No it wasn't, he offered no proof of that and frankly is pretty fucking retarded. I wanted it to be true but after watching the live video he put out last night it was apparent he's completely full of shit. He should have stuck to the physical attributes of ballots, but has now completely discredited himself. Anyone believing his Chinese roku TV bullshit is just as bad. He fucked us.
Not really. The tablets are connected to the internet. A chinese manufactured smart tv is connected to the tablet. Smart TV's are notorious for spying on users. My Samsung TV was recording audio, sending all my google data all over the globe. A chinese tv would be just as bad.
The chinese tv uses a unicast mac address, meaning it targets a single component of the network, not any other devices. Its a 1:1 connection not a 1:20 like if you remotely logged into your home network.
Imagine it like this. Youre at home, you have a tv, ipad, phone, roku, in addition to your pc on the network. You can make a direct connection with the ipad, its online, but everything else (to use) is offline. You cant hack the network directly, but you can easily hack the tablet, run a script as a scheduled task when it is only connected locally to the other devices (ie when the elections start).
Another option is someone can turn on the wifi on one of the election machines, theres a bunch and it only takes a second, and fix the election in a millisecond. This could also be done via the tablet and the scheduled task inserted, wouldnt even require an onsite collaborator.
All of that is irrelevant though. Point is is there is a remote point of entry onto the network and that is illegal. Any decent hacker would chomp at the bit for such an oversight. It compromises everything.
Lol! Okay then. Believe what you want but elections aren't ran in SCIFs. It's a public building so of course there is going to be WiFi signals around. People walking through to vote probably have hotspots through their phones, so what? He has not proven any link to the election infrastructure being online through wireless network and no amount of him saying wireless shouldn't be found in a public place will change that. If this is what he meant by "we're in", then he he should just go away.
I want to win this thing too, but this guy is full of shit and I won't sacrifice my integrity for it.
Pulitzer invented a barcode scanner, shaped like a mouse, shaped like a cat. Called it CueCat. This fucking guy got 180 MILLION DOLLARS invested into it. Among those investors, BELO Corporation, invested 37.5 MILLION DOLLARS.
The product was a laughingstock and Pulitzer made bank while the investors got nothing. BELO Corp probably pretty salty right? No doubt no doubt.
Brad Raffensperger's smear piece uses a single source for its characterization claims, a story published by the Dallas Morning News.
Guess who owns the Dallas Morning News? BELO Corp.
"However, the Wifi capability is disabled before the poll pads are put in to use at the polling place."
We saw yesterday that a pad at a live polling center was connected to the internet via a roku smart tv AND communicating with a Chinese IP address.
No it wasn't, he offered no proof of that and frankly is pretty fucking retarded. I wanted it to be true but after watching the live video he put out last night it was apparent he's completely full of shit. He should have stuck to the physical attributes of ballots, but has now completely discredited himself. Anyone believing his Chinese roku TV bullshit is just as bad. He fucked us.
Not really. The tablets are connected to the internet. A chinese manufactured smart tv is connected to the tablet. Smart TV's are notorious for spying on users. My Samsung TV was recording audio, sending all my google data all over the globe. A chinese tv would be just as bad.
The chinese tv uses a unicast mac address, meaning it targets a single component of the network, not any other devices. Its a 1:1 connection not a 1:20 like if you remotely logged into your home network.
Imagine it like this. Youre at home, you have a tv, ipad, phone, roku, in addition to your pc on the network. You can make a direct connection with the ipad, its online, but everything else (to use) is offline. You cant hack the network directly, but you can easily hack the tablet, run a script as a scheduled task when it is only connected locally to the other devices (ie when the elections start).
Another option is someone can turn on the wifi on one of the election machines, theres a bunch and it only takes a second, and fix the election in a millisecond. This could also be done via the tablet and the scheduled task inserted, wouldnt even require an onsite collaborator.
All of that is irrelevant though. Point is is there is a remote point of entry onto the network and that is illegal. Any decent hacker would chomp at the bit for such an oversight. It compromises everything.
Lol! Okay then. Believe what you want but elections aren't ran in SCIFs. It's a public building so of course there is going to be WiFi signals around. People walking through to vote probably have hotspots through their phones, so what? He has not proven any link to the election infrastructure being online through wireless network and no amount of him saying wireless shouldn't be found in a public place will change that. If this is what he meant by "we're in", then he he should just go away.
I want to win this thing too, but this guy is full of shit and I won't sacrifice my integrity for it.
They can take the time to write this garbage but can't investigate anything or return phone calls? They are so busy firing whistle blowers...
Can't wait to hear Raffy say all that with the rope around his neck.
Weird that nobody listed their name as the author of that libelous garbage.
Wow. Talk about sour
Omg this is fucking hilarious.
Pulitzer invented a barcode scanner, shaped like a mouse, shaped like a cat. Called it CueCat. This fucking guy got 180 MILLION DOLLARS invested into it. Among those investors, BELO Corporation, invested 37.5 MILLION DOLLARS.
The product was a laughingstock and Pulitzer made bank while the investors got nothing. BELO Corp probably pretty salty right? No doubt no doubt.
Brad Raffensperger's smear piece uses a single source for its characterization claims, a story published by the Dallas Morning News.
Guess who owns the Dallas Morning News? BELO Corp.
Hello, BELO....