You aren't supposed to discard ballots, you're supposed to hit the discard button, which discards the existing tally. You are supposed to put the already scanned ballots back in the queue and the testimony covers that.
When a ballot jams it will put up and error, it will SAY 'Discard' or 'Rescan'
Buttons on the screen
when that occurs the correct way to go about it is to 'discard' (button) the whole batch, take the ones that already scanned, put them back into the pile, put the one that jammed on top, discard, discard the whole thing, then rescan them
Do you understand now?
You can’t see the screen and don’t know where the buttons are or what’s she pushing.
No shit. That's the point. The video is evidence of a jam, not of fraud. Nothing in the video is contrary to the normal legitimate way of addressing the situation. It is certainly possible that she is committing fraud, BUT THIS VIDEO IS NOT EVIDENCE OF FRAUD.
The machine halts mid batch without user input, resulting in an error message and prompting the user of intervention.
If you want to reject the word that both I and witness testimony use to describe the situation, fine, replace it with one of your choosing. My argument is unchanged by the word.
This isn't evidence of fraud, it's only evidence of a [insert your preferred descriptor here]
Good morning
You aren't supposed to discard ballots, you're supposed to hit the discard button, which discards the existing tally. You are supposed to put the already scanned ballots back in the queue and the testimony covers that.
Watch it again, pay closer attention.
ie the tally, not the subset of scanned ballots
Here is testimony from a different day
Buttons on the screen
Do you understand now?
No shit. That's the point. The video is evidence of a jam, not of fraud. Nothing in the video is contrary to the normal legitimate way of addressing the situation. It is certainly possible that she is committing fraud, BUT THIS VIDEO IS NOT EVIDENCE OF FRAUD.
I don't think you understand what "jam" means. You're a moron. There was no ballot jam here.
The machine halts mid batch without user input, resulting in an error message and prompting the user of intervention.
If you want to reject the word that both I and witness testimony use to describe the situation, fine, replace it with one of your choosing. My argument is unchanged by the word.
This isn't evidence of fraud, it's only evidence of a [insert your preferred descriptor here]