Hi TDW!
I'm Dave Lobue, and you might have watched our testimony from DIG (Data Integrity Group) at the Georgia Senate hearing yesterday: https://rumble.com/vcay7j-data-scientists-shocking-election-testimony.html
Here's where you can find a list of our videos:
https://rumble.com/user/ElectionNightFacts
I've got 12 years experience in data science and analytics. I have a BA in Philosophy, Masters in Business/Marketing from Grenoble Ecole de Management in France, and currently I'm pursuing a Masters in Data Science from Northwestern University specializing in Artificial Intelligence.
I'd love to talk to you about our findings, answer your questions as to our data and methodologies, and maybe even talk a little bit about the voting systems. Mostly other members of the team handle the systems side, so my primary focus is on the data and the story that the data tells.
I'll echo something that another team member (Justin Mealey) posted in his AMA: please forget what you've heard about the poll pads. It's sending people down the wrong paths of analysis, and what Jovan said about the poll pads and hacking into them is not correct.
So true. I showed to my husband the video of scanning the same ballots three times in secrecy. One can not get better evidence than that. He said well maybe the ballots are supposed to be scanned multiple times. And surely the computer will catch the duplicates.
He must be really handsome to make up for being dumb as a box of rocks.
Well the funny thing is that he under normal circumstance had been recognized as a very intelligent person. He was recruited into John Hopkin gifted program when he was young, and IQ tested at 183 by the program.(Each IQ test has its own ceiling score, so do not confuse this number with Einstein's 160. I believe the program then has much higher ceiling score than now) Skipped entire high school, got three degrees in computer science, math and physics in three years, and later on got MS and phD in computer science. I have never seen him working so hard to explain away things as he did in regarding hunter biden laptop thing and this election. The scary thing is that he is not alone. All our friends are like him, quite intelligent and good at their technical field, a few of them are quite famous scientists. But yet they all suffer TDS syndrome. In their view, Trump is bad, as bad as could be, therefore anything remotely associated with Trump is also bad. If one ask them the evidences of badness of Trump, well, it all goes down to the way how Trump speaks. I do not like many of Trump's speaks and twitter msgs as well, but his policies are way better than the past few presidents and I also understand Trump speaks in a way more exaggerated. I understand this tendency, so it did not bother me. But for a technical person likes my husband, it apparently is the biggest sin. Many technical person has some of autistic traits. One of the obvious weakness is they tend to interpret things literally, very literally. That is how you got the left running away with Trump's comment about bleach.