I thought his point was that ballots in R areas were deliberately misprinted to not calibrate right and therefore require adjudication. What am I missing?
Not necessarily, it could be that large batches of all ballots in all districts were misprinted intentionally to cause mass adjudication, and they would only change the rep ones as necessary. Doesnt disprove his point at all, just might require modification of scope and scale
I thought his point was that ballots in R areas were deliberately misprinted to not calibrate right and therefore require adjudication. What am I missing?
Not necessarily, it could be that large batches of all ballots in all districts were misprinted intentionally to cause mass adjudication, and they would only change the rep ones as necessary. Doesnt disprove his point at all, just might require modification of scope and scale