894
posted ago by The_Him ago by The_Him +894 / -0

They won't announce it ahead of time but when the time comes more will stand as patriots. It won't be all and may not be half or even a quarter but Hawley will not stand alone. I'm sure of it.

Comments (46)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
16
Msmcontrolsnarrative 16 points ago +16 / -0

Cruz, Paul, Tuberville....?

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
7
deleted 7 points ago +10 / -3
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Junionthepipeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

He lost me at immigration

5
Maga0351 5 points ago +5 / -0

Paul, for the most part, sticks to his principles, but they’re not always aligned to a populist like Trump. He also puts out an annual Festivus spending report. He consistently votes against pork belly spending. He’s the only truly budget conscious senator we have. He’s worked with Trump on multiple items, and has even called out election fraud.

He and Cruz alone filibustered John Brennan’s nomination. Can I genuinely ask where the Paul hate is coming from? I get Graham, Grassley, and the rest of the RINOs, but what did Paul do?

The guy has survived multiple assaults for his stands, a train crash that was probably an assassination attempt, and was raised by IMO the best congressman to have ever served. He’s a medical doctor who Trump has funded to treat disaster victims in the Caribbean.

Not trying to cuck for Paul, just don’t see the issue with him. I’m 30, so not a boomer either.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

If Paul doesn't object I want him strung up with the rest of the traitors. I don't want to hear "MUH MUH MUH PRINCIPLES" when it comes to this shit.

4
alfredbester 4 points ago +4 / -0

Paul, a Kentucky Republican, rallied his party around the concerns he raised about domestic drone strikes during an almost 13-hour filibuster Thursday. In a less-than-50-word response Thursday to Paul’s request for clarification on administration policy, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. wrote to the senator to say “no,” President Barack Obama does not have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil.

Holder had sent a letter to Paul on March 4 that said there might be extraordinary circumstances, such as 9/11 or Pearl Harbor, where the government might have that authority. That response prompted Paul to hold an old-fashioned talking filibuster that went from 11:47 a.m. Wednesday to 12:39 a.m. Thursday.

While a number of Republicans rallied behind Paul, including Kentucky’s senior senator, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, it was John McCain and Lindsey Graham who broke with their party to oppose Paul’s stand against drone strikes on U.S. soil.

“I was going to vote against Brennan, until the filibuster,” Graham, of South Carolina, said Thursday. “I thought Brennan was arrogant, a bit shifty. I am going to vote for Brennan now because it’s become a referendum on the drone program.”

2
DroolingElmo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Y,y,y