Lawyers of his stature and accomplishments don't tend to post hearsay unless it comes from a credible source.
Maybe that was a reasonable excuse when he started behaving like an anon on 4chan. But now, after all that time? If something - anything - of importance had panned out, I'd be with you. So far, blue balls.
Why nuke your reputation over something that is unlikely to be corroborated?
Look at all the following and clout Q has, despite the obvious failures. Not a bad deal either, no?
I find your lack of faith disturbing. I mean, we don't know. Who can still get this anxious in 2021 about not knowing? What did Barr do with the last year, eat chicken? Or did he orchestrate several massive worldwide child trafficking takedowns. Oh, and we just happened upon Ghislane chilling in a groovy jurisdiction. Nobody is now certain that Lin isn't BSing (or making a metaphor about documents, or Epstein-alikes that do exist), but it's no longer possible to be certain that Epstein died just like the MSM says and there's nothing more to the story. Time will certainly tell, and maybe it will be wild.
Maybe I'm not naïve enough to let my feelz override my brain. Faith? To whom? Lin "tick tock until the Sun dies" Wood? I get it that you're desperate for any straw, but obvious con is obvious. The only person I have faith on is GEOTUS because HE has shown results, not just words. The Lin clown? Only words.
it's no longer possible to be certain that Epstein died
I won't disagree with you on this. But does it matter, if on the 20th Biden is the president? Only this matters for now. We can ponder about Epstein after 20 days. Unless of course Epstein is the tool to overturn this shitty situation. But no even the clown has suggested that.
Look up "Ad Hominem Attacks". You are a poster child of today's "mid-wit" a semi-educated schmoe. Literally making my original point as you rage without substance or style.
Chill Beavis. Ad hominem is when you attack the person to invalidate the argument. Me calling you a stupid nitwit is plain and simple attacking you personally. Your argument, I did not even bother.
See? Thanks to my graciousness towards mental midget, you've learned something today,
You are a poster child of today's "mid-wit" a semi-educated schmoe.
With such strong projection, you can certainly join the D party in honor.
Maybe that was a reasonable excuse when he started behaving like an anon on 4chan. But now, after all that time? If something - anything - of importance had panned out, I'd be with you. So far, blue balls.
Look at all the following and clout Q has, despite the obvious failures. Not a bad deal either, no?
The inauguration is in 20 days, who gives a shit about years of legal battles? Also, the shit he's been tweeting about isn't about legal proceedings.
I find your lack of faith disturbing. I mean, we don't know. Who can still get this anxious in 2021 about not knowing? What did Barr do with the last year, eat chicken? Or did he orchestrate several massive worldwide child trafficking takedowns. Oh, and we just happened upon Ghislane chilling in a groovy jurisdiction. Nobody is now certain that Lin isn't BSing (or making a metaphor about documents, or Epstein-alikes that do exist), but it's no longer possible to be certain that Epstein died just like the MSM says and there's nothing more to the story. Time will certainly tell, and maybe it will be wild.
Maybe I'm not naïve enough to let my feelz override my brain. Faith? To whom? Lin "tick tock until the Sun dies" Wood? I get it that you're desperate for any straw, but obvious con is obvious. The only person I have faith on is GEOTUS because HE has shown results, not just words. The Lin clown? Only words.
I won't disagree with you on this. But does it matter, if on the 20th Biden is the president? Only this matters for now. We can ponder about Epstein after 20 days. Unless of course Epstein is the tool to overturn this shitty situation. But no even the clown has suggested that.
When you craft your response to rely upon your doubts then you haven't made an argument. Your opinion doesn't mean what you think it means.
And where did this holy aphorism come out from? Your ass? Don't speak nonsense just because you have a mouth.
I can't even begin to imagine the confusion in your head required to type such incoherent triviality.
Look up "Ad Hominem Attacks". You are a poster child of today's "mid-wit" a semi-educated schmoe. Literally making my original point as you rage without substance or style.
Chill Beavis. Ad hominem is when you attack the person to invalidate the argument. Me calling you a stupid nitwit is plain and simple attacking you personally. Your argument, I did not even bother.
See? Thanks to my graciousness towards mental midget, you've learned something today,
With such strong projection, you can certainly join the D party in honor.