No legal maneuvering room? Obviously you have no idea what Thomas Jefferson did in 1800 as President of the Senate. You appear to also not know that follow on laws such as the voting act of 1887 do not supercede the Constituion.
LOL Pence can just do it as there is clearly established precedent. The Supreme Court can fuck off. Maybe learn something about Andrew Jackson's presidency.
PS Also look at what President of the Senate Nixon did in 1960 with Hawaii dual electors where he ignored the previously certified R Electors and Chose D electors for Kennedy
No legal maneuvering room? Obviously you have no idea what Thomas Jefferson did in 1800 as President of the Senate. You appear to also not know that follow on laws such as the voting act of 1887 do not supercede the Constituion.
So that requires scotus to support ditching the 1887 act. Odds?
Wrong
What your take? Pelosi and the Turtle invoke it and....?
LOL Pence can just do it as there is clearly established precedent. The Supreme Court can fuck off. Maybe learn something about Andrew Jackson's presidency.
And Jefferson, Lincoln and Rutherford B Hayes. Glad these guys are on our side but clearly were educated in government schools...
Correct
PS Also look at what President of the Senate Nixon did in 1960 with Hawaii dual electors where he ignored the previously certified R Electors and Chose D electors for Kennedy