7014
Comments (959)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
29
MAGAlomaniac77 29 points ago +30 / -1

Doesn't matter. The intent to intimidate and enforce compliance to tyranny is exactly the same, even if the guns were not loaded at all.

2
OconusLurex 2 points ago +6 / -4

It does matter. This is indefensible, but I also spent a lot of time in countries when I was growing up that had troops and police with fully loaded rifles stationed at every bank and airport and city center- it is entirely different, and we need to acknowledge that there is a difference to make sure it doesn't happen here. If what these cops were carrying was fully lethal, against people that pose no threat (edit: OP said they were breaking up a protest, in which case this has been SOP for over a decade,) we'd have crossed a truly terrifying line in the sand as a country. That is not to diminish or excuse all the other terrifying lines in the sand that we've crossed, or that this picture portrays, just to note that there really is a difference that matters.

3
MAGAlomaniac77 3 points ago +4 / -1

We're not in disagreement. I was saying that regardless of whether they're real guns, pepper guns, or toy guns, the end result (i.e. tyranny being enforced) is the same.

0
OconusLurex 0 points ago +2 / -2

Yes, what I was trying to say is that there are different forms and levels of tyranny, oppression, and state intimidation. I've had pepperball guns pointed at me, and I've had a real gun pointed at me, and everyone, in that moment when the barrel is pointed at them, knows the difference. That difference does matter. On a personal level, and on a state level.

3
MAGAlomaniac77 3 points ago +3 / -0

Right. That's true if you know what kind of gun's being pointed at you. But if you don't, then you're always going to assume that it's a real firearm, and feel that maximum level of intimidation.