138
Comments (8)
sorted by:
6
kkuff 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm sure he has all kinds of cards up his sleeves that no one knows about. He didn't get to be a billionaire by giving away his plans/secrets. He's identified his enemies and is playing them like a chess game.

2
crazyjackel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump is strange, he seems to like strategies wherein it looks like he gets out of trouble by the skin of his teeth, but you see it happen enough times and you begin to think, yeah, no he is doing this on purpose.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
CyrusKingOfAnshan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the pence focus is so the rats go after his powers and he can make other moves

1
Msmcontrolsnarrative 1 point ago +1 / -0

He will publicly release all the evidence they have.

Pence will be forced to throw out electors.

1
Redmerc1999 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just a hunch, I could be completely wrong on this, but.... I think Pence will reject the votes from contested states as opposed to counting them for Trump (like they damn should be damn it, but that's another rant), resulting in neither Trump nor Pedo-Joe having the necessary 270. Why do I think this? Because Trump KNOWS what hangs in the balance. Trump wants justice, not bloodshed. He knows FULL WELL that people are just itching to pick a fight on his behalf, and he knows whether people trust him or hate him, he's their President either way, and he has an obligation to do what's best for them, even if it costs him.

I think he knows that moving it into a contested election, and forcing the states to vote (I'm vague on the details here, hopefully you get what I'm saying), will be the most non-violent way to get him officially sworn in for another 4 years.

If Pence were to accept only the Trump votes from the contested states, than it would give the "illegitimate President" card to all his enemies on a golden platter. But if all the states had to vote, with each state having only one vote, then it lets the election process play out to the maximum extent possible, and reduces all the blame being placed on one person (I like to call this "responsibility laundering").

Like I said... just a hunch, and I could be completely wrong, but I'm inclined to think that, although Jan 6 will be the beginning of something great, we may not have an "official" result for another couple weeks.