291
Comments (32)
sorted by:
20
lst1194 20 points ago +20 / -0

You just asked and answered your own question. trying to stop all forms of delivered info.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
ChrisTheSoberITGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also explains why you need a license. Nobody wants to wait for the license, so the technology is dying with the boomers.

1
Easter_Bunny 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not true. There are more hams as a percentage of population now than there was 50 years ago, and the number's been holding steady for 20+ years.

https://www.clearskyinstitute.com/ham/stats/index.html

17
V43_of_ii_dim 17 points ago +17 / -0

All communication channels must be under strict control of The Party in order to ensure a dumb and compliant citizenry.

9
TyrantsAreCucks 9 points ago +9 / -0

They're trying to build a prison, they're trying to build a prison. (FOR YOU AND ME TO LIVE IN)

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
meme_oil 8 points ago +8 / -0

you can buy a great handheld for 30 bucks and you DO NOT need a license in a state of emergency.

3
lafingman0 3 points ago +3 / -0

don't you need an unlock code for certain stations? or is that a myth?

2
Easter_Bunny 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are PL tones and such, it's all unencrypted though.

2
Easter_Bunny 2 points ago +2 / -0

That handheld will product 2 watts, maybe 5 watts if you get an expensive one and don't care about battery life. The range is maybe a mile or two, it's line of sight essentially. With a nice shortwave or HF transceiver you can get a couple thousand watts going and talk all around the world, depending on conditions.

1
meme_oil 1 point ago +1 / -0

im pretty sure they want a handheld so they can use it at lafayette park....

2
Easter_Bunny 2 points ago +2 / -0

If that's the case, a GMRS would work fine. The article doesn't mention DC at all though.

5
Rogerdoger 5 points ago +6 / -1

Another question is why does the government ask manufacturers to not put shortwave bands on radios in cars? The test of the world has it.

4
Ass-a-Tony 4 points ago +4 / -0

because when the world falls apart, HAM radio will still be there

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
nc777 4 points ago +4 / -0

Remember when gov't encouraged civil defense such as radio, supplies, etc.?

3
HumasTaint 3 points ago +3 / -0

Movie "Pump up the Volume", pretty good.

1
Nearlydearly2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Movie "Frequency" pretty good.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
orange_dit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably the muslims. They are afraid of ham.

1
Dustin_Turdeau 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because they literally cannot control it. So their only option is to try banning it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Easter_Bunny 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay if y'all want to know anything about ham radio let me know.

You need a license for a couple reasons.

  • We're using frequencies close to military frequencies, and if there's encrypted chatter it could be a national security risk. I'm not saying I agree with those rules, but it is what it is.

  • You're allowed to use thousands of watts, you could easily take out military, commercial radio, police comms, etc. You need to know how to work the equipment you're using.

GMRS is a nice alternative, you technically require a license but nobody cares. The power levels here are very low compared to ham radio, but they're useful for line-of-sight comms.

There are just as many ham ops now as there was 20 years ago, it's just as popular as ever.

-6
tiredofwinning2020 -6 points ago +2 / -8

Probably because there is a finite amount of broadband and they most likely want to use those wavelengths for other things such as cell data.

12
APoxOnVax 12 points ago +12 / -0

Much of the Amateur Band is not suitable for cell data transmission.

-1
tiredofwinning2020 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Perhaps? But we also might not know of new technology that could utilize those wavelengths.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
meme_oil 2 points ago +3 / -1

negative. has nothing to do with cell phones.