Hi TDW!
I'm Dave Lobue, and you might have watched our testimony from DIG (Data Integrity Group) at the Georgia Senate hearing yesterday: https://rumble.com/vcay7j-data-scientists-shocking-election-testimony.html
Here's where you can find a list of our videos:
https://rumble.com/user/ElectionNightFacts
I've got 12 years experience in data science and analytics. I have a BA in Philosophy, Masters in Business/Marketing from Grenoble Ecole de Management in France, and currently I'm pursuing a Masters in Data Science from Northwestern University specializing in Artificial Intelligence.
I'd love to talk to you about our findings, answer your questions as to our data and methodologies, and maybe even talk a little bit about the voting systems. Mostly other members of the team handle the systems side, so my primary focus is on the data and the story that the data tells.
I'll echo something that another team member (Justin Mealey) posted in his AMA: please forget what you've heard about the poll pads. It's sending people down the wrong paths of analysis, and what Jovan said about the poll pads and hacking into them is not correct.
Thank you for mentioning this. People have gotten very caught up with what Jovan said and it doesn't seem like the right angle to me. Your testimony was very compelling and I don't see how any reasonable person wouldn't want to investigate.
It sounded more like dominion, Hacking, etc. There might be truth in it, but it requires further investigation in the future.
All I'm saying is, this group has solidified the question we all had in our minds with day 1 of the election. Why were vote switches happening on live TV? Either it was direct human error (requires investigation for fraud) or it was programmed switching (also requires investigation for fraud). The data itself being transmitted was erroneous, you cannot possibly take away votes from a candidate... This happened to both candidates multiple times. The "accidental" direct switches from one candidate to another are weird too.
Absolutely no one has attempted to answer this fundamental question. This should be our primary focus. Prove to me that the 13K vote switch in Georgia was some kind of legit clerical error, along with every single other one of them in all the other states. No one has.
Who cares what the data says on TV if the data is crap. I just read a "Reuters fact check" on live vote switching on TV. Their explanation? Well Chris Krebs said it was secure, so it must be. Oh yeah, and they poke holes that it was a clip from 2019 not 2020 (irrelevant and once again ignores the fact that fraud likely existed then [thus is likely to exist now also], and the exact same type of vote switches are seen in a ton of states in the presidential race).
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cnn-not-evidence-vote-fraud/fact-check-tv-news-clip-does-not-show-live-computerized-fraud-on-election-day-2020-idUSKBN27P2TI
Haha you’re right. I read the whole article you linked. Weak arguments throughout. Almost every “debunk” was devoid of explanation... just a few humans quoted as saying, “that’s not true.”