I thought his point was that ballots in R areas were deliberately misprinted to not calibrate right and therefore require adjudication. What am I missing?
Not necessarily, it could be that large batches of all ballots in all districts were misprinted intentionally to cause mass adjudication, and they would only change the rep ones as necessary. Doesnt disprove his point at all, just might require modification of scope and scale
No. His point was predicated upon the idea that REPUBLICAN precincts were seeing more mis-registered ballots. Then he used a DEMOCRAT precinct as an example of a REPUBLICAN heavy area...
that was because he got the two Buckheads confused.
Congratulations, you entirely missed his point.
I thought his point was that ballots in R areas were deliberately misprinted to not calibrate right and therefore require adjudication. What am I missing?
Not necessarily, it could be that large batches of all ballots in all districts were misprinted intentionally to cause mass adjudication, and they would only change the rep ones as necessary. Doesnt disprove his point at all, just might require modification of scope and scale
No. His point was predicated upon the idea that REPUBLICAN precincts were seeing more mis-registered ballots. Then he used a DEMOCRAT precinct as an example of a REPUBLICAN heavy area...
that was because he got the two Buckheads confused.