322
Comments (11)
sorted by:
12
OGpsywar 12 points ago +12 / -0

Randy:
"(cough) It's all over, Kyle. (cough) Soon only 99.936% of us will remain.."

5
handpeople 5 points ago +6 / -1

Plenty of better statistics. This is a bad one however. I would not use this. Its a homeopathic redpill that doesnt work.

6
BadManOrange 6 points ago +6 / -0

There are ones that show further years back, it's fairly steady over the last few years. Point being that if there were 200k+ deaths directly related to a new illness, you'd see an increase.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
TaggartCiscontinenta 1 point ago +2 / -1

It’s almost as if the fat, old, diabetic, chronic respiratory, dialysis, cancer patients we’re gonna die soon of something else regardless. /s

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
liberty4alll 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine a pandemic so ruthless, it caused a net decrease in overall deaths. Covid saved lives.

Open back up please.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-4
WalmartIsCommunist -4 points ago +2 / -6

That's WITH quarantine, so it's not apples to apples.

10
liberty4alll 10 points ago +10 / -0

You’re right. Quarantine has caused more suicides and overdoses than previous years. So without quarantine, the number of deaths in 2020 would’ve been even smaller.

7
jigglyp33n 7 points ago +7 / -0

Florida and Texas combined currently have fewer active cases than CA. This is despite CA having fewer people and a slightly younger population. Or look at NY, which has locked down and masked up hardest of all but has triple the death rate of TX. But either way, both hypotheses "quarantines do something" and "quarantines do nothing" are not falsifiable using correlative data, which is all we have access to.