DJT could have veto'd the bill and we'd be in the exact same spot; except this way of DJT/Mitch doing things, the money is going out NOW that's what DJT wanted, and he's impounded all the crap pork money (so that money isn't going anywhere anytime soon); and just as if DJT vetoed, right now they(DJT & Mitch) would be telling congress to approve the new bill with $2k, Section 230 repeal, creating a Fraud Investigation commission, etc. This was the deal DJT/Mitch etc have been saying the whole time. And further, there's procedural crap in the arcane rulz of the Senate, so an objection had to be made; and Mitch did it rather than someone else taking the hit.
That money is going out of the country once the time limit passes.
My point still stands that if Mitch wanted to support the President he would have included the provisions the President wanted in the original bull. He didn’t, instead he appears to be working against President Trump. Also all of Mitch’s judges from the Federalist society appear to be fucking compromised cucks
If you read DJT's tweets and WH letter about the BIll, you'll see that DJT worked out a "deal" with congress to do it this way instead. So he could sign the Pork Bill, impound the nonsense money; and get the real relief money out the door asap; and that congress would take up a "new" bill to add the 1400 dollars and add the other few items: Section 230 repeal, Election Fraud Investigation Commission, (and maybe some repealing the pork).
The goal was to get the real COVID relief out the door and this is being done now. And now the Dems are in a position to say to their "voters" that they wont give them 1400 more so as to NOT create an Election Fraud Investigation Commission, or not giving them 1400 because Big Tech wants Sect 230 which congress didn't even have the lawful power to create in the first place.
appear to be fucking compromised cucks
You put is bluntly, but descriptively.
Re: Judges. The way it "works" even in (and likely long before) R.Reagan's day; is for about every "real" republican nominee that POTUS wants, he has to choose one that "the DC Swamp within (any) POTUS' party" wants (aka the label you described). It's called political capital (particularly judicial confirmation political capital). Without "political capital", then POTUS ends up like Obama without the ability to confirm anyone. So yes, at least half of those within "the conservative" judicial circle or the Federalist Society; are by my Standards NOT Strict-Constitutionalists/Strict-Constructionists; but at least most aren't crazy marxists.
Reality Check & Wisdom (aka Redpills)
That's not how the Senate or congress works.
DJT could have veto'd the bill and we'd be in the exact same spot; except this way of DJT/Mitch doing things, the money is going out NOW that's what DJT wanted, and he's impounded all the crap pork money (so that money isn't going anywhere anytime soon); and just as if DJT vetoed, right now they(DJT & Mitch) would be telling congress to approve the new bill with $2k, Section 230 repeal, creating a Fraud Investigation commission, etc. This was the deal DJT/Mitch etc have been saying the whole time. And further, there's procedural crap in the arcane rulz of the Senate, so an objection had to be made; and Mitch did it rather than someone else taking the hit.
That money is going out of the country once the time limit passes.
My point still stands that if Mitch wanted to support the President he would have included the provisions the President wanted in the original bull. He didn’t, instead he appears to be working against President Trump. Also all of Mitch’s judges from the Federalist society appear to be fucking compromised cucks
If you read DJT's tweets and WH letter about the BIll, you'll see that DJT worked out a "deal" with congress to do it this way instead. So he could sign the Pork Bill, impound the nonsense money; and get the real relief money out the door asap; and that congress would take up a "new" bill to add the 1400 dollars and add the other few items: Section 230 repeal, Election Fraud Investigation Commission, (and maybe some repealing the pork).
The goal was to get the real COVID relief out the door and this is being done now. And now the Dems are in a position to say to their "voters" that they wont give them 1400 more so as to NOT create an Election Fraud Investigation Commission, or not giving them 1400 because Big Tech wants Sect 230 which congress didn't even have the lawful power to create in the first place.
You put is bluntly, but descriptively.
Re: Judges. The way it "works" even in (and likely long before) R.Reagan's day; is for about every "real" republican nominee that POTUS wants, he has to choose one that "the DC Swamp within (any) POTUS' party" wants (aka the label you described). It's called political capital (particularly judicial confirmation political capital). Without "political capital", then POTUS ends up like Obama without the ability to confirm anyone. So yes, at least half of those within "the conservative" judicial circle or the Federalist Society; are by my Standards NOT Strict-Constitutionalists/Strict-Constructionists; but at least most aren't crazy marxists.