be helped on legal matters...

1
MudDog 1 point ago +1 / -0

And for someone looking to adopt, Epstein is totally the guy to go to for that

1
hansgruber7 1 point ago +1 / -0

Personally, I still need a better source that an anonymous reliable source. It's certainly possible, but I don't trust anything from anyone anymore unless it's backed up.

119
MYNAMEISBETTY 119 points ago +129 / -10

Lol so Epstein DIDNT kill himself. Cuz that nigga ain’t dead lololol. This shit gettin crazy. Fake dead niggas and dirty riggers everywhere. 2021 will live on forever. The year that we took our country back. The year that a massive fleet of helicopters blocked out the sun.

68
TeaMug71 68 points ago +72 / -4

Ithinkin maybe Trump kidnapped Epstein to use him for leverage in the upcoming election and subsequent legal battles. I bet Haspel nearly shit her pants when she bumped into jeffry at the mess hall in gitmo.!!

22
MYNAMEISBETTY 22 points ago +23 / -1

She was like fuhhhhhck.

16
MYNAMEISBETTY 16 points ago +17 / -1

Next to McCain and bill too

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
19
onesummerdream 19 points ago +20 / -1

Unless Kasich accidentally told the truth on CNN when he said McCain was “put to death.”

14
Miztivin 14 points ago +16 / -2

Didn't Megan McCain have a similar slip up? Interdasting.

Edit: Found them!

Megan: You can't kill him again

Kasich: Put to death

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
2
becky21k1 2 points ago +3 / -1

Megan can join him for all I care

4
MYNAMEISBETTY 4 points ago +4 / -0

They’re gonna dig him up and put him on trial

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
GreatBambino 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you, God. For killing John McCain.

2
Sombradeti 2 points ago +4 / -2

Haspel never went to Gitmo. On the plane ride out there she cut a plea deal. She gave up all the info she had and they let her disappear into Europe. I'm sure they are keeping close tabs on her.

6
becky21k1 6 points ago +6 / -0

lol they wouldn't let her go, she'd be lucky to be allowed to live.

1
LibertarianXian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've heard this rumor and it certainly fits the reality that she hasn't been heard from all December, but what's the source?

2
Sombradeti 2 points ago +2 / -0

Simon Parks

24
D0NNIE_DARK0 24 points ago +25 / -1

I have believed he’s alive giving all the goods for leverage in exchange for protection.

24
MYNAMEISBETTY 24 points ago +24 / -0

My body is ready for all these pedos to get what’s coming to them.

12
BarneyFranksNipples 12 points ago +12 / -0

Right? What’s the point in all the leverage and blackmail if you can’t use it to keep yourself out of trouble in any given circumstance?

The blackmail is to give you power over the ones blackmailed, but also as a bargaining chip for if you try to get taken down.

The only alternative is if Epstein were to be assassinated (and we all know Jeffery Epstein didn’t kill himself).

8
Pedeville 8 points ago +9 / -1

No deadman switch dropped. Ofc hes alive

12
BeardedNinjaPede 12 points ago +12 / -0

Epstein's Island was left "unattended" for about a month after his arrest and then the FBI went in and nabbed computers and whatever else they felt like. After that, Epstein didn't kill himself. I think the FBI obtained and neutralized whatever dead man switch he probably had.

9
Factchecker 9 points ago +9 / -0

He will drop that info in two weeks...just wait a little longer

7
D0NNIE_DARK0 7 points ago +8 / -1

This is reaching Q levels of crazy though. JFK Jr is dead. Everything else we will wait and see. If 2021 starts with aliens, I’m going underground.

4
ThePowerOfPrayer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Matthew 24:26

Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not.

3
deplorablepepe4 3 points ago +3 / -0

Plot twist the extraterrestrials live in secret underground cities.

1
D0NNIE_DARK0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nooooo!!!!

3
Aspielogic2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Epstein alive would also explain why Ghislaine Maxwell offered $28 Million to get bail - and was denied.

9
CerebralPimp 9 points ago +9 / -0

Kung Pow! Enter the Fist?

5
MYNAMEISBETTY 5 points ago +5 / -0

SHIRT RIPPAH!!

4
Wtf_socialismreally 4 points ago +4 / -0

HOW DO YOU LIKE MY FACE TO YOUR FOOT STYLE?

2
MYNAMEISBETTY 2 points ago +2 / -0

you broke a thermometer in my hands..

2
CerebralPimp 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol

1
CerebralPimp 1 point ago +1 / -0

LoL

2
Mean_MAGA_Facka 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not a doctor, but shouldn't there be some blood or something. Not just some stomach plug knocked out?

1
CerebralPimp 1 point ago +1 / -0

LoL

2
Winterds001 2 points ago +2 / -0

weeeuuuu weuuuuu weuuuuu weeeeeuuuu

1
CerebralPimp 1 point ago +1 / -0

Holy crap that’s funny

1
LiberalismIsTheVirus 1 point ago +1 / -0

My nipples look like milk duds

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
9
MYNAMEISBETTY 9 points ago +9 / -0

Gates is gonna be in the first wave of helicopters

1
MudDog 1 point ago +1 / -0

He probably owns a fancy helicopter we can use too!

3
HumanSomewhere 3 points ago +3 / -0

witness protection is my guess

89
NUCLEAR-KRACEN 89 points ago +90 / -1

Remember GEORGE W BUSH PUT HIM THERE. So let’s not forget that little fact.

60
deleted 60 points ago +61 / -1
88
Jaggie 88 points ago +98 / -10

To all the Lin haters: He is a defamation lawyer. I'm still waiting to hear about a lawsuit against him. Waiting...waiting...waiting. No lawsuit = he speaks truth.

49
D0NNIE_DARK0 49 points ago +51 / -2

The guy has legendary brass balls. Richard Jewell was a hero who got railroaded by the Feds and slandered by the press. Where have we seen this before?

7
THELEADERSOFMEN 7 points ago +8 / -1

Mm now I wanna watch the movie Clint made about him, get more background on that.

3
Tranquil45 3 points ago +3 / -0

Honestly, it's a solid film. Watch it!

2
Election_Quotes 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seconded. Watched it a few months back before I knew the Lin connection. It’s a great movie, and I love it (and Lin) even more now

1
Tranquil45 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didnt know about the connection until a few days ago too!

30
JBlaze056 30 points ago +30 / -0

He is making statements against public figures which has a different, and higher, threshold for proving defamation. Linn knows this varying standard whereas most other people do not. The analysis is certainly not as simple as "no lawsuit = he speaks truth"

https://www.minclaw.com/legal-resource-center/what-is-defamation/defamation-public-official-vs-private-person/

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Trundel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its incredibly hard to prove defamation of a public figures. Lin knows this thats why he’s tweeting shit without any proof.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you're a public figure, your odds of winning a defamation lawsuit is effectively zero. Lin Wood knows that.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump hasn't sued anyone over the "Soldiers are losers" story so does that mean that was true?

52
FuckXiJinping 52 points ago +53 / -1

Curious what Wood is trying to do here. Discovery I guess, but why?

72
deleted 72 points ago +73 / -1
58
iPissExcellence 58 points ago +61 / -3

I highly suspect Lin knows something about Epstein that we don't know.

Maybe "Epstein didn't kill himself" meant literally that. Maybe he's alive and the only way they could protect him was to fake his death.

It wouldn't be the first faked death in history.

32
BarronVonSaltzburg26 32 points ago +33 / -1

Don't forget Jizz Lane is still alive and able to share gruesome details.

14
D0NNIE_DARK0 14 points ago +14 / -0

It took me a couple minutes to figure out who you were talking about. Lol.

10
BeardedNinjaPede 10 points ago +10 / -0

Once you see it!

You pedes crack me up.

2
MissileToad 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm highly suspicious that Ken Lay is on that list.

-9
Factchecker -9 points ago +3 / -12

Lin is a known lair, dozens of his tweets where he claims to know something and have sources turn out to be lies.

13
deleted 13 points ago +15 / -2
19
deleted 19 points ago +21 / -2
-9
deleted -9 points ago +3 / -12
20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
-5
deleted -5 points ago +5 / -10
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
30
BunnyPicnic 30 points ago +33 / -3

Why? Fuck you. This man is the head of the supreme fucking court. His name appears on flight logs. I know, there's probably thousands of John Roberts in the world. But these people are all connected. I grew up with Clinton and Bush as my presidents during my school years. I think all of us thought the bushes and Clinton's were on different teams. LIES. That was an illusion. They are a uniparty, have been for decades. I would love a uniparty, if that party put AMERICA first.

16
D0NNIE_DARK0 16 points ago +16 / -0

Never really trusted either team. They have the same handlers. People used to point out that Bill worked for Bush Sr. in those early drug-running Mena, AR days.

5
Kolob 5 points ago +5 / -0

You were paying attention too. I remember reading about that in both the Wall Street Journal and The Nation. I knew it was true and it got no legs at all in the media. The WSJ used to be a fantastic paper

4
D0NNIE_DARK0 4 points ago +4 / -0

A lot of papers used to be decent before they got gobbled up by bigger conglomerates. During Reagan’s assassination attempt only one paper reported that the assassin had been a friend of Bush’s kids. They had had dinner just beforehand. No one else touched it or dug into all the other strange facts. You would think the VP who stands to benefit the most if the President is shot would be newsworthy.

Bush Sr. pops up at JFK’s assassination too. He wasn’t officially working at the CIA but just happened to be in Dallas that day to make a phone call to God knows who. Old Texans remember. Lots of stories about the Bushes.

2
Kolob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Holy shit, that one I did not know. I just looked it up and the families were close.

13
TeaMug71 13 points ago +13 / -0

I agree. OKC bombing is the one that opened my eyes up to the reality of a uniparty. Then 9/11, and now the election.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
BigleaguendTouchee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bingo!

Logic is a powerful tool.

3
GreatBambino 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interestingly, Obama and Hillary are on different teams with a few shared goals. Remember Operation Snow Globe? The Obama Admin used the FBI to do a sting operation on Hillary for accepting an $18 million bribe from a foreign leader. Yet, she was never charged. Then we find out it was because the Obama’s were going to use that as blackmail when she became president. Why would you need to blackmail someone on your team? Because they’re not on the same team. They work for different people. Obama’s handler is Soros. Who is Clinton’s handler? This is one fucked up world!

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

You mean the flight log that, on the line for 'John Roberts', shows the pilot was flying a regional jet owned by TWA from Palm Beach to New Jersey? On a fucking Thursday where we can look up court docuements from that day that reveal court was in session?

You think the Chief Justice just jetted off in the middle of a work week to molest kids?

2
BunnyPicnic 2 points ago +2 / -0

The more crazy the idea, the more likely it's true. Could you ever imagined in your wildest dreams the police commissioner in Minneapolis would allow his precinct to be burnt down? Did you know prior to November 3rd, that our election data is sent offshore? Do we have video evidence of Roberts in the chambers on that day?

Do you think they just now started breaking the law and fucking us raw dog?

7
grumps 7 points ago +7 / -0

Because it would bury roberts

3
Sheprecon31 3 points ago +8 / -5

Listen you don't say shit like that and not have somthing

5
Brucesky420 5 points ago +6 / -1

Then you obviously don't know Lin Wood. He says shit like this every day and has yet to provide proof of any of it

1
Sheprecon31 1 point ago +2 / -1

Time will tell pede

3
prayharder 3 points ago +4 / -1

Maybe he's letting Roberts know that he won't be on the scotus for much longer, and therefore Roberts should "make a deal" with the Trump team, to help make for an easier transition in January.

The fact that an attorney can say this publicly about a scotus judge probably lets the judge know he is no longer protected.

36
sneaky428 36 points ago +39 / -3

Roberts is satanic filth

32
ChuckedIntoAVan 32 points ago +33 / -1

Lin is baiting Roberts. The children came from Ireland, not Wales, which is pretty common knowledge. He’s begging Roberts to respond and to sue him. This way, there is discovery and access to Roberts. In a previous tweet, LW mentioned something like “Does Roberts know about defamation?” He’s goading him. I don’t know how I feel about Lin Woods, he’s either a new incarnation of Michael Avenatti or he’s going to come through with all his tik tok info. Not holding my breath, but hoping for the best.

7
prayharder 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wow this is the only useful comment in this thread out of like 30 comments i just read, lol.

4
Guffman 4 points ago +6 / -2

Yep... alot of distracters on the boards here trying to shittalk Lin Wood. Wood's claim has FAR more merit than the media "suicide" BS we were force fed. Until Lin Wood is disproven on ANYTHING he has said, I will not discount him. He is putting his hard-earned professional reputation on the line... what are the knucklehead sadsacks here putting on the line????

6
prayharder 6 points ago +6 / -0

I just realized that just cause this isn't reddit, doesn't mean people aren't trying to brigade us with comments and upvotes that are intended to confuse and sidetrack people here.

3
PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm thinking he wrote Wales instead of Ireland because he's stupid.

This is the same retard who filed a lawsuit in Michigan pointing out tons of fraud in counties... in Minnesota. Because he confused MI and MN.

The guy is a grifter. He won some easy defamation suits and got unspecified amounts settled out of court, which can mean nothing if we don't know how much. And for some reason everyone thinks he's a superhero lawyer of incredible talent.

When he's actually just a stupid nut.

2
ChuckedIntoAVan 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn’t know about the MI - MN thing. He could very well be a complete retard. I really don’t think he’s playing 5D chess, but I keep hoping all of his crazy claims have some kind of purpose and he’s not a Michael Avenatti style grandiose lunatic. But then I think Occam’s Razor, and I hope if he is swindling people that he gets an Avenatti style comeuppance also.

32
Sheprecon31 32 points ago +32 / -0

Had to be from Wales didn't it... Right Where's my pitch fork boyo

15
MaximoLiberatos-II 15 points ago +15 / -0

What about that 'Lost Prophets' guy tho right?

2
Sheprecon31 2 points ago +2 / -0

Balls deep in kidy clunge he can rot that fuck

6
Aclothorsomething 6 points ago +6 / -0

Slag this!

27
BDME 27 points ago +27 / -0

if this is true then there is no doubt the John Roberts on the flight logs is the same person

11
mundania 11 points ago +12 / -1

It’s worth mapping the dates and times on the flight logs to the SCOTUS calendar... We know where CJ Roberts was on argument and opinion days, and it wasn’t on Epstein’s plane.

10
trumpforeverandever 10 points ago +11 / -1

I mean, with this shit going as deep as we know it goes, the SCOTUS calendar would be child's play for them to manipulate. Or maybe the flight log dates have been obfuscated anytime along the chain. The main thing is that this would perfectly explain Robert's behaviour and betrayal of the nation, and it is almost certainly true.

4
ThePowerOfPrayer 4 points ago +4 / -0

A statement like this without dates and times is effectively worthless.

Additionally, on February 10, 2011 (screenshot of that date and John Roberts' name - https://i.maga.host/tMAnmXb.png), there weren't any argument or opinion days scheduled in the Supreme Court, so how do we know where Roberts was that day?

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/2010TermCourtCalendar.pdf

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well the flight log itself completely debunks this narrative, because it wasn't Epstein's plane and it wasn't going to his island. It was going from Palm Beach to New Jersey or something.

1
ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was going from Palm Beach to New Jersey or something.

As if the only place Epstein and associates diddled kids was Little St. James Island. Prince Andrew surely wasn't the only famous person who visited Epstein's New York home.

Bottom line, a John Roberts flew on Epstein's plane twice, and neither date conflicted with Roberts' Supreme Court calendar.

22
usuck911 22 points ago +23 / -1

This is good!!. Patriots should start shinning light on shady dealing of Chief Justice John Roberts so that he knows we know he is compromised. This will put pressure on him to prove to us he is not compromised by ruling in our favour for once on a big issue.

2
Foletado 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ability to blackmail people in power is the most devastating aspect of the Epstein business. People need to pay more attention to the immense power that holds.

22
SwampView 22 points ago +23 / -1

A man with no fear.

18
Tenspot20 18 points ago +18 / -0

Step Down Roberts!

18
SpicyAmerican 18 points ago +18 / -0

So, Epstein didn't kill himself??

15
LadyV [S] 15 points ago +16 / -1

I cannot say for certain, but I never thought he did.

17
kmillz 17 points ago +17 / -0

Me either but murdered seems most plausible. Him being alive 2nd most likely scenario imo but both more likely than him killing himself.

8
LadyV [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

I can definitely see that as a strong possibility.

Now, in light of what Lin has dropped, I wonder if Roberts had a hand in that somehow.

1
TheRedRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re not alone. There’s some that positively think it was a Roberts Order To ensure his secret.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't buy murder/suicide either way. He did have a previous suicide attempt, so what was that? A failed assassination he decided to not tell anyone about?

4
SpicyAmerican 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm thinking Trump faked his death.

3
Philhelm 3 points ago +3 / -0

That would be legendary

1
SpicyAmerican 1 point ago +1 / -0

Time will tell.

2
Whirlybot 2 points ago +2 / -0

No funeral. Whatever happened to his estate? Is that settled or tied up in court because of his victims suing the estate?

11
ServerTowerofBabel 11 points ago +11 / -0

Seth Rich wasn't mugged?

13
namechangearoo 13 points ago +13 / -0

He was murdered my two ms13 gang members who “stole” a gunfrom an officers car in said “muggin” where they didn’t take anything. And I’ve heard the body am footage from cops showed Seth sitting up and talking at the scene. Officers said he seemed like he would survive no problem. Right after lodestar said he would make an example out of the leaker.

4
Trump2000 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wasn't it an FBI agent's car, or am I mistaken?

14
Kagakansas316 14 points ago +15 / -1

Will Roberts sue over defimation? Nah doubt it

5
cnn_can_dox_my_balls 5 points ago +6 / -1

Truth is an absolute defense against defamation

14
TinyKraken 14 points ago +17 / -3

I suddenly realize Lin's game. He's an expert on defamation law, remember - he is BAITING defamation cases, so that he can get them to expose their lies via the discovery process. NO ONE HAS TAKEN HIS BAIT, THEREBY SHOWING THEY KNOW THEY'D BE FUCKED IN DISCOVERY!

2
Trundel 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s almost impossible to prove defamation against a public figure which Roberts is. Lin knows this and thats why he tweets shit with no proof.

Lin Wood is a fame whore who is successfully getting a lot of attention from Trump supporters.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

So why hasn't Trump sued everyone for defamation?

1
TinyKraken 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably because with the amount of libel thrown at him it would take more money than the US deficit in lawyer's fees, and about three lifetimes' worth of court time.

13
golinveaux 13 points ago +16 / -3

Kind of makes you wonder about other Scotus with adopted children.

10
RolandDelacroix 10 points ago +10 / -0

Nah, they're black. Most adoptions are minorities, you almost never get a white (high demand, low supply) without serious bribery.

11
DRKMSTR 11 points ago +11 / -0

There are plenty of white kids to adopt.

Most kids up for adoption stateside are a wide range of ethnicities. The only issue with stateside adoption is the return of the birth mother.

Many adopted parents have to face legal battles when a drug-addict mother takes them to court. Had some family friends spend years in court to keep their daughter who was so messed up from their drugged up birth-mother she had to be fed through a tube for the first few years. Add on top tons of medical complications and plenty of medical emergencies, the girl grew out of those problems and became quite amazingly healthy and fit in well at school (she was achieving a normal life). Then her birth mother came back into the picture.

After 2 years of legal battles they finally won, but it takes a toll on the parents.

7
D0NNIE_DARK0 7 points ago +7 / -0

But they are from Haiti and Hillary has some very weird dealings down there. Remember the lady trying to smuggle orphans who had parents?

4
MAGAA2020isback 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is true. Internationally, they're impossible to adopt (unless much older with very severe special needs). Domestically as a direct adoption, they command the highest price and there's no guarantee the birth parents will pick you. Adopt from foster care, and one is staring down the barrel of domestic abuse, molestation, drug use, etc.

A healthy blonde haired, blue eyed infant is a unicorn.

I'm also a little disgusted that they were 45 years old when they adopted a one-year-old. The fact they had fertility problems when trying to conceive in their 40s in nature's way of saying, "no shit, give it a rest."

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
Best4Business 10 points ago +12 / -2

I really want to believe what LIn is saying with a lot of his tweets, but there's nothing to really back them up. I know he's a defamation lawyer, but the guy seems like our version of media. Just throwing out wild accusations to see if something sticks without providing solid proof other than "reliable sources say". I didn't take it from them, I won't take it from him. Either prove it and show damning evidence, or move on.

6
Elseebee 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is what seperates us from the libs.

Critical thinking ability.

So crucial in these chaotic times.

I am holding a "holy shit, let's see" attitude.

1
Best4Business 1 point ago +1 / -0

I want to stay hopeful with half of the things he's said or hinted at, but he's said and hinted at so much over the past month that it's like "Alright dude, times running out, you need to show some facts now."

6
ArtemisGordon 6 points ago +7 / -1

Why would you think of this as a wild accusation versus a very measured and thoughtful one? Given what we know of the circles that these elite controllers and politicians exist within....Podestas, etc? I absolutely believe this tweet.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because this guy has done nothing to establish credibility. Getting some slam-dunk defamation suits settled out of court isn't credibility, that's just him doing his job. Especially since we don't know what they settled for.

His claims have nothing to do with his job either. You might as well give him credibility because he was a good burger chef who made bomb-ass burgers.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-1
Brucesky420 -1 points ago +4 / -5

He's full of it. He spent more time pedaling his podcast than he did bringing proof of election fraud

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember how we raised millions for Kyle and then his lawyers pre-paid themselves and then funneled the rest into his #FightBack Foundation?

Their fucking client hadn't even been extradited to an arraignment hearing yet and they already were paying themselves.

9
TraitorJoes 9 points ago +14 / -5

Option A) Lin Wood is Bipolar Schizophrenic

Option B) Lin Wood is getting info from the ABC organizations

4
ArtemisGordon 4 points ago +5 / -1

How do you make the assertion of Option A? Is one not allowed to believe in Lin's tweet without being thought of as mentally ill?

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
1
Whatyougotson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Facial reconstruction and new identity in exchange for all the dirt he had so the blackmail just transfered hands. I hope there is a possibility and can be proven and not some 2 pac is alive crap.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
rusty_spittoon 8 points ago +9 / -1

I'm one of the people who normally thinks Alex jones is batshit crazy... But on joe rogan he was talking about how people helped ralph northam get elected and they knew about the KKK thing, and it was leverage against him if he acted out of line they would tell the world about it... Now I'm wondering if this was known when roberts was appointed so they could control him... Wikileaks also had some info saying obama was spying on roberts possibly seeing if he was staying in line

3
TacticalWitdotcom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do you have a link to thafcepisode- I want to listen.

1
rusty_spittoon 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's probably purged from youtube and places because you know, alex jones, but I believe it was mentioned on the second time that they had him on the show, not the first

8
AmericanMason1 8 points ago +10 / -2

Evidence or stfu

1
conservativeyuppie 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not gonna get that with Lin because he's always full of shit.

8
GodSaveTheWest 8 points ago +9 / -1

Cool, not gonna jump on a "sources say" accusation though. Thats what the leftist media does.

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
1
EdisonHwy 1 point ago +2 / -1

Monitor this

-2
ArtemisGordon -2 points ago +2 / -4

He is exactly the opposite of everything that you just supposed. He knows what he is doing, no doubt, and you demanding him to release his information right now is useless.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

What has Lin Wood ever done to establish any credibility?

When has he ever produced evidence for anything he's claimed?

6
AngelMark 6 points ago +8 / -2

99% of judges n lawyers are CORRUPT!

4
RC22 4 points ago +4 / -0

Y'all do know that Lin tweeted this morning that Epstein IS alive, not wouldn't it be great if he was

https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1344652363861258243

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
hansgruber7 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm starting to suspect he has gone crazy. I wouldn't blame him with what this year has been like, and particularly the last few months for him. But he seems a little unhinged to me.

2
RC22 2 points ago +2 / -0

did not it is still up

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
RC22 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are all on info overload :)

4
Klown_Kutz 4 points ago +4 / -0

If we had proof that Roberts didn't commit a crime, we'd be happy to exonerate him.

4
FullAutoFlintlock 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ho Lee Fuk

4
mrsucko 4 points ago +4 / -0

Going after the Chief Justice requires some big balls. I'll say that.

3
Habakkuk 3 points ago +3 / -0

And Scalia did not kill himself.

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Michael Avenatti and Jack Thompson were lawyers too.

1
prayharder 1 point ago +1 / -0

Would be funny if Roberts was already on an "execution" list slated for 2021, and if the Trump team had Epstein testimony about Roberts, while Epstein waits for a witness protection program...

3
prayharder 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know people who think Scalia was arkancided... I didn't know John Roberts spoke about Scalia's sudden death beforehand.

3
loxdeaddog 3 points ago +3 / -0

What makes this believable that Lin is a famous defamation lawyer and he is openly taunting Justice Roberts to sue him.......

3
jimzumaca 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lawsuits force discoveries

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Jutts 3 points ago +3 / -0

He went there. GOOD.

3
incogneato 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the warmup for the actual information coming out. Dropping it as cold fact, with no warning, would cause shock and resistance.

Lin Wood is serving a purpose by spreading crazy rumours and letting people get used to the idea first.

I can't imagine he'd be allowed to drop all this wild stuff if POTUS and other higher-ups weren't okay with it. They could shut him down immediamente if they wanted to. But they haven't.

3
Tantalus4200 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ho Lee Fook

3
Stormbringer33 3 points ago +3 / -0

Either Lin Wood has lost his shit, or he knows. And if he knows, a lot of people know.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
All4Trump2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Truth be told, he is one of the largest defamation lawyers in America. So if something like this is not true I highly doubt he would say it.

2
MakeFreedomRing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe those kids should be Dna tested to find thier real parents.

2
Smdlegend 2 points ago +2 / -0

Follow through with this then Lin.

2
Dale_Gribble 2 points ago +2 / -0

dude he keeps saying "if only he was alive"

my little mind is starting to wonder what the source really is.

2
South_Florida_Guy 2 points ago +2 / -0

100% looks like a creepy pedo to me, probably also an undercover fag

2
lovetrumpshat 2 points ago +2 / -0

He wrote this is today: https://thedonald.win/p/11RO7Txoec/lin-wood--i-am-fully-aware-of-th/c/

Epstein didn’t kill himself!

2
cnn_can_dox_my_balls 2 points ago +3 / -1

FFS, welcome to 2017, Mr. Wood.

2
pup1pup 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe it. Roberts is compromised.

2
RenaissanceOfHope 2 points ago +2 / -0

Holy f**k.

I don’t know if the allegations about the adoptions are true but this would make sense. Don’t deport the kids if the kids are happy and doing well though.

2
Neonlightdistrict 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is crazy.

Lin wood is a con man, or Robert's is a pedophile.

2
Kendoextendo 2 points ago +2 / -0

But..but Tim pool said we need to disavow Lin Wood. Tim’s probably hiding Epstein under his beanie.