This was exactly the testimony of some of the patriots testifying in Georgia. Jam after jam, and at the place she was observing they were all hitting rescan, not discard. However, that means nothing as to what this lady was doing. She's likely on a pitchfork already, but looking around while shuffling papers and pushing buttons is precisely her job description. I'm skeptical too and this is worth investigating and hopefully auditing her station or center, but this is as likely, in my opinion, to be legit. Okay, now call me names.
It's not the machine, it's the ballot. If a ballot jams, yes, it's likely to jam multiple times until the reason for the jam is resolved.
While there are concerns that ballots were intentionally treated so they would jam, be that through physical defacing, or through purposeful misprinting, this video is not evidence of either.
And stop downvoting shit just because it runs contrary to your recreational justice boner. There's plenty of legitimate evidence of fraud - there's literally zero reason to cling to something so clearly explainable through the exact process for resolving a jam. It doesn't matter if she's hitting discard or rescan, if she dog eared a ballot so it would jam or not, because this video isn't evidence of either.
This is just the 30th video I've seen of a 90% Biden voter "jamming" over and over and looking around to see if anyone is watching her "jam" the machine.
Sorry buddy, I watched every video on dominion ballots machines including the training videos and know where does it say to keep feeding the same faulty ballots through the machine. What after 6 times you get different results.
It looked like the first scan she pressed the screen two times. Left side both times.
Second scan she pressed the screen three times. Right, left, right.
Third time. Pressed screen three times. Right, left, right.
Fourth time was at least three, maybe four. Right, left, (center?), Right.
Fifth time was at least three but was partially obstructed by the supervisor. Right, left, right.
Not sure what the layout looks like and what buttons are located where.
Most actions seen clear and look to start center height on the screen and move down with every press after that.
And since we don't know where the buttons are let alone how large they are, we can't make any judgement that this differs in any way from a legitimate execution of a legitimate procedure for the situation at hand.
I have seven years as a print tech running everything from your commercial printers to docutechs, web fed presses, and million dollar (then state of the art) digital presses.
And yes, there are a ton of ways to 'jam' that don't result in a crumpled paper like in your dinky little office printer. Your 10k printed is a complicated series of process using shit parts. The dominion machine is just a single pass scanner.
Jams can include non feeds, double feed, delayed feeds, misalignments, misscans, uninterpretable scans, and so on - non of which result in a crumpled paper and are just going to spit the ballot out and pop up a fault.
we know that is a lie
Well you need to check yourself. Because you can literally watch the machine stop in the middle of it's batch without user input. You can listen to witness testimony describing this fault in detail.
If you 'know' that this is fraud, when in fact it isn't evidence at all of such, then you are outing yourself as a purveyor of untrustworthy knowledge. Your standards for 'knowing' are shit and no one should trust anything you say on anything.
This ObjectiveReality guy is a moron who is obsessed with claiming that there is no fraud in this video, which cannot reasonably be determined. He has no experience with Dominion machines and is trying to make the same assertions that a shill would.
Scan, scan, scan, and scan the same ballots again and again. It all good.
Most popular candidate in four counties ever.
Sure. Multiple jams after jams.
If so, pull the machine out of service.
I know that when I'm fixing a jam I always look around to check and see if anyone is watching me.
And I always pretend to re-check the same documents that just jammed as if they were new documents just handed to me.
This was exactly the testimony of some of the patriots testifying in Georgia. Jam after jam, and at the place she was observing they were all hitting rescan, not discard. However, that means nothing as to what this lady was doing. She's likely on a pitchfork already, but looking around while shuffling papers and pushing buttons is precisely her job description. I'm skeptical too and this is worth investigating and hopefully auditing her station or center, but this is as likely, in my opinion, to be legit. Okay, now call me names.
It's not the machine, it's the ballot. If a ballot jams, yes, it's likely to jam multiple times until the reason for the jam is resolved.
While there are concerns that ballots were intentionally treated so they would jam, be that through physical defacing, or through purposeful misprinting, this video is not evidence of either.
And stop downvoting shit just because it runs contrary to your recreational justice boner. There's plenty of legitimate evidence of fraud - there's literally zero reason to cling to something so clearly explainable through the exact process for resolving a jam. It doesn't matter if she's hitting discard or rescan, if she dog eared a ballot so it would jam or not, because this video isn't evidence of either.
This is just the 30th video I've seen of a 90% Biden voter "jamming" over and over and looking around to see if anyone is watching her "jam" the machine.
Yes! I feel like this group of rowdy, "I don't care, string them all up anyway" crowd is:
a) genuinely fed up with it all and justifiably on edge, but should cool their jets
b) a bunch of 14-18 yo who are along for the lulz
C) agitators poking the beehive, hoping to condemn the bees.
Not saying we don't rebel, but let's think things through, recognizing we now represent POTUS to some extent.
Sorry buddy, I watched every video on dominion ballots machines including the training videos and know where does it say to keep feeding the same faulty ballots through the machine. What after 6 times you get different results.
It’s FRAUD. Plain and simple.
It looked like the first scan she pressed the screen two times. Left side both times. Second scan she pressed the screen three times. Right, left, right. Third time. Pressed screen three times. Right, left, right. Fourth time was at least three, maybe four. Right, left, (center?), Right.
Fifth time was at least three but was partially obstructed by the supervisor. Right, left, right.
Not sure what the layout looks like and what buttons are located where.
Most actions seen clear and look to start center height on the screen and move down with every press after that.
And since we don't know where the buttons are let alone how large they are, we can't make any judgement that this differs in any way from a legitimate execution of a legitimate procedure for the situation at hand.
Yes we can. That's what challenging the procedure is for.
A jam where you don’t have to open the machine to clear it?
When the $10,000+ copy machines in the office require you to open the machine to clear a jam and she doesn’t, we know that is a lie
I have seven years as a print tech running everything from your commercial printers to docutechs, web fed presses, and million dollar (then state of the art) digital presses.
And yes, there are a ton of ways to 'jam' that don't result in a crumpled paper like in your dinky little office printer. Your 10k printed is a complicated series of process using shit parts. The dominion machine is just a single pass scanner.
Jams can include non feeds, double feed, delayed feeds, misalignments, misscans, uninterpretable scans, and so on - non of which result in a crumpled paper and are just going to spit the ballot out and pop up a fault.
Well you need to check yourself. Because you can literally watch the machine stop in the middle of it's batch without user input. You can listen to witness testimony describing this fault in detail.
If you 'know' that this is fraud, when in fact it isn't evidence at all of such, then you are outing yourself as a purveyor of untrustworthy knowledge. Your standards for 'knowing' are shit and no one should trust anything you say on anything.
Attend to your ignorance.
This ObjectiveReality guy is a moron who is obsessed with claiming that there is no fraud in this video, which cannot reasonably be determined. He has no experience with Dominion machines and is trying to make the same assertions that a shill would.