1442
Comments (105)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
31
Nameless_Mofo 31 points ago +31 / -0

Why meaningless? Those markings are not meaningless to the machines reading them. I think she did a good job explaining why the machines would reject those ballots, and put that together with the fact that ballots can be "adjudicated" for Biden en masse and Trump can be robbed wholesale, it kind of puts all the pieces together.

-15
Unapologetic -15 points ago +10 / -25

I didnt bother reading past the puffery. It's pretentious.

I went back and looked though and i get what shes saying. Ive seen those marks. I understand CYMB print process. I get it.

ed: sincerely, master in electrical engineering

15
jamesfinmadison2 15 points ago +15 / -0

The reality is strangers want to know your qualifications before they believe you.

I only reject people's opinions who fail to provide an argument and use their title itself as a counter argument.

Nurses do this for Covid constantly to dismiss facts they don't like. This woman seemed to jump right into an explanation.

6
Unapologetic 6 points ago +6 / -0

Agreed 100%

11
Nameless_Mofo 11 points ago +11 / -0

sincerely, master in electrical engineering

Hey, me too!

"And God said:
<insert Maxwell's equations here>
And there was light!"

Only a EE would get this joke.

11
GlacialSpeed 11 points ago +11 / -0

That testimony was outstanding.

It showed exactly how they were able to kick so many votes out to be manually adjudicated - leaving it open for the votes to be switched from Trump to Biden.

Trump Won The Election

4
Unapologetic 4 points ago +6 / -2

That joke drove Einstein nuts

2
inquimous 2 points ago +2 / -0

I had that tee shirt.

3
Nameless_Mofo 3 points ago +3 / -0

So did I, our IEEE chapter at my college had them made. I kept mine for many years and only recently got rid of it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2