That's what I look for. The more they scream coup about Trump, the more worried they are. When we see their goons hit the streets, they're starting to panic. Jan 6th will b wild
It will be the first time any of those arrogant commie thugs paid by Soros face actual consequences for their assholery. It will be hysterically catastrophic for them.
If we have real gangsta ass pedes in DC, they'll practice a choreographed Broadway musical "gangs meeting in the streets" scene and have a PA to pump some funny music. Pantifas shows up and they spontaneously burst into perfectly synchronized song and dance. Be there, it will be wild!
No he was intentionally vague and obtuse, a key mark of a huckster, by the way. Republicans on the Judiciary committee released a report suggesting their was possibly enough evidence to decertify the vote and it should be taken up by a special session of the GA legislature.
It’s good. It’s progress, but we are down 28-3 in the middle of the 3rd quarter and Rudy’s tweet makes it sound like we just tied the game up.
I’m honestly sick of his self-serving ass saying whatever he thinks will keep him in favor of President Trump. GEOTUS is trusting him and he is crashing and burning in real time, but because the President is busy running a country and can’t be everywhere all the time, he’s not Able to over see every move Rudy is making.
It’s kind of like the saying “it’s not happening until people are in handcuffs” whenever somebody cries happening and posts a screencap of a tweet or something. That’s what we’ve gotten so used to this past four years.
We don’t count our chickens before they’ve hatched anymore.
Well, that is indeed what the RINO GOP specializes in in DC.
They love being out of power. They get to say all sorts of meaningful-sounding stuff without ever actually doing anything. And... take in all of that seeet, sweet influence-peddling money, of course.
Ummmm... he just did... Republicans on a committee released a report that suggests a special session should be called to decertify. He’s buried it in a sub point so he can lawyer his way out of it being a direct lie, but in plain English, he is obscuring the truth about what happened. You can tell by how many people here are confused about the meaning of what he is saying.
What I find is that when I am more truthful myself, it's easier for me to spot untruthful people. They stand out like a sore thumb.
Anyway I don't really see too many "true believers" on this site, just people who love their country. Right? What brings you to this site? Is there anything that you love? Honest questions.
You didn’t ask me but anyone who loves this country should be as pissed as I am that Rudy is now obfuscating the truth to loyal supporters. No one voted to decertify, and his lawyerly way of dropping it in a separate bullet point is infuriating. A few Senate Republicans on one committee released a report recommending a special session be called to look at decertifying the vote.
It’s bullshit. Rudy knows it. He’s hoping to string people along with more false hope, but I’m sick of it. If Rudy isn’t telling us the truth plainly than who can we rely on?
Anyone who is saying anything other than; “it looks bad, but put our energy into showing up on the 6th because massive public support for stopping the steal is our last best hope.” Is not telling the truth.
Anyone who thinks Pence is going to use some clever procedural tricks is ignoring the last 7 weeks of history. The uniparty/Dems have the entire process and the courts locked up. This is about public opinion only at this point. Until they realize that Biden does not and will not have the consent of the governed, nothing will change.
No, I'm not joking. Why give your enemies ammunition by telling lies that can be debunked by public record? That makes no sense, he'd be caught in like an hour.
Even atheist like me turn to God! WHEN HES REAL! HE WILL MAKE SURE TRUMPS SECOND TERM COMES! Through all of you faithfull pedes, i cant believe i type this, but BLESS YOU ALL!
I'm agnostic and have no problems with God but is it really free will if you're allowed to do what you want but you'll burn in hell for eternity if you do? Isn't that manipulation?
It's a very good question, one of the difficult topics about the Christian faith.
There are many thoughts out there but I can give you my perspective for what it's worth. My understanding of God is that He created the world and sustains it. Every good thing we experience ultimately comes from Him. But He was not interested in a creation that would just do everything He wanted, He gave us a choice. We first chose to sin, and this separated us from Him. He is absolutely Holy and cannot tolerate sin or evil. So He sent His Son to die as an intermediary, that if we accept Him we are then justified before Him once more.
That's the groundwork. So if we don't accept Him on this earth, when we truly have a choice (won't be much of a choice when we are standing before Him in heaven), then we will be eternally separated. That eternal separation is Hell, and it's so terrible because we are completely separated from kindness and goodness and love. All that is left is despair and hatred and bitterness. I don't know how literal the flames are, but it's absolutely a horrible place regardless because it lacks Him.
I spent many years in medical school and during training doubting my faith. I just recently came back, after reading about the Shroud of Turin of all things on conservapedia lol. I did some of my own research and I am convinced.
Plenty of Christian North Korean defectors and underground Christians in North Korea. Suffering of varying degrees is universal in this world. The point is that it doesn't have to be permanent if you use the fruits of it as a grace toward your salvation.
You can't have the ups without the downs. We're going to come out of this with another Trump term,widespread corruption exposed and dealt with, and more people than ever with more pride for their country than ever. God always has a plan.
Your relationship with your god makes you sound a like a simp. "My wife/god isn't cheating on me/letting satan win, we're just in an open relationship/have free will!'
No; mankind (actually WOMEN) fucked it all up for us back in the garden of Eden.
We were given a literal paradise and all we had to do was not touch ONE FUCKING TREE, but bitch couldn't keep her damn mouth shut.
Had to go & listen to a freakin' snek of all things.
Satan didn't even disguise himself as a puppy or a kitten; a freakin' SNAKE made woman throw away paradise.
Our punishment for not heeding God's instructions at the Garden of Eden is that we were sentenced to a hard, rough life, filled with work, toil, pain and misery.
Lots of joy to be sure, but lots of pain & hassle too.
I apologize if my post offended, as that was not my intent.
I'm simply stating the biblical and historical truth that woman accepted the fruit of the forbidden tree and caused she and Adam to be cast out of the Garden of Eden and condemned to a lifetime of toil, pain, and suffering as punishment for disobeying God.
Men sure as fuck ain't perfect...not by a long shot. :-)
Technically true I think... the Judiciary committee voted to decertify, but the entire legislature has to vote as well before its actually decertified.
No, we want to reform 230 to where it is actually enforced. If we scrap 230 it will be the end of all platforms including this one. Same with Parler and other alt-tech sites.
Youtube would just purge non verified or non mainstream channels. It’s the perfect excuse to remove the rabble rousing progressive and maga factions. They would only allow sanitized corporate propaganda.
230 doesn't cover only political speech. Removing 230 means every drama channel can sue YouTube because someone said something catty about them. Half of YouTube is drama channels.
230 isn't about content, directly. **It's protection from being sued over content. ** With no 230 protections, YouTube can be sued for every single video on their system, and every single comment.
This holds true for every forum, every image site, everything. If third parties can post to it, they're liable for everything on it. Imagine what happens to gossip sites like TMZ. It's an untenable solution because it shuts down all discussion on the internet. I read a discussion that removing 230 could potentially allow people to sue Yelp, for bad reviews of their company.
But we don't care about the drama channels, and TMZ still broadcasts on platforms outside of YouTube. I'm not saying keep 230 with it's current interpretation, but some form of 230 is absolutely necessary. Trump ordering the FCC to redefine their interpretation of 230 would do a ton of good. I'm not disagreeing with what you say but rather adding some additional considerations to your analysis.
Who cares though? If they shut down thedonald.win we can have thedonald.somethingelse the next day. If they shut down Twitter Facebook or Google they're fucked.
What do you think about the idea that if 230 is repealed big tech will just kick off all political commentary? Is it true that if 230 is repealed big tech will become liable for all commentary?
230 doesn't just cover political speech. It covers all speech. It going away can mean I can sue TheDonald because you said something negative about me. And have standing.
Yeah mon!
As a Venezuelan Trump supporter, the WORLD depends on Trump and his administration to fulfill the destiny that God has set up for them.
Conceding will mean living the rest of our lives in the shadows. (Look at communist Cuba 60 years in the dark. And Venezuela heading there soon, hopefully turned around)
Well they can't even hold session. The smartest part of the treasonou plan was to compromise just a handful of governors & Sec of States so they could run out the clock on Republican legislatures because governors are blocking them from holding session.
Actually they can, but it requires a majority of them not only to have the balls to convene independently, but the brains to understand that the Federal Constitution gives them that power. As it happens, either one of balls and brains are in short supply in any legislature, and finding someone with both is miraculous.
I wondered about this, but it is not to hard in this day and age to make an email list of Republicans and send, "Hey man, wanna meet up and vote?" They are not stupid and it will happen is the only logical scenario that will happen.
They're playing people with this "we can't meet becuz Governor hurrr." They're hoping people are stupid enough to buy it. They don't really want to do anything.
The silver lining is support for Pence and/or Congress to not accept the Biden Slate with the black cloud so clearly on the GA election. NOT POSSIBLE TO ACCEPT.
In a country with a free press, we would also know that our entire country is controlled by the deep state and corporations, and our government is not a direct reflection of the people's will.
Enough of us know. At bare minimum, tens of millions. In the American Revolution, it was not the case that all Americans were on board. A lot backed the King, many were busy (muh work muh family). Ever seen The Patriot? Mel Gibson's character requires one of his children being shot and killed point blank in front of his face before he moves his ass to help. All that is to say... Most humans are followers. There are more than enough Americans who see the truth that could gather and lead those unengaged, indifferent, and maybe even brainwashed. None of this is easy, or safe, it just requires some initial courage and organization. We seem to have the perfect vehicle here...
Because when massive corporations like twitler and facebook are essentially the 'public square' and benefit from the protections of section 230, but then act like a publisher and blatently censor political speech, meddle in elections, and 'fact check' with Soros owned companies to push their bias and lies, that becomes a problem for freedom in general.
We are making something better, and it involves removing those protections for those types of entities. If they want to abuse their power and behave like a tyrant and a publisher, then they can get sued out of existence.
Yeah you’re free to start a paper; just compete with these billionaires!
The next step is to go full socialist, like we do here in Canada: Yeah you’re free to start a paper; just compete with us funding our own paper with your tax dollars!
Shortly later the China model: Yeah you’re free to start a paper; just don’t be surprised if you get organ harvested in a totally unrelated incident!
There is clearly broad collusion between major media outlets to misrepresent, suppress and censor legitimate legal and political information. Combine this with de-platforming of alternate media and it's clear to any thinking person that a free and independent press barely exists in the current environment.
If you don't think the media and the Democrat party are colluding together on what the daily narrative/censorship is, I've got some swamp land to sell you.
Broadcasters may not intentionally distort the news. > The FCC states that "rigging or slanting the news is a most heinous act against the public interest."
They are all owned by the same entities and should have their broadcast licenses pulled.
When Google bans entire news agencies from youtube, and google censors basic web search results unless they are aligned with their political view, and twitter bans newspapers for publishing factual data that they don't agree with, that is NOT freedom of the press.
twitter then blocks people from seeing his tweet. How'd they do that without taking the post down, couldn't see it unless I went to some link a pede posted
Wait am I reading this correctly. In addition to voting to audit the physical ballots in Fulton County they voted to decertify Biden? Does that mean GA is done or does the GA House also need to vote before its final?
I agree with Giuliani 100%. The problem is this is all talk and no action.
More evidence keeps spilling out. Nothing happens.
More meetings with state election boards and legislatures. Nothing happens.
Do people realize that unless there is some form of kinetic action, that Jan 6 is going to be a bigger version of all of this? It’s going to be statements, shouting, evidence presented (that will be ignored).
Even if Pence does whatever magical thing people say he’s going to do, what’s to stop a majority legislature from ignoring it, if there’s no judiciary to enforce it?
There is no “primary them,” or “vote them out,” or “we need a new party.”
This is it. If this doesn’t get fixed, it’s all over. I don’t see the numbers in our legislature to do this. And without any functional judiciary, nothing happens to the bad actors.
Any talk post election will be pointless because the Democrats and Republican conspirators will control everything.
There exists a fatal flaw in our election process that has been exploited to the advantage of one party.
In short, it is not possible to bring any satisfactory legal challenge to contest an election. Either you don't have standing or it is too late Or the ultimate insult, "it does not matter because each individual complaint as a standalone is insufficient to change the election.
No, he's saying that they made a report in which they stated the vote was stolen, that absentee ballots should be audited, and that their report further recommended decertification of Biden's win in GA.
It was not a committee report. It was a report made by the chairman alone.
This Report by the Subcommittee Chair has not been formally approved by the Subcommittee or the standing Judiciary Committee.It is submitted for informational purposes to be a part of the record at the request of the Judiciary Chair.It is a summary of testimony given in person and by affidavit.For more information, please refer to the video record of the hearing and the affidavits submitted.
Anyone who can't make it to DC needs to at least try to make it to Atlanta, or whatever capitol you live near, instead. Make the whole thing unignorable.
I grew up in New Jersey, 15 minutes out of NYC, by Giants Stadium. The city before and after Rudy was completely different. You felt safe again, businesses thrived. The crime rate was reduced so much it brought down the entire nations crime rate. Great man, great mayor.
AND CORN POP WAS A BAD DUDE, AND HE RAN A BUNCH OF BAD BOYS. AND BACK IN THOSE DAYS, TO SHOW HOW THINGS HAVE CHANGED, ONE OF THE THINGS YOU HAD TO USE, IF YOU USED POMADE IN YOUR HAIR, YOU HAD TO WEAR A BABY CAP.
I don't see why he would lie about it
That's what I look for. The more they scream coup about Trump, the more worried they are. When we see their goons hit the streets, they're starting to panic. Jan 6th will b wild
Can't wait until we flush these goons out into the streets.
It'll be satisfying to have them meet us all in once place. Save us the trouble of having to knock down their doors.
It will be the first time any of those arrogant commie thugs paid by Soros face actual consequences for their assholery. It will be hysterically catastrophic for them.
If nobody else will deal with them, we'll have to.
They'll regret not letting an honest court incarcerate their worthless asses for life.
Honest court...thatd be something wouldn't it?
Will it though? Are conservatives willing to do what needs to be done in significant numbers?
The sheer mechanics of murdering millions in one day places your concern out of the scope of reality. Calm the doomer sentiment please.
If we have real gangsta ass pedes in DC, they'll practice a choreographed Broadway musical "gangs meeting in the streets" scene and have a PA to pump some funny music. Pantifas shows up and they spontaneously burst into perfectly synchronized song and dance. Be there, it will be wild!
Are you going?
Sadly I can't. But I took leave for the day of because I don't think I'll be capable of forming a single productive thought that day. You?
Like the Beat It video?
Nailed it.
Cobras vs. Panthers
Can I join....I'm ANGRY
https://thedonald.win/p/11RO7V5O1p/no-one-knows-what-will-happen-ja/c/
Olbermann is there. Only thing left is for his head to spin 360
They never thought retribution would come.
Jan 7th mass pardoning of patriots?
Did they vote for that? I didn’t know they voted to decertify.
Exactly. The committee is likely less than 10 people and holds no real power.
No. He says the vote was bipartisan. All the Demonrats on the Commitee voted to decertify.
But Rudy does not say how many Demonrats were on the Commitee.
No he was intentionally vague and obtuse, a key mark of a huckster, by the way. Republicans on the Judiciary committee released a report suggesting their was possibly enough evidence to decertify the vote and it should be taken up by a special session of the GA legislature.
It’s good. It’s progress, but we are down 28-3 in the middle of the 3rd quarter and Rudy’s tweet makes it sound like we just tied the game up.
I’m honestly sick of his self-serving ass saying whatever he thinks will keep him in favor of President Trump. GEOTUS is trusting him and he is crashing and burning in real time, but because the President is busy running a country and can’t be everywhere all the time, he’s not Able to over see every move Rudy is making.
Rudy is as bad as Powell and Lin Wood these days.
And therefore the press isn't free.
It’s kind of like the saying “it’s not happening until people are in handcuffs” whenever somebody cries happening and posts a screencap of a tweet or something. That’s what we’ve gotten so used to this past four years.
We don’t count our chickens before they’ve hatched anymore.
Nothing ever happens. It's like our entire side is just one big show where they all pretend to be doing something and it never happens..
Well, that is indeed what the RINO GOP specializes in in DC.
They love being out of power. They get to say all sorts of meaningful-sounding stuff without ever actually doing anything. And... take in all of that seeet, sweet influence-peddling money, of course.
Oh my God. The GOP is DNC/Globalists bitch, and willingly, methinks.
This cannot be allowed to continue.
This is hard to read but also hard to disagree with
It happens on video at the end of the Georgia hearing
It's Giuliani, he's not gonna publicly tweet something that would be easy to prove untrue and discredit him with.
Yes he's solid.
They are trying to take his license already.
A wreckless untrue post would be good grounds
Ummmm... he just did... Republicans on a committee released a report that suggests a special session should be called to decertify. He’s buried it in a sub point so he can lawyer his way out of it being a direct lie, but in plain English, he is obscuring the truth about what happened. You can tell by how many people here are confused about the meaning of what he is saying.
Do you not know Rudy’s reputation? It’s solid and you have no reason to doubt him . Are you trolling?
What I find is that when I am more truthful myself, it's easier for me to spot untruthful people. They stand out like a sore thumb.
Anyway I don't really see too many "true believers" on this site, just people who love their country. Right? What brings you to this site? Is there anything that you love? Honest questions.
You didn’t ask me but anyone who loves this country should be as pissed as I am that Rudy is now obfuscating the truth to loyal supporters. No one voted to decertify, and his lawyerly way of dropping it in a separate bullet point is infuriating. A few Senate Republicans on one committee released a report recommending a special session be called to look at decertifying the vote.
It’s bullshit. Rudy knows it. He’s hoping to string people along with more false hope, but I’m sick of it. If Rudy isn’t telling us the truth plainly than who can we rely on?
Anyone who is saying anything other than; “it looks bad, but put our energy into showing up on the 6th because massive public support for stopping the steal is our last best hope.” Is not telling the truth.
Anyone who thinks Pence is going to use some clever procedural tricks is ignoring the last 7 weeks of history. The uniparty/Dems have the entire process and the courts locked up. This is about public opinion only at this point. Until they realize that Biden does not and will not have the consent of the governed, nothing will change.
No, I'm not joking. Why give your enemies ammunition by telling lies that can be debunked by public record? That makes no sense, he'd be caught in like an hour.
Because he's a leftist troll who doesn't know anything
Too bad the mods here love these leftist trolls.
The Lincoln project trolls do it on consignment on behalf of their Dimocrat overlords.
Even atheist like me turn to God! WHEN HES REAL! HE WILL MAKE SURE TRUMPS SECOND TERM COMES! Through all of you faithfull pedes, i cant believe i type this, but BLESS YOU ALL!
We have free will, some choose that to do evil, but He respects our free will.
I'm agnostic and have no problems with God but is it really free will if you're allowed to do what you want but you'll burn in hell for eternity if you do? Isn't that manipulation?
It's a very good question, one of the difficult topics about the Christian faith.
There are many thoughts out there but I can give you my perspective for what it's worth. My understanding of God is that He created the world and sustains it. Every good thing we experience ultimately comes from Him. But He was not interested in a creation that would just do everything He wanted, He gave us a choice. We first chose to sin, and this separated us from Him. He is absolutely Holy and cannot tolerate sin or evil. So He sent His Son to die as an intermediary, that if we accept Him we are then justified before Him once more.
That's the groundwork. So if we don't accept Him on this earth, when we truly have a choice (won't be much of a choice when we are standing before Him in heaven), then we will be eternally separated. That eternal separation is Hell, and it's so terrible because we are completely separated from kindness and goodness and love. All that is left is despair and hatred and bitterness. I don't know how literal the flames are, but it's absolutely a horrible place regardless because it lacks Him.
I spent many years in medical school and during training doubting my faith. I just recently came back, after reading about the Shroud of Turin of all things on conservapedia lol. I did some of my own research and I am convinced.
Whom the Lord loves He chastens
Plenty of Christian North Korean defectors and underground Christians in North Korea. Suffering of varying degrees is universal in this world. The point is that it doesn't have to be permanent if you use the fruits of it as a grace toward your salvation.
You can't have the ups without the downs. We're going to come out of this with another Trump term,widespread corruption exposed and dealt with, and more people than ever with more pride for their country than ever. God always has a plan.
Yeah man , bad things happening debunks God. You did it, you solved it
Your relationship with your god makes you sound a like a simp. "My wife/god isn't cheating on me/letting satan win, we're just in an open relationship/have free will!'
We’re you not entertained?
That’s such a low IQ way of thinking that’s how things work
No; mankind (actually WOMEN) fucked it all up for us back in the garden of Eden.
We were given a literal paradise and all we had to do was not touch ONE FUCKING TREE, but bitch couldn't keep her damn mouth shut.
Had to go & listen to a freakin' snek of all things.
Satan didn't even disguise himself as a puppy or a kitten; a freakin' SNAKE made woman throw away paradise.
Our punishment for not heeding God's instructions at the Garden of Eden is that we were sentenced to a hard, rough life, filled with work, toil, pain and misery.
Lots of joy to be sure, but lots of pain & hassle too.
Oh look, another woman hating democrap.
I apologize if my post offended, as that was not my intent.
I'm simply stating the biblical and historical truth that woman accepted the fruit of the forbidden tree and caused she and Adam to be cast out of the Garden of Eden and condemned to a lifetime of toil, pain, and suffering as punishment for disobeying God.
Men sure as fuck ain't perfect...not by a long shot. :-)
Exactly, LOL.
3 isnt true. I dont know why he is saying that.
Technically true I think... the Judiciary committee voted to decertify, but the entire legislature has to vote as well before its actually decertified.
Does GA legislature have a Trump friendly majority?
yea #3 is the one I am a bit confused by
I think he is implying it SHOULD be de certified in a special legislative election
It was unavailable. Wondering if twitter is active in censoring/deleting/banning him again.
Perhaps twitter has it so a certain number of impressions can't see it.
my effort to fight censorship:
giulianis twitter-
"In a country with a free press, you would know:
The Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee issued a report demonstrating the vote was stolen from @realDonaldTrump .
The vote was unanimous and BIPARTISAN to audit Fulton County’s Absentee ballots.
And to de-certify Biden."
Section 230 MUST be repealed
BRB using Dominion to give you 230 upvotes
No, we want to reform 230 to where it is actually enforced. If we scrap 230 it will be the end of all platforms including this one. Same with Parler and other alt-tech sites.
Big tech and MSM would benefit greatly from 230 repeal. This site would be inundated with defamation lawsuits regardless how baseless they may be.
They wouldn't benefit at all, they'd be swamped with lawsuits of their own x 10,000.
It would be the biggest windfall in the history of the human race - for the lawyers.
The courts? They'd be clogged and shut down by the volume of suits.
It's an untenable solution, unless they replace 230 at the same time with something more fair. Or just revise/reform it.
You have to understand how many crazies out there drooling at the idea of suing everyone, because the voices in their pickle jar told them to.
yeah but everyone would get $25 in class action suits
Youtube would just purge non verified or non mainstream channels. It’s the perfect excuse to remove the rabble rousing progressive and maga factions. They would only allow sanitized corporate propaganda.
230 doesn't cover only political speech. Removing 230 means every drama channel can sue YouTube because someone said something catty about them. Half of YouTube is drama channels.
230 isn't about content, directly. **It's protection from being sued over content. ** With no 230 protections, YouTube can be sued for every single video on their system, and every single comment.
This holds true for every forum, every image site, everything. If third parties can post to it, they're liable for everything on it. Imagine what happens to gossip sites like TMZ. It's an untenable solution because it shuts down all discussion on the internet. I read a discussion that removing 230 could potentially allow people to sue Yelp, for bad reviews of their company.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230
Revise/reform, not repeal. Only repeal if they have something new to take it's place immediately.
But we don't care about the drama channels, and TMZ still broadcasts on platforms outside of YouTube. I'm not saying keep 230 with it's current interpretation, but some form of 230 is absolutely necessary. Trump ordering the FCC to redefine their interpretation of 230 would do a ton of good. I'm not disagreeing with what you say but rather adding some additional considerations to your analysis.
You don't have to care about drama channels, it's just an example of how far removing 230 spreads. I'm glad you agree, and see it.
Who cares though? If they shut down thedonald.win we can have thedonald.somethingelse the next day. If they shut down Twitter Facebook or Google they're fucked.
It will only be repealed for large sites. Or telecommunications act which forces equal protection for all users
So it is tru that if 230 is repealed big tech will be liable for all commentary?
Telecommunications Act of 1996 too. Paved the way for Corporate Domination of the media.
Isn’t that the same bill that said “digital signatures count the same as handwritten ones?”
That could be a problematic repeal.
What do you think about the idea that if 230 is repealed big tech will just kick off all political commentary? Is it true that if 230 is repealed big tech will become liable for all commentary?
230 doesn't just cover political speech. It covers all speech. It going away can mean I can sue TheDonald because you said something negative about me. And have standing.
That seems to be a poison pill for free speech
That’s how I’ve view it. I absolutely agree it needs to be reformed
Rudy. As a jamaican trump supporter. Don't let these focking democrats get away with this. Yuh hear me.
Yardie all up in here :)
My father named me after the OG legend
Hah the username of the guy that CNN threatened and doxxed.
Based.
Soon come.
Yeah mon! As a Venezuelan Trump supporter, the WORLD depends on Trump and his administration to fulfill the destiny that God has set up for them.
Conceding will mean living the rest of our lives in the shadows. (Look at communist Cuba 60 years in the dark. And Venezuela heading there soon, hopefully turned around)
What part of Jamaica you from?
Kingston originally but man. I all over the place because of business.
Bless up man, this fuckery gone end, mark our words. Looking forward to visiting Jamaica again soon, y'all good ppl
Do you have a little healing bot that follows you around by chance?
yeah. it is called weed
I was referencing a video game Apex Legends there is a Jamaican character
Nah man. I don't really play video games.
Well they can't even hold session. The smartest part of the treasonou plan was to compromise just a handful of governors & Sec of States so they could run out the clock on Republican legislatures because governors are blocking them from holding session.
Exactly, show up, hold session. What's the governor going to do?
Do judges need the permission of the governor to hear a case?
Seperation of powers. Don't ask permission.
Actually they can, but it requires a majority of them not only to have the balls to convene independently, but the brains to understand that the Federal Constitution gives them that power. As it happens, either one of balls and brains are in short supply in any legislature, and finding someone with both is miraculous.
I wondered about this, but it is not to hard in this day and age to make an email list of Republicans and send, "Hey man, wanna meet up and vote?" They are not stupid and it will happen is the only logical scenario that will happen.
They're playing people with this "we can't meet becuz Governor hurrr." They're hoping people are stupid enough to buy it. They don't really want to do anything.
The silver lining is support for Pence and/or Congress to not accept the Biden Slate with the black cloud so clearly on the GA election. NOT POSSIBLE TO ACCEPT.
Xiden.. thats a new nickname for him that I have heard...kek.
Made me LOL
In a country with a free press, we would also know that our entire country is controlled by the deep state and corporations, and our government is not a direct reflection of the people's will.
Enough of us know. At bare minimum, tens of millions. In the American Revolution, it was not the case that all Americans were on board. A lot backed the King, many were busy (muh work muh family). Ever seen The Patriot? Mel Gibson's character requires one of his children being shot and killed point blank in front of his face before he moves his ass to help. All that is to say... Most humans are followers. There are more than enough Americans who see the truth that could gather and lead those unengaged, indifferent, and maybe even brainwashed. None of this is easy, or safe, it just requires some initial courage and organization. We seem to have the perfect vehicle here...
Because when massive corporations like twitler and facebook are essentially the 'public square' and benefit from the protections of section 230, but then act like a publisher and blatently censor political speech, meddle in elections, and 'fact check' with Soros owned companies to push their bias and lies, that becomes a problem for freedom in general.
We are making something better, and it involves removing those protections for those types of entities. If they want to abuse their power and behave like a tyrant and a publisher, then they can get sued out of existence.
Ugh. Head in sand!
Yeah you’re free to start a paper; just compete with these billionaires!
The next step is to go full socialist, like we do here in Canada: Yeah you’re free to start a paper; just compete with us funding our own paper with your tax dollars!
Shortly later the China model: Yeah you’re free to start a paper; just don’t be surprised if you get organ harvested in a totally unrelated incident!
There is clearly broad collusion between major media outlets to misrepresent, suppress and censor legitimate legal and political information. Combine this with de-platforming of alternate media and it's clear to any thinking person that a free and independent press barely exists in the current environment.
If you don't think the media and the Democrat party are colluding together on what the daily narrative/censorship is, I've got some swamp land to sell you.
It is illegal.
They are all owned by the same entities and should have their broadcast licenses pulled.
When Google bans entire news agencies from youtube, and google censors basic web search results unless they are aligned with their political view, and twitter bans newspapers for publishing factual data that they don't agree with, that is NOT freedom of the press.
"in a country with free press"
twitter then blocks people from seeing his tweet. How'd they do that without taking the post down, couldn't see it unless I went to some link a pede posted
Keep fighting, Rudy. An army awaits
1/6/21
I'll be there.
It will be wild.
Wait am I reading this correctly. In addition to voting to audit the physical ballots in Fulton County they voted to decertify Biden? Does that mean GA is done or does the GA House also need to vote before its final?
It means a committee voted. The GA legislature had not voted on the committee’s recommendation.
Ahhh I see.
No wasnt poopooing. Sorry it's was an "ahhhh" of realization..... Perhaps more of an ohhhhh?
They voted/agreed to recommend in their report that Biden should be decertified.
Still a committee. The legislature can't meet unless Kemp calls them into session, which it ain't gonna happen.
The legislature can meet on their own under the Federal constitution. It remains to be seen whether they will.
They can do it with as little as a petition, such as in AZ.
Incredible news. Good thing I sub to theDonald.win
I agree with Giuliani 100%. The problem is this is all talk and no action.
More evidence keeps spilling out. Nothing happens.
More meetings with state election boards and legislatures. Nothing happens.
Do people realize that unless there is some form of kinetic action, that Jan 6 is going to be a bigger version of all of this? It’s going to be statements, shouting, evidence presented (that will be ignored).
Even if Pence does whatever magical thing people say he’s going to do, what’s to stop a majority legislature from ignoring it, if there’s no judiciary to enforce it?
There is no “primary them,” or “vote them out,” or “we need a new party.”
This is it. If this doesn’t get fixed, it’s all over. I don’t see the numbers in our legislature to do this. And without any functional judiciary, nothing happens to the bad actors.
Any talk post election will be pointless because the Democrats and Republican conspirators will control everything.
There exists a fatal flaw in our election process that has been exploited to the advantage of one party.
In short, it is not possible to bring any satisfactory legal challenge to contest an election. Either you don't have standing or it is too late Or the ultimate insult, "it does not matter because each individual complaint as a standalone is insufficient to change the election.
Right, I think whatever happens (if anything) will NOT be anything that was expected.
This is exactly what the 2nd Amendment is for. Force them to do the proper constitutional thing or pay the price. No arguing with a bullet.
My dream come true, they're gonna audit Fulton.
https://thedonald.win/p/11ROGrIrH0/an-ode-to-a-warrior-within-our-r/c/
And then Ric Flair goes:
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
I am amazed by his doctrine
i think all tweets need to be screenshots at this point.
Tell me after something happens, not before. Only action matters, not promises of action.
They did not vote to de-certify. What he is saying is that because of 1 and 2, 3 must follow.
Then show us proof they de-certified
No, he's saying that they made a report in which they stated the vote was stolen, that absentee ballots should be audited, and that their report further recommended decertification of Biden's win in GA.
Where's the report?
http://www.senatorligon.com/THE_FINAL%20REPORT.PDF
It was not a committee report. It was a report made by the chairman alone.
The media is part of the electoral coup. Don't expect journalism from them.
BOOM!!! This is what winning looks like!!! KEEP CALLING SENATORS, CONGRESS EVERYONE THAT MATTERS FOR ALL STATES! GET MCCONNELLS MIND RIGHT!!?!
Doesn't mean shit when the courts don't approve any of it..
How difficult has been this road. Steve Bannon and Rudy said, "if one falls, they all fall." As always, I remain hope filled, and faith filled.
Anyone who can't make it to DC needs to at least try to make it to Atlanta, or whatever capitol you live near, instead. Make the whole thing unignorable.
Is it bad that I read this as ruby ridgeing the spice. Probably says things about where my head is at
I grew up in New Jersey, 15 minutes out of NYC, by Giants Stadium. The city before and after Rudy was completely different. You felt safe again, businesses thrived. The crime rate was reduced so much it brought down the entire nations crime rate. Great man, great mayor.
Didn’t the Data Scientists say that after adjudicating the ballot the original is destroyed? Near the end of their testimony... https://rumble.com/vcay7j-data-scientists-shocking-election-testimony.html
https://mobile.twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1345099883603140608
“The original scan ceases to exist” doesn’t mean shredding...it could just mean it is permanently changed
Okiedokie. Thanks, pede.
I live in Georgia and haven't even heard this. Local news is all like muh Ossoff, muh Warnock.
I am getting sick of seeing their ads everywhere I go.
Really hoping these state legislatures were waiting to pull out all the stops to do it at the last minute so Biden can't react in time.
Look fat here’s the deal. This guy is a pedophile. Come on man!
I don't believe it.
How many Demonrats on Commitee voted to decertify Georgia????
Please advise.
The testimony they got from a few very compelling witnesses & experts caused this to happen. It was overwhelming
The dominos are wobbling bigly.
Did ga vote in fact get decertified?
Let's see the report. Send it to the governor ASAP
How bout the sauce? He can't forget the sauce or else we'll have nothing to eat on the 6th
To be clear, he is saying they voted to de-certify Biden? What the fuck does this mean? Does the Judiciary COMMITTEE have the power to de-certify?
Trump won. Now he just has to take it.
The majority of American is behind him.
Man, I like to think I keep up with this stuff and I didn’t know any of this
we have a corporate press
No tag from Twatter?
Rusy and GEOTUS need to get on Parler.
AND CORN POP WAS A BAD DUDE, AND HE RAN A BUNCH OF BAD BOYS. AND BACK IN THOSE DAYS, TO SHOW HOW THINGS HAVE CHANGED, ONE OF THE THINGS YOU HAD TO USE, IF YOU USED POMADE IN YOUR HAIR, YOU HAD TO WEAR A BABY CAP.
We will owe Guiliani so much when this is over.