Lawyers of his stature and accomplishments don't tend to post hearsay unless it comes from a credible source.
Maybe that was a reasonable excuse when he started behaving like an anon on 4chan. But now, after all that time? If something - anything - of importance had panned out, I'd be with you. So far, blue balls.
Why nuke your reputation over something that is unlikely to be corroborated?
Look at all the following and clout Q has, despite the obvious failures. Not a bad deal either, no?
Look up "Ad Hominem Attacks". You are a poster child of today's "mid-wit" a semi-educated schmoe. Literally making my original point as you rage without substance or style.
Maybe that was a reasonable excuse when he started behaving like an anon on 4chan. But now, after all that time? If something - anything - of importance had panned out, I'd be with you. So far, blue balls.
Look at all the following and clout Q has, despite the obvious failures. Not a bad deal either, no?
When you craft your response to rely upon your doubts then you haven't made an argument. Your opinion doesn't mean what you think it means.
And where did this holy aphorism come out from? Your ass? Don't speak nonsense just because you have a mouth.
I can't even begin to imagine the confusion in your head required to type such incoherent triviality.
Look up "Ad Hominem Attacks". You are a poster child of today's "mid-wit" a semi-educated schmoe. Literally making my original point as you rage without substance or style.