7490
Comments (836)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
GSyvKaCP 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is hardly concrete evidence. Suspicious, yes. But would not do shit in court. They could argue that there were ballots causing issues with the scanner, and looking around isn't a crime. Need more than this, unfortunately.

0
MAGAlikethis [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

It doesn't make sense to keep running the same ballots through and just discard them all every time. My money says she was not discarding them every time.