If you think it's fine to inject an experimental vaccine that has already caused death and serious side effects, is only temporarily effective if it works at all, and comes with a "freeze your sperm" before consenting warning, more power to you.
Medications have side effects. If you give Ibuprofen to 3 million people, one's going to die from it, and several are going to develop allergic reactions. If you give dairy to 3 million people, one's going to die from it. Others are going to die from random unrelated causes because people die everyday from something. If you see 3 million people take a medication, and five people develop Bell's Palsy, then that medication is a massive fucking success. (BTW Bells Palsy is something that develops in healthy people with no history of medications or vaccines too. So if you're going to vaccinate 3 million people, one WILL develop it, regardless of whether they get placebo or vaccine or nothing.)
Vaccines save lives. If you've ever been bitten by a rabid animal and taken a rabies shot, then you know they work.
Here in Oxford we've had the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency breathing down our necks the entire fucking time. The experiments are over. This is a success not an experiment. And if you still think this is some random experimental shit, then you're disrespecting the hard work of pedes here who have given their fucking life, blood, sweat, tears and sleepless nights to make this so we can fight back against the shit pathogens that come from China. AND that of thousands of volunteers who have provided us with data which proves that it is safe/90%+ effective.
A) It doesn't edit DNA, as DNA and MRNA are widely different things.
B) It is extremely fragile and lasts about 48 hours.
C) It is fast. MRNA is a platform that can produce vaccines within a week.
D) Bells Palsy occurs in the population even without ANY medications or vaccines. If you vaccinate 3 million people, several will get Bells Palsy who would have gotten it anyway.
Now imagine China sends us SARS. I'm talking about original SARS, with its 40% death rate, but in a more infectious form.
Do we or do we not want a successful MRNA platform to produce vaccines within a week?
I know it's scary. New is scary, antibiotics were once scary. Xray machines. CRISPR. Even Ivermectin when it first came out. But we push through the scary, we test and we progress.
We measure vaccine efficacy by comparing the frequency of COVID-19 illness in the vaccinated and the unvaccinated (placebo) groups. We look at three things:
a) how well does it prevent infection (how many people are infected, compared to the placebo group)
b) how serious is the disease compared to unvaccinated individuals (can we prevent hospital admissions, even in elderly and high risk people? If ALL or most people can have a mild cold and not need hospitalization or get to the stage where blood clotting becomes an issue, that is also considered a success.)
c) transmission - do vaccinated individuals transmit the illness to fewer people than unvaccinated individuals
It is based on these three criteria that the numbers were calculated, when the doses were given at a specific interval. If you're interested in the exact numbers, look up the study "Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine".
In terms of safety, there were 24,000 (23,848 if you want to be specific) participants enrolled, out of which roughly half were in the primary efficacy analysis. After 74,341 person-months of safety follow-up, there were 84 adverse events in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group (this is the total number of adverse events, not necessarily vaccine-related, but ANYTHING odd health-wise that happens to the individuals monitored - for example, getting food poisoning from eating expired shellfish is considered one, and is noted down even if it has nothing to do with the vaccine. If you stub your toenail and it becomes infected, it's written down. And so on, because it's looked at from all angles.). These adverse effects are then analysed, and one event was directly related to the vaccine in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group. The adverse event that paused the vaccine momentarily, but which may not have been caused by the vaccine, was in a person with Multiple Sclerosis (this was transverse myelitis). However, a person in the placebo group also developed transverse myelitis (no vaccine, nothing) and when you are dealing with a very large number of testers, health events occur, especially in people with chronic neurological illnesses like MS. Overall, the numbers were extremely reassuring. (just a side note this is not the mrna vaccine, this is the regular one)
I agree to a point, but only to a point. Sure I'm glad I don't have polio or lockjaw or diptheria, etc.
However, I'm not a big fan of Eugenicists and for some reason they have taken a very big interest in vaccines. I'm not a big fan of anyone who feels entitled to do the things they do.
As long as it's not mandatory I don't care what others do with their bodies. You try to force me to take a vaccine...Someone is going to die.
It did not come with a warning..... A completely separate group is doing a study on fertility rates with the vaccine, like is done with every vaccine.... And while the lead scientists said "they have no reason to believe it has any effect on fertility rates", they still told the participants that they "may want to freeze their sperm before getting the vaccine"....
That's literally the ONLY place the quote came from.... A study being performed by a completely separate group apart from the drug companies who said they currently have no reason to believe it hurts fertility.......
Just FYI this is often a requirement or a question asked when you participate in medicine trials. It's insurance and doesn't mean that will be a side effect.
If you think it's fine to inject an experimental vaccine that has already caused death and serious side effects, is only temporarily effective if it works at all, and comes with a "freeze your sperm" before consenting warning, more power to you.
Medications have side effects. If you give Ibuprofen to 3 million people, one's going to die from it, and several are going to develop allergic reactions. If you give dairy to 3 million people, one's going to die from it. Others are going to die from random unrelated causes because people die everyday from something. If you see 3 million people take a medication, and five people develop Bell's Palsy, then that medication is a massive fucking success. (BTW Bells Palsy is something that develops in healthy people with no history of medications or vaccines too. So if you're going to vaccinate 3 million people, one WILL develop it, regardless of whether they get placebo or vaccine or nothing.)
Vaccines save lives. If you've ever been bitten by a rabid animal and taken a rabies shot, then you know they work.
Here in Oxford we've had the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency breathing down our necks the entire fucking time. The experiments are over. This is a success not an experiment. And if you still think this is some random experimental shit, then you're disrespecting the hard work of pedes here who have given their fucking life, blood, sweat, tears and sleepless nights to make this so we can fight back against the shit pathogens that come from China. AND that of thousands of volunteers who have provided us with data which proves that it is safe/90%+ effective.
But here is the crux.
A) It doesn't edit DNA, as DNA and MRNA are widely different things. B) It is extremely fragile and lasts about 48 hours. C) It is fast. MRNA is a platform that can produce vaccines within a week. D) Bells Palsy occurs in the population even without ANY medications or vaccines. If you vaccinate 3 million people, several will get Bells Palsy who would have gotten it anyway.
Now imagine China sends us SARS. I'm talking about original SARS, with its 40% death rate, but in a more infectious form.
Do we or do we not want a successful MRNA platform to produce vaccines within a week?
I know it's scary. New is scary, antibiotics were once scary. Xray machines. CRISPR. Even Ivermectin when it first came out. But we push through the scary, we test and we progress.
can I have some sources? any links you have regarding the vaccine, cuz google is all "its safe dont worry"
How do you know it's 90%+ effective?
We measure vaccine efficacy by comparing the frequency of COVID-19 illness in the vaccinated and the unvaccinated (placebo) groups. We look at three things:
a) how well does it prevent infection (how many people are infected, compared to the placebo group)
b) how serious is the disease compared to unvaccinated individuals (can we prevent hospital admissions, even in elderly and high risk people? If ALL or most people can have a mild cold and not need hospitalization or get to the stage where blood clotting becomes an issue, that is also considered a success.)
c) transmission - do vaccinated individuals transmit the illness to fewer people than unvaccinated individuals
It is based on these three criteria that the numbers were calculated, when the doses were given at a specific interval. If you're interested in the exact numbers, look up the study "Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine".
In terms of safety, there were 24,000 (23,848 if you want to be specific) participants enrolled, out of which roughly half were in the primary efficacy analysis. After 74,341 person-months of safety follow-up, there were 84 adverse events in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group (this is the total number of adverse events, not necessarily vaccine-related, but ANYTHING odd health-wise that happens to the individuals monitored - for example, getting food poisoning from eating expired shellfish is considered one, and is noted down even if it has nothing to do with the vaccine. If you stub your toenail and it becomes infected, it's written down. And so on, because it's looked at from all angles.). These adverse effects are then analysed, and one event was directly related to the vaccine in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group. The adverse event that paused the vaccine momentarily, but which may not have been caused by the vaccine, was in a person with Multiple Sclerosis (this was transverse myelitis). However, a person in the placebo group also developed transverse myelitis (no vaccine, nothing) and when you are dealing with a very large number of testers, health events occur, especially in people with chronic neurological illnesses like MS. Overall, the numbers were extremely reassuring. (just a side note this is not the mrna vaccine, this is the regular one)
That study included 1077 participants and says nothing about A, B, or C
I agree to a point, but only to a point. Sure I'm glad I don't have polio or lockjaw or diptheria, etc.
However, I'm not a big fan of Eugenicists and for some reason they have taken a very big interest in vaccines. I'm not a big fan of anyone who feels entitled to do the things they do.
As long as it's not mandatory I don't care what others do with their bodies. You try to force me to take a vaccine...Someone is going to die.
We're not tame here.
It did not come with a warning..... A completely separate group is doing a study on fertility rates with the vaccine, like is done with every vaccine.... And while the lead scientists said "they have no reason to believe it has any effect on fertility rates", they still told the participants that they "may want to freeze their sperm before getting the vaccine"....
That's literally the ONLY place the quote came from.... A study being performed by a completely separate group apart from the drug companies who said they currently have no reason to believe it hurts fertility.......
Just FYI this is often a requirement or a question asked when you participate in medicine trials. It's insurance and doesn't mean that will be a side effect.